PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
RBIL vs. IBIC
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

RBIL vs. IBIC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in F/m Ultrashort Treasury Inflation-Protected Security (TIPS) ETF (RBIL) and iShares iBonds Oct 2026 Term TIPS ETF (IBIC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

RBIL vs. IBIC - Yearly Performance Comparison


Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RBIL achieves a 1.65% return, which is significantly higher than IBIC's 1.45% return.


RBIL

1D
-0.08%
1M
1.03%
YTD
1.65%
6M
2.23%
1Y
3.87%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

IBIC

1D
-0.04%
1M
0.86%
YTD
1.45%
6M
2.09%
1Y
4.26%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


RBIL vs. IBIC - Expense Ratio Comparison

RBIL has a 0.17% expense ratio, which is higher than IBIC's 0.10% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Return for Risk

RBIL vs. IBIC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RBIL
RBIL Risk / Return Rank: 9898
Overall Rank
RBIL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9898
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RBIL Sortino Ratio Rank: 9999
Sortino Ratio Rank
RBIL Omega Ratio Rank: 9898
Omega Ratio Rank
RBIL Calmar Ratio Rank: 9898
Calmar Ratio Rank
RBIL Martin Ratio Rank: 9898
Martin Ratio Rank

IBIC
IBIC Risk / Return Rank: 9898
Overall Rank
IBIC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9898
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IBIC Sortino Ratio Rank: 9999
Sortino Ratio Rank
IBIC Omega Ratio Rank: 9898
Omega Ratio Rank
IBIC Calmar Ratio Rank: 9898
Calmar Ratio Rank
IBIC Martin Ratio Rank: 9898
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RBIL vs. IBIC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for F/m Ultrashort Treasury Inflation-Protected Security (TIPS) ETF (RBIL) and iShares iBonds Oct 2026 Term TIPS ETF (IBIC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


RBILIBICDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

3.76

3.71

+0.05

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

6.07

6.38

-0.31

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

2.00

1.91

+0.09

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

7.98

8.93

-0.95

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

35.17

32.20

+2.97

RBIL vs. IBIC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RBIL Sharpe Ratio is 3.76, which is comparable to the IBIC Sharpe Ratio of 3.71. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RBIL and IBIC, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


RBILIBICDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.76

3.71

+0.05

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

4.10

3.42

+0.67

Correlation

The correlation between RBIL and IBIC is 0.59, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Dividends

RBIL vs. IBIC - Dividend Comparison

RBIL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.42%, more than IBIC's 4.37% yield.


Drawdowns

RBIL vs. IBIC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RBIL drawdown since its inception was -0.50%, smaller than the maximum IBIC drawdown of -0.90%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RBIL and IBIC.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


RBILIBICDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-0.50%

-0.90%

+0.40%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-0.50%

-0.46%

-0.04%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.08%

-0.04%

-0.04%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.06%

-0.10%

+0.04%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.11%

0.13%

-0.02%

Volatility

RBIL vs. IBIC - Volatility Comparison

F/m Ultrashort Treasury Inflation-Protected Security (TIPS) ETF (RBIL) has a higher volatility of 0.58% compared to iShares iBonds Oct 2026 Term TIPS ETF (IBIC) at 0.37%. This indicates that RBIL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IBIC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


RBILIBICDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.58%

0.37%

+0.21%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

0.67%

0.62%

+0.05%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.04%

1.16%

-0.12%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

1.03%

1.61%

-0.58%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

1.03%

1.61%

-0.58%