PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XRLV vs. QLV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XRLV vs. QLV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco S&P 500 ex-Rate Sensitive Low Volatility ETF (XRLV) and FlexShares US Quality Low Volatility Index Fund (QLV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


XRLV

1D
1M
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

QLV

1D
-0.51%
1M
2.14%
YTD
5.48%
6M
5.38%
1Y
14.06%
3Y*
15.15%
5Y*
10.73%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XRLV vs. QLV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
XRLV
Invesco S&P 500 ex-Rate Sensitive Low Volatility ETF
6.34%4.11%14.11%0.06%-4.77%27.39%2.56%5.56%
QLV
FlexShares US Quality Low Volatility Index Fund
5.48%12.28%18.08%13.71%-9.97%26.08%9.63%6.24%

Correlation

The correlation between XRLV and QLV is 0.51, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.51

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.68

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.78

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 17, 2019

0.83

Over the past year, the correlation between XRLV and QLV has dropped to 0.51 - well below their long-term average of 0.83, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

XRLV vs. QLV - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
XRLV
QLV

Utilities

21.5%
6.5%

Financial Services

16.3%
12.3%

Consumer Defensive

15.3%
8.5%

Real Estate

11.6%
1.7%

Healthcare

8.4%
12.7%

Industrials

7.2%
6.3%

Consumer Cyclical

7.1%
6.8%

Technology

5.6%
28.6%

Basic Materials

3.1%
2.4%

Communication Services

2.8%
8.4%

Energy

1.1%
5.8%

Utilities

XRLV
21.5%
QLV
6.5%

Financial Services

XRLV
16.3%
QLV
12.3%

Consumer Defensive

XRLV
15.3%
QLV
8.5%

Real Estate

XRLV
11.6%
QLV
1.7%

Healthcare

XRLV
8.4%
QLV
12.7%

Industrials

XRLV
7.2%
QLV
6.3%

Consumer Cyclical

XRLV
7.1%
QLV
6.8%

Technology

XRLV
5.6%
QLV
28.6%

Basic Materials

XRLV
3.1%
QLV
2.4%

Communication Services

XRLV
2.8%
QLV
8.4%

Energy

XRLV
1.1%
QLV
5.8%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XRLV vs. QLV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XRLV

QLV
QLV Risk / Return Rank: 5353
Overall Rank
QLV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5454
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QLV Sortino Ratio Rank: 5656
Sortino Ratio Rank
QLV Omega Ratio Rank: 5151
Omega Ratio Rank
QLV Calmar Ratio Rank: 4646
Calmar Ratio Rank
QLV Martin Ratio Rank: 5656
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XRLV vs. QLV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P 500 ex-Rate Sensitive Low Volatility ETF (XRLV) and FlexShares US Quality Low Volatility Index Fund (QLV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

XRLV vs. QLV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


XRLVQLVDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.85

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.85

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.69

Drawdowns

XRLV vs. QLV - Drawdown Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XRLVQLVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-33.71%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.19%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-12.05%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-17.93%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.81%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.00%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.45%

Volatility

XRLV vs. QLV - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XRLVQLVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.61%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

5.34%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

7.65%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

12.64%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.57%

XRLV vs. QLV - Expense Ratio Comparison

XRLV has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is higher than QLV's 0.22% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

XRLV vs. QLV - Dividend Comparison

XRLV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.53%, which matches QLV's 1.52% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
QLV
FlexShares US Quality Low Volatility Index Fund
1.52%1.60%1.66%1.60%1.74%0.96%1.24%0.58%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
XRLV
Invesco S&P 500 ex-Rate Sensitive Low Volatility ETF
1.53%2.15%1.94%2.57%1.96%1.26%1.65%1.66%1.76%1.39%1.71%1.07%

Frequently Asked Questions


XRLV and QLV have a correlation of 0.51, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, QLV is cheaper at 0.22% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

QLV is cheaper with a 0.22% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for XRLV.

XRLV and QLV have nearly identical dividend yields, around 1.53%.

XRLV is categorized as S&P 500, while QLV is Volatility Hedged Equity. XRLV tracks S&P 500 Low Volatility Rate Response Index, while QLV tracks Northern Trust Quality Low Volatility Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Northern Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for XRLV and 0.22% for QLV.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XRLV and QLV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer