FCOM vs. RBIL
FCOM (Fidelity MSCI Communication Services Index ETF) and RBIL (F/m Ultrashort Treasury Inflation-Protected Security (TIPS) ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - FCOM is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the MSCI USA IMI Telecommunication Services 25/50 Index, while RBIL is a Inflation-Protected Bonds fund tracking the Bloomberg US Ultrashort TIPS 1-13 Months Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, FCOM returned 19.84% vs 4.57% for RBIL. At a correlation of -0.21, they often move in opposite directions. FCOM charges 0.08%/yr vs 0.17%/yr for RBIL.
Performance
FCOM vs. RBIL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FCOM achieves a -0.68% return, which is significantly lower than RBIL's 2.70% return.
FCOM
- 1D
- 0.93%
- 1M
- -1.60%
- YTD
- -0.68%
- 6M
- 0.29%
- 1Y
- 19.84%
- 3Y*
- 23.97%
- 5Y*
- 7.62%
- 10Y*
- 12.03%
RBIL
- 1D
- 0.06%
- 1M
- 0.38%
- YTD
- 2.70%
- 6M
- 2.79%
- 1Y
- 4.57%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
FCOM vs. RBIL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
FCOM Fidelity MSCI Communication Services Index ETF | -0.68% | 21.97% |
RBIL F/m Ultrashort Treasury Inflation-Protected Security (TIPS) ETF | 2.70% | 2.91% |
Correlation
The correlation between FCOM and RBIL is -0.23, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.23 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 26, 2025 | -0.21 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FCOM vs. RBIL — Risk / Return Rank
FCOM
RBIL
FCOM vs. RBIL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity MSCI Communication Services Index ETF (FCOM) and F/m Ultrashort Treasury Inflation-Protected Security (TIPS) ETF (RBIL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FCOM | RBIL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -3.71 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -5.97 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.23 | 2.39 | -1.16 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.48 | 17.00 | -15.52 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.61 | 70.66 | -65.05 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FCOM | RBIL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.30 | 5.01 | -3.71 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.36 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.58 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.57 | 4.28 | -3.71 |
Drawdowns
FCOM vs. RBIL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FCOM drawdown since its inception was -46.76%, which is greater than RBIL's maximum drawdown of -0.50%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FCOM and RBIL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FCOM | RBIL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -46.76% | -0.50% | -46.26% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.48% | -0.27% | -13.21% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -21.16% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -46.76% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -46.76% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.00% | 0.00% | -4.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.66% | -0.06% | -8.60% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.55% | 0.07% | +3.48% |
Volatility
FCOM vs. RBIL - Volatility Comparison
Fidelity MSCI Communication Services Index ETF (FCOM) has a higher volatility of 4.36% compared to F/m Ultrashort Treasury Inflation-Protected Security (TIPS) ETF (RBIL) at 0.30%. This indicates that FCOM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RBIL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FCOM | RBIL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.36% | 0.30% | +4.06% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.06% | 0.79% | +10.27% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.40% | 0.92% | +14.48% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.17% | 1.05% | +20.12% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.95% | 1.05% | +19.90% |
FCOM vs. RBIL - Expense Ratio Comparison
FCOM has a 0.08% expense ratio, which is lower than RBIL's 0.17% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
FCOM vs. RBIL - Dividend Comparison
FCOM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.94%, less than RBIL's 4.60% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FCOM Fidelity MSCI Communication Services Index ETF | 0.94% | 0.88% | 0.87% | 0.77% | 1.04% | 0.90% | 0.68% | 0.86% | 2.78% | 11.70% | 2.27% | 2.92% |
RBIL F/m Ultrashort Treasury Inflation-Protected Security (TIPS) ETF | 4.60% | 3.65% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FCOM and RBIL have a correlation of -0.23, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FCOM has higher volatility (4.36%) compared to RBIL (0.30%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FCOM dropped -46.76% vs RBIL's -0.50%.
On 1-year performance, FCOM leads with 19.84% vs 4.57% for RBIL. On fees, FCOM is cheaper at 0.08% per year. On volatility, RBIL has been the lower-risk option at 0.30%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, FCOM has performed better with a 19.84% return vs 4.57%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
FCOM is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.17% for RBIL.
RBIL has the higher dividend yield at 4.60%, compared with 0.94% for FCOM.
FCOM is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while RBIL is Inflation-Protected Bonds. FCOM tracks MSCI USA IMI Telecommunication Services 25/50 Index, while RBIL tracks Bloomberg US Ultrashort TIPS 1-13 Months Index. They also come from different issuers: Fidelity and F/m. Their fees differ too: 0.08% for FCOM and 0.17% for RBIL.
RBIL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (5.01 vs 1.30), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FCOM and RBIL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer