FCOM vs. PSCC
FCOM (Fidelity MSCI Communication Services Index ETF) and PSCC (Invesco S&P SmallCap Consumer Staples ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - FCOM is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the MSCI USA IMI Telecommunication Services 25/50 Index, while PSCC is a Consumer Staples Equities fund tracking the S&P Small Cap 600 Capped Consumer Staples. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, FCOM returned 11.60%/yr vs 6.99%/yr for PSCC. At a 0.47 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. FCOM charges 0.08%/yr vs 0.29%/yr for PSCC.
Performance
FCOM vs. PSCC - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FCOM achieves a -3.17% return, which is significantly lower than PSCC's 12.79% return. Over the past 10 years, FCOM has outperformed PSCC with an annualized return of 11.60%, while PSCC has yielded a comparatively lower 6.99% annualized return.
FCOM
- 1D
- 0.08%
- 1M
- -4.97%
- YTD
- -3.17%
- 6M
- -1.90%
- 1Y
- 14.88%
- 3Y*
- 22.19%
- 5Y*
- 6.79%
- 10Y*
- 11.60%
PSCC
- 1D
- 0.93%
- 1M
- 7.91%
- YTD
- 12.79%
- 6M
- 9.16%
- 1Y
- 4.29%
- 3Y*
- 0.56%
- 5Y*
- 1.00%
- 10Y*
- 6.99%
FCOM vs. PSCC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FCOM Fidelity MSCI Communication Services Index ETF | -3.17% | 26.06% | 33.05% | 44.65% | -38.97% | 13.88% | 28.33% | 26.69% | -5.33% | 8.20% |
PSCC Invesco S&P SmallCap Consumer Staples ETF | 12.79% | -16.47% | 0.98% | 14.83% | -6.66% | 28.82% | 11.17% | 17.39% | -6.72% | 9.72% |
Correlation
The correlation between FCOM and PSCC is 0.20, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.20 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.32 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.45 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.46 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 24, 2013 | 0.47 |
Over the past year, the correlation between FCOM and PSCC has dropped to 0.20 - well below their long-term average of 0.47, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
FCOM vs. PSCC - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
FCOM
PSCC
Communication Services
-
Technology
-
Consumer Cyclical
Real Estate
-
Basic Materials
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
-
Financial Services
-
-
Healthcare
-
-
Industrials
-
Utilities
-
-
Communication Services
FCOM
PSCC
-
Technology
FCOM
PSCC
-
Consumer Cyclical
FCOM
PSCC
Real Estate
FCOM
PSCC
-
Basic Materials
FCOM
-
PSCC
Consumer Defensive
FCOM
-
PSCC
Energy
FCOM
-
PSCC
-
Financial Services
FCOM
-
PSCC
-
Healthcare
FCOM
-
PSCC
-
Industrials
FCOM
-
PSCC
Utilities
FCOM
-
PSCC
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FCOM vs. PSCC — Risk / Return Rank
FCOM
PSCC
FCOM vs. PSCC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity MSCI Communication Services Index ETF (FCOM) and Invesco S&P SmallCap Consumer Staples ETF (PSCC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| FCOM | PSCC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.71 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.00 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.18 | 1.06 | +0.12 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.11 | 0.28 | +0.83 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.05 | 0.49 | +3.56 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
FCOM vs. PSCC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FCOM drawdown since its inception was -46.76%, which is greater than PSCC's maximum drawdown of -33.61%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FCOM and PSCC.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FCOM | PSCC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -46.76% | -33.61% | -13.15% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.48% | -15.17% | +1.69% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -21.16% | -23.36% | +2.20% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -46.76% | -23.36% | -23.40% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -46.76% | -33.61% | -13.15% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.40% | -11.94% | +5.54% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.66% | -5.98% | -2.68% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.68% | 8.68% | -5.00% |
Volatility
FCOM vs. PSCC - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Fidelity MSCI Communication Services Index ETF (FCOM) is 4.08%, while Invesco S&P SmallCap Consumer Staples ETF (PSCC) has a volatility of 4.40%. This indicates that FCOM experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PSCC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FCOM | PSCC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.08% | 4.40% | -0.32% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.19% | 11.04% | +0.15% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.43% | 16.61% | -1.18% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.19% | 18.25% | +2.94% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.96% | 19.30% | +1.66% |
FCOM vs. PSCC - Expense Ratio Comparison
FCOM has a 0.08% expense ratio, which is lower than PSCC's 0.29% expense ratio.
Dividends
FCOM vs. PSCC - Dividend Comparison
FCOM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.96%, less than PSCC's 1.97% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FCOM Fidelity MSCI Communication Services Index ETF | 0.96% | 0.88% | 0.87% | 0.77% | 1.04% | 0.90% | 0.68% | 0.86% | 2.78% | 11.70% | 2.27% | 2.92% |
PSCC Invesco S&P SmallCap Consumer Staples ETF | 1.97% | 2.35% | 1.88% | 1.49% | 1.29% | 1.21% | 1.59% | 1.77% | 0.94% | 1.25% | 1.48% | 1.34% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FCOM and PSCC have a correlation of 0.20, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
PSCC has higher volatility (4.40%) compared to FCOM (4.08%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FCOM dropped -46.76% vs PSCC's -33.61%.
On 10-year performance, FCOM leads with 11.60% vs 6.99% for PSCC. On fees, FCOM is cheaper at 0.08% per year. On volatility, FCOM has been the lower-risk option at 4.08%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, FCOM has performed better with a 11.60% return vs 6.99%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
FCOM is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.29% for PSCC.
PSCC has the higher dividend yield at 1.97%, compared with 0.96% for FCOM.
FCOM is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while PSCC is Consumer Staples Equities. FCOM tracks MSCI USA IMI Telecommunication Services 25/50 Index, while PSCC tracks S&P Small Cap 600 Capped Consumer Staples. They also come from different issuers: Fidelity and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.08% for FCOM and 0.29% for PSCC.
FCOM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.97 vs 0.26), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FCOM and PSCC
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer