RBIL vs. STIP
RBIL (F/m Ultrashort Treasury Inflation-Protected Security (TIPS) ETF) and STIP (iShares 0-5 Year TIPS Bond ETF) are both Inflation-Protected Bonds funds - RBIL tracks the Bloomberg US Ultrashort TIPS 1-13 Months Index while STIP tracks the Bloomberg US Treasury Inflation-Protected Securities (TIPS) 0-5 Years Index (Series-L). Both are passively managed. Over the past year, RBIL returned 4.55% vs 4.64% for STIP. At a 0.37 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. RBIL charges 0.17%/yr vs 0.06%/yr for STIP.
Performance
RBIL vs. STIP - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, RBIL achieves a 2.63% return, which is significantly higher than STIP's 1.77% return.
RBIL
- 1D
- -0.04%
- 1M
- 0.41%
- YTD
- 2.63%
- 6M
- 2.66%
- 1Y
- 4.55%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
STIP
- 1D
- -0.23%
- 1M
- 0.00%
- YTD
- 1.77%
- 6M
- 1.79%
- 1Y
- 4.64%
- 3Y*
- 5.11%
- 5Y*
- 3.31%
- 10Y*
- 3.13%
RBIL vs. STIP - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
RBIL F/m Ultrashort Treasury Inflation-Protected Security (TIPS) ETF | 2.63% | 2.91% |
STIP iShares 0-5 Year TIPS Bond ETF | 1.77% | 4.33% |
Correlation
The correlation between RBIL and STIP is 0.37, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.37 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 26, 2025 | 0.37 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
RBIL vs. STIP — Risk / Return Rank
RBIL
STIP
RBIL vs. STIP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for F/m Ultrashort Treasury Inflation-Protected Security (TIPS) ETF (RBIL) and iShares 0-5 Year TIPS Bond ETF (STIP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| RBIL | STIP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.97 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.75 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 2.38 | 1.65 | +0.73 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 16.96 | 6.41 | +10.55 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 70.30 | 25.52 | +44.78 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| RBIL | STIP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 5.00 | 3.04 | +1.97 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 1.21 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 1.28 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 4.20 | 1.06 | +3.14 |
Drawdowns
RBIL vs. STIP - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RBIL drawdown since its inception was -0.50%, smaller than the maximum STIP drawdown of -5.50%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RBIL and STIP.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| RBIL | STIP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -0.50% | -5.50% | +5.00% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -0.27% | -0.69% | +0.42% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -0.95% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -5.50% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -5.50% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.07% | -0.30% | +0.23% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.06% | -0.99% | +0.93% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.06% | 0.18% | -0.12% |
Volatility
RBIL vs. STIP - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for F/m Ultrashort Treasury Inflation-Protected Security (TIPS) ETF (RBIL) is 0.26%, while iShares 0-5 Year TIPS Bond ETF (STIP) has a volatility of 0.45%. This indicates that RBIL experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than STIP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| RBIL | STIP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.26% | 0.45% | -0.19% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 0.80% | 1.02% | -0.22% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.92% | 1.47% | -0.55% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 1.05% | 2.75% | -1.70% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 1.05% | 2.45% | -1.40% |
RBIL vs. STIP - Expense Ratio Comparison
RBIL has a 0.17% expense ratio, which is higher than STIP's 0.06% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
RBIL vs. STIP - Dividend Comparison
RBIL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.60%, more than STIP's 4.31% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RBIL F/m Ultrashort Treasury Inflation-Protected Security (TIPS) ETF | 4.60% | 3.65% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
STIP iShares 0-5 Year TIPS Bond ETF | 4.31% | 4.11% | 2.62% | 2.84% | 6.04% | 4.15% | 1.40% | 2.06% | 2.44% | 1.59% | 0.89% |
Frequently Asked Questions
RBIL and STIP have a correlation of 0.37, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
STIP has higher volatility (0.45%) compared to RBIL (0.26%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RBIL dropped -0.50% vs STIP's -5.50%.
On 1-year performance, STIP leads with 4.64% vs 4.55% for RBIL. On fees, STIP is cheaper at 0.06% per year. On volatility, RBIL has been the lower-risk option at 0.26%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, STIP has performed better with a 4.64% return vs 4.55%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
STIP is cheaper with a 0.06% expense ratio, compared with 0.17% for RBIL.
RBIL has the higher dividend yield at 4.60%, compared with 4.31% for STIP.
RBIL tracks Bloomberg US Ultrashort TIPS 1-13 Months Index, while STIP tracks Bloomberg US Treasury Inflation-Protected Securities (TIPS) 0-5 Years Index (Series-L). They also come from different issuers: F/m and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.17% for RBIL and 0.06% for STIP.
RBIL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (5.00 vs 3.04), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for RBIL and STIP
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer