PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FCOM vs. PSCC
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FCOM vs. PSCC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity MSCI Communication Services Index ETF (FCOM) and Invesco S&P SmallCap Consumer Staples ETF (PSCC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FCOM achieves a -3.17% return, which is significantly lower than PSCC's 12.79% return. Over the past 10 years, FCOM has outperformed PSCC with an annualized return of 11.60%, while PSCC has yielded a comparatively lower 6.99% annualized return.


FCOM

1D
0.08%
1M
-4.97%
YTD
-3.17%
6M
-1.90%
1Y
14.88%
3Y*
22.19%
5Y*
6.79%
10Y*
11.60%

PSCC

1D
0.93%
1M
7.91%
YTD
12.79%
6M
9.16%
1Y
4.29%
3Y*
0.56%
5Y*
1.00%
10Y*
6.99%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FCOM vs. PSCC - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FCOM
Fidelity MSCI Communication Services Index ETF
-3.17%26.06%33.05%44.65%-38.97%13.88%28.33%26.69%-5.33%8.20%
PSCC
Invesco S&P SmallCap Consumer Staples ETF
12.79%-16.47%0.98%14.83%-6.66%28.82%11.17%17.39%-6.72%9.72%

Correlation

The correlation between FCOM and PSCC is 0.20, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.20

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.32

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.45

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.46

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 24, 2013

0.47

Over the past year, the correlation between FCOM and PSCC has dropped to 0.20 - well below their long-term average of 0.47, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

FCOM vs. PSCC - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
FCOM
PSCC

Communication Services

98.5%

-

Technology

1.2%

-

Consumer Cyclical

0.3%
2.9%

Real Estate

0.1%

-

Basic Materials

-

3.8%

Consumer Defensive

-

90.4%

Energy

-

-

Financial Services

-

-

Healthcare

-

-

Industrials

-

3.0%

Utilities

-

-

Communication Services

FCOM
98.5%
PSCC

-

Technology

FCOM
1.2%
PSCC

-

Consumer Cyclical

FCOM
0.3%
PSCC
2.9%

Real Estate

FCOM
0.1%
PSCC

-

Basic Materials

FCOM

-

PSCC
3.8%

Consumer Defensive

FCOM

-

PSCC
90.4%

Energy

FCOM

-

PSCC

-

Financial Services

FCOM

-

PSCC

-

Healthcare

FCOM

-

PSCC

-

Industrials

FCOM

-

PSCC
3.0%

Utilities

FCOM

-

PSCC

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FCOM vs. PSCC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FCOM
FCOM Risk / Return Rank: 3030
Overall Rank
FCOM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3030
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FCOM Sortino Ratio Rank: 3131
Sortino Ratio Rank
FCOM Omega Ratio Rank: 2929
Omega Ratio Rank
FCOM Calmar Ratio Rank: 2626
Calmar Ratio Rank
FCOM Martin Ratio Rank: 3131
Martin Ratio Rank

PSCC
PSCC Risk / Return Rank: 1313
Overall Rank
PSCC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1414
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PSCC Sortino Ratio Rank: 1313
Sortino Ratio Rank
PSCC Omega Ratio Rank: 1313
Omega Ratio Rank
PSCC Calmar Ratio Rank: 1313
Calmar Ratio Rank
PSCC Martin Ratio Rank: 1212
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FCOM vs. PSCC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity MSCI Communication Services Index ETF (FCOM) and Invesco S&P SmallCap Consumer Staples ETF (PSCC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FCOMPSCCDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.71

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.00

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.18

1.06

+0.12

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.11

0.28

+0.83

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.05

0.49

+3.56

FCOM vs. PSCC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FCOM Sharpe Ratio is 0.97, which is higher than the PSCC Sharpe Ratio of 0.26. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FCOM and PSCC, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FCOM vs. PSCC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FCOM drawdown since its inception was -46.76%, which is greater than PSCC's maximum drawdown of -33.61%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FCOM and PSCC.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FCOMPSCCDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-46.76%

-33.61%

-13.15%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.48%

-15.17%

+1.69%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-21.16%

-23.36%

+2.20%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-46.76%

-23.36%

-23.40%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-46.76%

-33.61%

-13.15%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-6.40%

-11.94%

+5.54%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.66%

-5.98%

-2.68%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.68%

8.68%

-5.00%

Volatility

FCOM vs. PSCC - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Fidelity MSCI Communication Services Index ETF (FCOM) is 4.08%, while Invesco S&P SmallCap Consumer Staples ETF (PSCC) has a volatility of 4.40%. This indicates that FCOM experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PSCC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FCOMPSCCDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.08%

4.40%

-0.32%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.19%

11.04%

+0.15%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.43%

16.61%

-1.18%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.19%

18.25%

+2.94%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.96%

19.30%

+1.66%

FCOM vs. PSCC - Expense Ratio Comparison

FCOM has a 0.08% expense ratio, which is lower than PSCC's 0.29% expense ratio.


Dividends

FCOM vs. PSCC - Dividend Comparison

FCOM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.96%, less than PSCC's 1.97% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FCOM
Fidelity MSCI Communication Services Index ETF
0.96%0.88%0.87%0.77%1.04%0.90%0.68%0.86%2.78%11.70%2.27%2.92%
PSCC
Invesco S&P SmallCap Consumer Staples ETF
1.97%2.35%1.88%1.49%1.29%1.21%1.59%1.77%0.94%1.25%1.48%1.34%

Frequently Asked Questions


FCOM and PSCC have a correlation of 0.20, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PSCC has higher volatility (4.40%) compared to FCOM (4.08%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FCOM dropped -46.76% vs PSCC's -33.61%.

On 10-year performance, FCOM leads with 11.60% vs 6.99% for PSCC. On fees, FCOM is cheaper at 0.08% per year. On volatility, FCOM has been the lower-risk option at 4.08%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, FCOM has performed better with a 11.60% return vs 6.99%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

FCOM is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.29% for PSCC.

PSCC has the higher dividend yield at 1.97%, compared with 0.96% for FCOM.

FCOM is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while PSCC is Consumer Staples Equities. FCOM tracks MSCI USA IMI Telecommunication Services 25/50 Index, while PSCC tracks S&P Small Cap 600 Capped Consumer Staples. They also come from different issuers: Fidelity and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.08% for FCOM and 0.29% for PSCC.

FCOM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.97 vs 0.26), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FCOM and PSCC

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer