PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
QQQI vs. SPYI
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

QQQI vs. SPYI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in NEOS Nasdaq-100 High Income ETF (QQQI) and NEOS S&P 500 High Income ETF (SPYI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QQQI achieves a 9.81% return, which is significantly higher than SPYI's 5.75% return.


QQQI

1D
2.90%
1M
0.16%
YTD
9.81%
6M
8.76%
1Y
25.21%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

SPYI

1D
1.58%
1M
-0.20%
YTD
5.75%
6M
5.57%
1Y
19.58%
3Y*
15.36%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

QQQI vs. SPYI - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
QQQI
NEOS Nasdaq-100 High Income ETF
9.81%18.62%19.44%
SPYI
NEOS S&P 500 High Income ETF
5.75%16.67%16.11%

Correlation

The correlation between QQQI and SPYI is 0.94, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.94

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 30, 2024

0.94

The correlation between QQQI and SPYI has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.94 to 0.94 - a consistent structural relationship.

QQQI vs. SPYI - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
QQQI
SPYI

Technology

53.3%
35.5%

Communication Services

15.7%
11.2%

Consumer Cyclical

12.1%
10.1%

Consumer Defensive

7.7%
4.9%

Healthcare

4.3%
8.5%

Industrials

3.3%
8.4%

Utilities

1.5%
2.3%

Basic Materials

1.2%
1.8%

Energy

0.7%
3.5%

Financial Services

0.3%
11.8%

Real Estate

0.1%
2.0%

Technology

QQQI
53.3%
SPYI
35.5%

Communication Services

QQQI
15.7%
SPYI
11.2%

Consumer Cyclical

QQQI
12.1%
SPYI
10.1%

Consumer Defensive

QQQI
7.7%
SPYI
4.9%

Healthcare

QQQI
4.3%
SPYI
8.5%

Industrials

QQQI
3.3%
SPYI
8.4%

Utilities

QQQI
1.5%
SPYI
2.3%

Basic Materials

QQQI
1.2%
SPYI
1.8%

Energy

QQQI
0.7%
SPYI
3.5%

Financial Services

QQQI
0.3%
SPYI
11.8%

Real Estate

QQQI
0.1%
SPYI
2.0%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

QQQI vs. SPYI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QQQI
QQQI Risk / Return Rank: 6767
Overall Rank
QQQI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6666
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QQQI Sortino Ratio Rank: 6262
Sortino Ratio Rank
QQQI Omega Ratio Rank: 6969
Omega Ratio Rank
QQQI Calmar Ratio Rank: 6464
Calmar Ratio Rank
QQQI Martin Ratio Rank: 7474
Martin Ratio Rank

SPYI
SPYI Risk / Return Rank: 7373
Overall Rank
SPYI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7474
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPYI Sortino Ratio Rank: 7171
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPYI Omega Ratio Rank: 7878
Omega Ratio Rank
SPYI Calmar Ratio Rank: 6262
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPYI Martin Ratio Rank: 8080
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QQQI vs. SPYI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for NEOS Nasdaq-100 High Income ETF (QQQI) and NEOS S&P 500 High Income ETF (SPYI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


QQQISPYIDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.15

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.27

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.34

1.38

-0.04

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.64

2.55

+0.09

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.36

12.86

-1.50

QQQI vs. SPYI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QQQI Sharpe Ratio is 1.80, which is comparable to the SPYI Sharpe Ratio of 1.95. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QQQI and SPYI, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

QQQI vs. SPYI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QQQI drawdown since its inception was -20.00%, which is greater than SPYI's maximum drawdown of -16.47%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QQQI and SPYI.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


QQQISPYIDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-20.00%

-16.47%

-3.53%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.61%

-7.72%

-1.89%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.47%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.36%

-2.31%

-1.05%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.21%

-1.81%

-0.40%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.22%

1.53%

+0.69%

Volatility

QQQI vs. SPYI - Volatility Comparison

NEOS Nasdaq-100 High Income ETF (QQQI) has a higher volatility of 6.09% compared to NEOS S&P 500 High Income ETF (SPYI) at 3.59%. This indicates that QQQI's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SPYI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


QQQISPYIDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.09%

3.59%

+2.50%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.33%

8.07%

+3.26%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.09%

10.10%

+3.99%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.35%

13.00%

+4.35%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.35%

13.00%

+4.35%

QQQI vs. SPYI - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both QQQI and SPYI have an expense ratio of 0.68%.


Dividends

QQQI vs. SPYI - Dividend Comparison

QQQI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 13.63%, more than SPYI's 11.86% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022
QQQI
NEOS Nasdaq-100 High Income ETF
13.63%13.82%12.85%0.00%0.00%
SPYI
NEOS S&P 500 High Income ETF
11.86%11.70%12.04%12.01%4.10%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.94, QQQI and SPYI move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

QQQI has higher volatility (6.09%) compared to SPYI (3.59%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QQQI dropped -20.00% vs SPYI's -16.47%.

On 1-year performance, QQQI leads with 25.21% vs 19.58% for SPYI. Both ETFs have the same 0.68% expense ratio. On volatility, SPYI has been the lower-risk option at 3.59%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, QQQI has performed better with a 25.21% return vs 19.58%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

QQQI and SPYI have the same expense ratio: 0.68% per year.

QQQI has the higher dividend yield at 13.63%, compared with 11.86% for SPYI.

QQQI is categorized as Nasdaq-100, while SPYI is Derivative Income.

SPYI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.95 vs 1.80), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for QQQI and SPYI

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer