PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
QQQI vs. SCHD
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

QQQI vs. SCHD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in NEOS Nasdaq-100 High Income ETF (QQQI) and Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

QQQI vs. SCHD - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
QQQI
NEOS Nasdaq-100 High Income ETF
-4.41%18.62%19.83%
SCHD
Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF
12.79%4.34%10.12%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QQQI achieves a -4.41% return, which is significantly lower than SCHD's 12.79% return.


QQQI

1D
3.26%
1M
-4.11%
YTD
-4.41%
6M
-1.61%
1Y
20.87%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

SCHD

1D
0.66%
1M
-2.61%
YTD
12.79%
6M
14.49%
1Y
13.97%
3Y*
12.05%
5Y*
8.44%
10Y*
12.31%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


QQQI vs. SCHD - Expense Ratio Comparison

QQQI has a 0.68% expense ratio, which is higher than SCHD's 0.06% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

QQQI vs. SCHD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QQQI
QQQI Risk / Return Rank: 7272
Overall Rank
QQQI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6464
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QQQI Sortino Ratio Rank: 6969
Sortino Ratio Rank
QQQI Omega Ratio Rank: 7171
Omega Ratio Rank
QQQI Calmar Ratio Rank: 7575
Calmar Ratio Rank
QQQI Martin Ratio Rank: 8181
Martin Ratio Rank

SCHD
SCHD Risk / Return Rank: 5252
Overall Rank
SCHD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5454
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SCHD Sortino Ratio Rank: 5555
Sortino Ratio Rank
SCHD Omega Ratio Rank: 5454
Omega Ratio Rank
SCHD Calmar Ratio Rank: 5353
Calmar Ratio Rank
SCHD Martin Ratio Rank: 4545
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QQQI vs. SCHD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for NEOS Nasdaq-100 High Income ETF (QQQI) and Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


QQQISCHDDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.06

0.89

+0.17

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.65

1.35

+0.31

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.25

1.19

+0.06

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.82

1.19

+0.63

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

8.28

3.99

+4.29

QQQI vs. SCHD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QQQI Sharpe Ratio is 1.06, which is comparable to the SCHD Sharpe Ratio of 0.89. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QQQI and SCHD, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


QQQISCHDDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.06

0.89

+0.17

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.59

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.74

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.88

0.84

+0.03

Correlation

The correlation between QQQI and SCHD is 0.33, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Dividends

QQQI vs. SCHD - Dividend Comparison

QQQI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 15.05%, more than SCHD's 3.44% yield.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
QQQI
NEOS Nasdaq-100 High Income ETF
15.05%13.82%12.85%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
SCHD
Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF
3.44%3.82%3.64%3.49%3.39%2.78%3.16%2.98%3.06%2.63%2.89%2.97%

Drawdowns

QQQI vs. SCHD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QQQI drawdown since its inception was -20.00%, smaller than the maximum SCHD drawdown of -33.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QQQI and SCHD.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


QQQISCHDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-20.00%

-33.37%

+13.37%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.46%

-12.74%

+1.28%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-16.85%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.37%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-6.66%

-2.89%

-3.77%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.31%

-3.34%

+1.03%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.52%

3.89%

-1.37%

Volatility

QQQI vs. SCHD - Volatility Comparison

NEOS Nasdaq-100 High Income ETF (QQQI) has a higher volatility of 6.11% compared to Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD) at 2.40%. This indicates that QQQI's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SCHD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


QQQISCHDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.11%

2.40%

+3.71%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.18%

7.96%

+3.22%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

19.70%

15.74%

+3.96%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.49%

14.40%

+3.09%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.49%

16.70%

+0.79%