QQQI vs. QQQ
QQQI (NEOS Nasdaq-100 High Income ETF) and QQQ (Invesco QQQ ETF) are both Nasdaq-100 funds. QQQI is actively managed, while QQQ is passively managed. Over the past year, QQQI returned 25.21% vs 35.35% for QQQ. With a 0.98 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. QQQI charges 0.68%/yr vs 0.18%/yr for QQQ.
Performance
QQQI vs. QQQ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, QQQI achieves a 9.81% return, which is significantly lower than QQQ's 16.88% return.
QQQI
- 1D
- 2.90%
- 1M
- 0.16%
- YTD
- 9.81%
- 6M
- 8.76%
- 1Y
- 25.21%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
QQQ
- 1D
- 3.38%
- 1M
- 1.40%
- YTD
- 16.88%
- 6M
- 14.93%
- 1Y
- 35.35%
- 3Y*
- 26.51%
- 5Y*
- 16.71%
- 10Y*
- 21.71%
QQQI vs. QQQ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
QQQI NEOS Nasdaq-100 High Income ETF | 9.81% | 18.62% | 19.44% |
QQQ Invesco QQQ ETF | 16.88% | 20.77% | 20.11% |
Correlation
The correlation between QQQI and QQQ is 0.99 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.99 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 30, 2024 | 0.98 |
The correlation between QQQI and QQQ has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.98 to 0.99 - a consistent structural relationship.
QQQI vs. QQQ - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
QQQI
QQQ
Technology
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Consumer Defensive
Healthcare
Industrials
Utilities
Basic Materials
Energy
Financial Services
Real Estate
Technology
QQQI
QQQ
Communication Services
QQQI
QQQ
Consumer Cyclical
QQQI
QQQ
Consumer Defensive
QQQI
QQQ
Healthcare
QQQI
QQQ
Industrials
QQQI
QQQ
Utilities
QQQI
QQQ
Basic Materials
QQQI
QQQ
Energy
QQQI
QQQ
Financial Services
QQQI
QQQ
Real Estate
QQQI
QQQ
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
QQQI vs. QQQ — Risk / Return Rank
QQQI
QQQ
QQQI vs. QQQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for NEOS Nasdaq-100 High Income ETF (QQQI) and Invesco QQQ ETF (QQQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| QQQI | QQQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.27 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.32 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.34 | 1.36 | -0.03 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.64 | 2.97 | -0.33 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.36 | 11.09 | +0.27 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
QQQI vs. QQQ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum QQQI drawdown since its inception was -20.00%, smaller than the maximum QQQ drawdown of -82.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QQQI and QQQ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| QQQI | QQQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -20.00% | -82.97% | +62.97% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.61% | -11.96% | +2.35% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -22.77% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -35.12% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -35.12% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.36% | -3.89% | +0.53% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.21% | -32.76% | +30.55% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.22% | 3.19% | -0.97% |
Volatility
QQQI vs. QQQ - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for NEOS Nasdaq-100 High Income ETF (QQQI) is 6.09%, while Invesco QQQ ETF (QQQ) has a volatility of 7.61%. This indicates that QQQI experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QQQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| QQQI | QQQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.09% | 7.61% | -1.52% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.33% | 13.80% | -2.47% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.09% | 17.19% | -3.10% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.35% | 22.56% | -5.21% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.35% | 22.38% | -5.03% |
QQQI vs. QQQ - Expense Ratio Comparison
QQQI has a 0.68% expense ratio, which is higher than QQQ's 0.18% expense ratio.
Dividends
QQQI vs. QQQ - Dividend Comparison
QQQI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 13.63%, more than QQQ's 0.39% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QQQ Invesco QQQ ETF | 0.39% | 0.45% | 0.56% | 0.62% | 0.80% | 0.43% | 0.55% | 0.74% | 0.91% | 0.84% | 1.06% | 0.99% |
QQQI NEOS Nasdaq-100 High Income ETF | 13.63% | 13.82% | 12.85% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.99, QQQI and QQQ move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
QQQ has higher volatility (7.61%) compared to QQQI (6.09%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QQQI dropped -20.00% vs QQQ's -82.97%.
On 1-year performance, QQQ leads with 35.35% vs 25.21% for QQQI. On fees, QQQ is cheaper at 0.18% per year. On volatility, QQQI has been the lower-risk option at 6.09%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, QQQ has performed better with a 35.35% return vs 25.21%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
QQQ is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.68% for QQQI.
QQQI has the higher dividend yield at 13.63%, compared with 0.39% for QQQ.
They also come from different issuers: Neos and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.68% for QQQI and 0.18% for QQQ.
QQQ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.07 vs 1.80), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for QQQI and QQQ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer