PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FDIS vs. VEA
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FDIS vs. VEA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity MSCI Consumer Discretionary Index ETF (FDIS) and Vanguard FTSE Developed Markets ETF (VEA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FDIS achieves a 0.01% return, which is significantly lower than VEA's 14.73% return. Over the past 10 years, FDIS has outperformed VEA with an annualized return of 13.98%, while VEA has yielded a comparatively lower 10.72% annualized return.


FDIS

1D
0.20%
1M
0.19%
YTD
0.01%
6M
-1.14%
1Y
11.18%
3Y*
13.37%
5Y*
6.04%
10Y*
13.98%

VEA

1D
0.34%
1M
1.30%
YTD
14.73%
6M
16.65%
1Y
29.82%
3Y*
19.03%
5Y*
9.51%
10Y*
10.72%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FDIS vs. VEA - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FDIS
Fidelity MSCI Consumer Discretionary Index ETF
0.01%5.67%24.43%40.48%-35.23%24.25%49.50%27.44%-0.88%22.96%
VEA
Vanguard FTSE Developed Markets ETF
14.73%35.16%3.15%17.93%-15.34%11.66%9.71%22.62%-14.75%26.42%

Correlation

The correlation between FDIS and VEA is 0.67, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.67

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.65

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.69

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.69

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 24, 2013

0.70

The correlation between FDIS and VEA has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.65 to 0.70 - a consistent structural relationship.

FDIS vs. VEA - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
FDIS
VEA

Consumer Cyclical

96.9%
7.5%

Consumer Defensive

1.0%
5.6%

Technology

0.9%
13.8%

Industrials

0.8%
19.2%

Communication Services

0.2%
3.4%

Healthcare

0.1%
8.2%

Financial Services

0.1%
23.3%

Real Estate

0.1%
2.7%

Basic Materials

-

7.5%

Energy

-

5.4%

Utilities

-

3.3%

Consumer Cyclical

FDIS
96.9%
VEA
7.5%

Consumer Defensive

FDIS
1.0%
VEA
5.6%

Technology

FDIS
0.9%
VEA
13.8%

Industrials

FDIS
0.8%
VEA
19.2%

Communication Services

FDIS
0.2%
VEA
3.4%

Healthcare

FDIS
0.1%
VEA
8.2%

Financial Services

FDIS
0.1%
VEA
23.3%

Real Estate

FDIS
0.1%
VEA
2.7%

Basic Materials

FDIS

-

VEA
7.5%

Energy

FDIS

-

VEA
5.4%

Utilities

FDIS

-

VEA
3.3%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FDIS vs. VEA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FDIS
FDIS Risk / Return Rank: 2020
Overall Rank
FDIS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2121
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FDIS Sortino Ratio Rank: 2020
Sortino Ratio Rank
FDIS Omega Ratio Rank: 1919
Omega Ratio Rank
FDIS Calmar Ratio Rank: 1919
Calmar Ratio Rank
FDIS Martin Ratio Rank: 2121
Martin Ratio Rank

VEA
VEA Risk / Return Rank: 6262
Overall Rank
VEA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6363
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VEA Sortino Ratio Rank: 6262
Sortino Ratio Rank
VEA Omega Ratio Rank: 6363
Omega Ratio Rank
VEA Calmar Ratio Rank: 5959
Calmar Ratio Rank
VEA Martin Ratio Rank: 6363
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FDIS vs. VEA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity MSCI Consumer Discretionary Index ETF (FDIS) and Vanguard FTSE Developed Markets ETF (VEA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FDISVEADifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.20

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.53

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.11

1.33

-0.22

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.72

2.58

-1.85

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.24

9.92

-7.68

FDIS vs. VEA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FDIS Sharpe Ratio is 0.61, which is lower than the VEA Sharpe Ratio of 1.81. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FDIS and VEA, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FDIS vs. VEA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FDIS drawdown since its inception was -39.16%, smaller than the maximum VEA drawdown of -60.68%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FDIS and VEA.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FDISVEADifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-39.16%

-60.68%

+21.52%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-15.50%

-11.63%

-3.87%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-27.43%

-13.45%

-13.98%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-39.16%

-29.71%

-9.45%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-39.16%

-35.73%

-3.43%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.58%

-1.06%

-3.52%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.49%

-13.28%

+5.79%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.01%

3.02%

+1.99%

Volatility

FDIS vs. VEA - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Fidelity MSCI Consumer Discretionary Index ETF (FDIS) is 6.19%, while Vanguard FTSE Developed Markets ETF (VEA) has a volatility of 6.84%. This indicates that FDIS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VEA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FDISVEADifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.19%

6.84%

-0.65%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.44%

14.38%

-0.94%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.52%

16.58%

+1.94%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

23.92%

16.72%

+7.20%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.32%

17.40%

+4.92%

FDIS vs. VEA - Expense Ratio Comparison

FDIS has a 0.08% expense ratio, which is higher than VEA's 0.03% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

FDIS vs. VEA - Dividend Comparison

FDIS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.73%, less than VEA's 2.62% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FDIS
Fidelity MSCI Consumer Discretionary Index ETF
0.73%0.75%0.69%0.78%1.00%0.58%0.59%1.14%1.29%1.00%1.62%1.25%
VEA
Vanguard FTSE Developed Markets ETF
2.62%3.22%3.35%3.15%2.91%3.16%2.04%3.04%3.35%2.77%3.05%2.92%

Frequently Asked Questions


FDIS and VEA have a correlation of 0.67, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

VEA has higher volatility (6.84%) compared to FDIS (6.19%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FDIS dropped -39.16% vs VEA's -60.68%.

On 10-year performance, FDIS leads with 13.98% vs 10.72% for VEA. On fees, VEA is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, FDIS has been the lower-risk option at 6.19%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, FDIS has performed better with a 13.98% return vs 10.72%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VEA is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.08% for FDIS.

VEA has the higher dividend yield at 2.62%, compared with 0.73% for FDIS.

FDIS is categorized as Consumer Discretionary Equities, while VEA is Foreign Large Cap Equities. FDIS tracks MSCI USA IMI Consumer Discretionary Index, while VEA tracks FTSE Developed All Cap ex US Index. They also come from different issuers: Fidelity and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.08% for FDIS and 0.03% for VEA.

VEA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.81 vs 0.61), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FDIS and VEA

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer