FDIS vs. IMMR

Last updated Jun 9, 2026

FDIS (Fidelity MSCI Consumer Discretionary Index ETF) is Consumer Discretionary Equities fund tracking the MSCI USA IMI Consumer Discretionary Index, while IMMR (Immersion Corporation) is a stock. Over the past 10 years, FDIS returned 13.67%/yr vs 1.41%/yr for IMMR. At a 0.43 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

FDIS vs. IMMR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity MSCI Consumer Discretionary Index ETF (FDIS) and Immersion Corporation (IMMR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FDIS achieves a -1.68% return, which is significantly lower than IMMR's 0.39% return. Over the past 10 years, FDIS has outperformed IMMR with an annualized return of 13.67%, while IMMR has yielded a comparatively lower 1.41% annualized return.

FDIS

• 1D: 0.65%
• 1M: -3.14%
• YTD: -1.68%
• 6M: -0.61%
• 1Y: 10.04%
• 3Y*: 13.77%
• 5Y*: 5.87%
• 10Y*: 13.67%

IMMR

• 1D: 4.71%
• 1M: -0.15%
• YTD: 0.39%
• 6M: -3.03%
• 1Y: -10.21%
• 3Y*: -2.01%
• 5Y*: -3.62%
• 10Y*: 1.41%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FDIS vs. IMMR - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
FDIS Fidelity MSCI Consumer Discretionary Index ETF	-1.68%	5.67%	24.43%	40.48%	-35.23%	24.25%	49.50%	27.44%	-0.88%	22.96%
IMMR Immersion Corporation	0.39%	-18.30%	26.47%	3.43%	23.12%	-49.42%	51.95%	-17.08%	26.91%	-33.58%

Correlation

The correlation between FDIS and IMMR is 0.51, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.51
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.46
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.48
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.44
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 25, 2013	0.43

The correlation between FDIS and IMMR has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.43 to 0.51 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

FDIS vs. IMMR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FDIS

FDIS Risk / Return Rank: 19
FDIS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 19
FDIS Sortino Ratio Rank: 19
FDIS Omega Ratio Rank: 18
FDIS Calmar Ratio Rank: 18
FDIS Martin Ratio Rank: 19

IMMR

IMMR Risk / Return Rank: 30
IMMR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 31
IMMR Sortino Ratio Rank: 29
IMMR Omega Ratio Rank: 29
IMMR Calmar Ratio Rank: 31
IMMR Martin Ratio Rank: 31

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FDIS vs. IMMR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity MSCI Consumer Discretionary Index ETF (FDIS) and Immersion Corporation (IMMR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	FDIS	IMMR	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.55	-0.26	+0.81
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.89	-0.11	+1.01
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.10	0.99	+0.12
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.65	-0.33	+0.98
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	2.02	-0.61	+2.63
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

FDIS vs. IMMR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FDIS Sharpe Ratio is 0.55, which is higher than the IMMR Sharpe Ratio of -0.26. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FDIS and IMMR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	FDIS	IMMR	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.55	-0.26	+0.81
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.25	-0.08	+0.33
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.62	0.03	+0.59
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.60	-0.04	+0.65

Drawdowns

FDIS vs. IMMR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FDIS drawdown since its inception was -39.16%, smaller than the maximum IMMR drawdown of -98.66%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FDIS and IMMR.

Drawdown Indicators

	FDIS	IMMR	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-39.16%	-98.66%	+59.50%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-15.50%	-30.86%	+15.36%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-27.43%	-56.90%	+29.47%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-39.16%	-56.90%	+17.74%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-39.16%	-74.29%	+35.13%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-6.20%	-89.65%	+83.45%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-7.49%	-88.21%	+80.72%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.97%	16.77%	-11.80%

Volatility

FDIS vs. IMMR - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Fidelity MSCI Consumer Discretionary Index ETF (FDIS) is 5.35%, while Immersion Corporation (IMMR) has a volatility of 12.61%. This indicates that FDIS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IMMR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FDIS	IMMR	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.35%	12.61%	-7.26%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	13.18%	27.21%	-14.03%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	18.34%	39.79%	-21.45%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	23.89%	45.83%	-21.94%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	22.31%	51.32%	-29.01%

Dividends

FDIS vs. IMMR - Dividend Comparison

FDIS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.74%, less than IMMR's 3.60% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FDIS Fidelity MSCI Consumer Discretionary Index ETF	0.74%	0.75%	0.69%	0.78%	1.00%	0.58%	0.59%	1.14%	1.29%	1.00%	1.62%	1.25%
IMMR Immersion Corporation	3.60%	5.59%	2.06%	3.12%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FDIS and IMMR in my portfolio?

FDIS and IMMR have a correlation of 0.51, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, FDIS or IMMR?

IMMR has higher volatility (12.61%) compared to FDIS (5.35%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FDIS dropped -39.16% vs IMMR's -98.66%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FDIS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.55 vs -0.26), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.