FDIS vs. IMMR
FDIS (Fidelity MSCI Consumer Discretionary Index ETF) is Consumer Discretionary Equities fund tracking the MSCI USA IMI Consumer Discretionary 25/50 Index, while IMMR (Immersion Corporation) is a stock. Over the past 10 years, FDIS returned 13.25%/yr vs -0.41%/yr for IMMR. At a 0.42 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
FDIS vs. IMMR - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FDIS achieves a -0.90% return, which is significantly higher than IMMR's -2.12% return. Over the past 10 years, FDIS has outperformed IMMR with an annualized return of 13.25%, while IMMR has yielded a comparatively lower -0.41% annualized return.
FDIS
- 1D
- -0.77%
- 1M
- -1.24%
- 6M
- -3.89%
- YTD
- -0.90%
- 1Y
- 5.73%
- 3Y*
- 11.54%
- 5Y*
- 5.13%
- 10Y*
- 13.25%
- ALL TIME*
- 12.45%
IMMR
- 1D
- -2.06%
- 1M
- -2.64%
- 6M
- 1.39%
- YTD
- -2.12%
- 1Y
- -14.13%
- 3Y*
- 1.05%
- 5Y*
- -1.45%
- 10Y*
- -0.41%
- ALL TIME*
- -3.17%
FDIS vs. IMMR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FDIS Fidelity MSCI Consumer Discretionary Index ETF | -0.90% | 5.67% | 24.43% | 40.48% | -35.23% | 24.25% | 49.50% | 27.44% | -0.88% | 22.96% |
IMMR Immersion Corporation | -2.12% | -18.30% | 26.47% | 3.43% | 23.12% | -49.42% | 51.95% | -17.08% | 26.91% | -33.58% |
Correlation
The correlation between FDIS and IMMR is 0.45, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.45 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.44 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.48 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.43 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 24, 2013 | 0.42 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FDIS vs. IMMR — Risk / Return Rank
FDIS
IMMR
FDIS vs. IMMR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity MSCI Consumer Discretionary Index ETF (FDIS) and Immersion Corporation (IMMR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| FDIS | IMMR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.65 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.82 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.07 | 0.97 | +0.09 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.37 | -0.56 | +0.93 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.10 | -1.22 | +2.32 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
FDIS vs. IMMR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FDIS drawdown since its inception was -39.16%, smaller than the maximum IMMR drawdown of -98.66%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FDIS and IMMR.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FDIS | IMMR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -39.16% | -98.66% | +59.50% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -15.50% | -25.48% | +9.98% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -27.43% | -56.90% | +29.47% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -39.16% | -56.90% | +17.74% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -39.16% | -74.29% | +35.13% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.45% | -89.91% | +84.46% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.47% | -88.21% | +80.74% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.20% | 15.11% | -9.91% |
Volatility
FDIS vs. IMMR - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Fidelity MSCI Consumer Discretionary Index ETF (FDIS) is 5.26%, while Immersion Corporation (IMMR) has a volatility of 11.39%. This indicates that FDIS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IMMR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FDIS | IMMR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.26% | 11.39% | -6.13% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.02% | 27.95% | -13.93% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.87% | 40.69% | -21.82% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 24.01% | 45.82% | -21.81% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.33% | 50.93% | -28.60% |
Dividends
FDIS vs. IMMR - Dividend Comparison
FDIS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.74%, less than IMMR's 4.90% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FDIS Fidelity MSCI Consumer Discretionary Index ETF | 0.74% | 0.75% | 0.69% | 0.78% | 1.00% | 0.58% | 0.59% | 1.14% | 1.29% | 1.00% | 1.62% | 1.25% |
IMMR Immersion Corporation | 4.90% | 5.59% | 2.06% | 3.12% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FDIS and IMMR have a correlation of 0.45, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
IMMR has higher volatility (11.39%) compared to FDIS (5.26%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FDIS dropped -39.16% vs IMMR's -98.66%.
FDIS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.31 vs -0.35), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FDIS and IMMR
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer