FDIS vs. QQQI

Last updated Jun 14, 2026

FDIS (Fidelity MSCI Consumer Discretionary Index ETF) and QQQI (NEOS Nasdaq-100 High Income ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - FDIS is a Consumer Discretionary Equities fund tracking the MSCI USA IMI Consumer Discretionary Index, while QQQI is a Nasdaq-100 fund actively managed by Neos. FDIS is passively managed, while QQQI is actively managed. Over the past year, FDIS returned 12.39% vs 27.00% for QQQI. A 0.77 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. FDIS charges 0.08%/yr vs 0.68%/yr for QQQI.

Performance

FDIS vs. QQQI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity MSCI Consumer Discretionary Index ETF (FDIS) and NEOS Nasdaq-100 High Income ETF (QQQI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FDIS achieves a 0.01% return, which is significantly lower than QQQI's 10.58% return.

FDIS

• 1D: 0.20%
• 1M: 0.16%
• YTD: 0.01%
• 6M: -1.14%
• 1Y: 12.39%
• 3Y*: 13.37%
• 5Y*: 6.04%
• 10Y*: 13.98%

QQQI

• 1D: 0.70%
• 1M: -0.22%
• YTD: 10.58%
• 6M: 11.20%
• 1Y: 27.00%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FDIS vs. QQQI - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
FDIS Fidelity MSCI Consumer Discretionary Index ETF	0.01%	5.67%	26.63%
QQQI NEOS Nasdaq-100 High Income ETF	10.58%	18.62%	19.44%

Correlation

The correlation between FDIS and QQQI is 0.72, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.72
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 30, 2024	0.77

The correlation between FDIS and QQQI has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.72 to 0.77 - a consistent structural relationship.

FDIS vs. QQQI - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	FDIS	QQQI
Consumer Cyclical	96.7%	11.3%
Consumer Defensive	1.1%	6.5%
Technology	1.0%	58.1%
Industrials	0.9%	3.0%
Communication Services	0.3%	14.2%
Healthcare	0.1%	3.9%
Real Estate	0.1%	0.1%
Financial Services	0.1%	0.2%
Basic Materials	-	1.0%
Energy	-	0.5%
Utilities	-	1.3%

Return for Risk

FDIS vs. QQQI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FDIS

FDIS Risk / Return Rank: 20
FDIS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 21
FDIS Sortino Ratio Rank: 20
FDIS Omega Ratio Rank: 19
FDIS Calmar Ratio Rank: 19
FDIS Martin Ratio Rank: 21

QQQI

QQQI Risk / Return Rank: 65
QQQI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 65
QQQI Sortino Ratio Rank: 59
QQQI Omega Ratio Rank: 67
QQQI Calmar Ratio Rank: 62
QQQI Martin Ratio Rank: 72

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FDIS vs. QQQI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity MSCI Consumer Discretionary Index ETF (FDIS) and NEOS Nasdaq-100 High Income ETF (QQQI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	FDIS	QQQI	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.61	1.84	-1.24
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.97	2.43	-1.46
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.11	1.34	-0.23
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.72	2.70	-1.98
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	2.24	11.63	-9.39

FDIS vs. QQQI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FDIS Sharpe Ratio is 0.61, which is lower than the QQQI Sharpe Ratio of 1.84. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FDIS and QQQI, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

FDIS vs. QQQI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FDIS drawdown since its inception was -39.16%, which is greater than QQQI's maximum drawdown of -20.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FDIS and QQQI.

Drawdown Indicators

	FDIS	QQQI	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-39.16%	-20.00%	-19.16%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-15.50%	-9.61%	-5.89%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-27.43%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-39.16%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-39.16%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-4.58%	-2.69%	-1.89%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-7.49%	-2.21%	-5.28%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	5.01%	2.23%	+2.78%

Volatility

FDIS vs. QQQI - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity MSCI Consumer Discretionary Index ETF (FDIS) and NEOS Nasdaq-100 High Income ETF (QQQI) have volatilities of 6.19% and 6.10%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FDIS	QQQI	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	6.19%	6.10%	+0.09%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	13.44%	11.35%	+2.09%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	18.52%	14.10%	+4.42%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	23.92%	17.34%	+6.58%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	22.32%	17.34%	+4.98%

FDIS vs. QQQI - Expense Ratio Comparison

FDIS has a 0.08% expense ratio, which is lower than QQQI's 0.68% expense ratio.

Dividends

FDIS vs. QQQI - Dividend Comparison

FDIS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.73%, less than QQQI's 13.53% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FDIS Fidelity MSCI Consumer Discretionary Index ETF	0.73%	0.75%	0.69%	0.78%	1.00%	0.58%	0.59%	1.14%	1.29%	1.00%	1.62%	1.25%
QQQI NEOS Nasdaq-100 High Income ETF	13.53%	13.82%	12.85%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FDIS and QQQI in my portfolio?

FDIS and QQQI have a correlation of 0.72, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, FDIS or QQQI?

FDIS has higher volatility (6.19%) compared to QQQI (6.10%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FDIS dropped -39.16% vs QQQI's -20.00%.

Which ETF is better, FDIS or QQQI?

On 1-year performance, QQQI leads with 27.00% vs 12.39% for FDIS. On fees, FDIS is cheaper at 0.08% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, FDIS or QQQI?

Over the 1-year period, QQQI has performed better with a 27.00% return vs 12.39%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, FDIS or QQQI?

FDIS is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.68% for QQQI.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, FDIS or QQQI?

QQQI has the higher dividend yield at 13.53%, compared with 0.73% for FDIS.

What is the main difference between FDIS and QQQI?

FDIS is categorized as Consumer Discretionary Equities, while QQQI is Nasdaq-100. They also come from different issuers: Fidelity and Neos. Their fees differ too: 0.08% for FDIS and 0.68% for QQQI.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

QQQI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.84 vs 0.61), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.