PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
IXP vs. VOO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

IXP vs. VOO

Last updated Jun 23, 2026

IXP (iShares Global Comm Services ETF) and VOO (Vanguard S&P 500 ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - IXP is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the S&P Global 1200 Communication Services 4.5/22.5/45 Capped, while VOO is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, IXP returned 8.96%/yr vs 15.77%/yr for VOO. A 0.79 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. IXP charges 0.43%/yr vs 0.03%/yr for VOO.

Performance

IXP vs. VOO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Global Comm Services ETF (IXP) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IXP achieves a -4.97% return, which is significantly lower than VOO's 9.75% return. Over the past 10 years, IXP has underperformed VOO with an annualized return of 8.96%, while VOO has yielded a comparatively higher 15.77% annualized return.

IXP

1D
-2.54%
1M
-6.54%
YTD
-4.97%
6M
-4.20%
1Y
11.28%
3Y*
21.44%
5Y*
7.71%
10Y*
8.96%

VOO

1D
-0.29%
1M
0.08%
YTD
9.75%
6M
9.30%
1Y
26.77%
3Y*
21.36%
5Y*
13.58%
10Y*
15.77%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IXP vs. VOO - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
IXP
iShares Global Comm Services ETF		-4.97%29.27%31.33%38.80%-33.40%12.77%22.16%25.23%-13.67%6.65%
VOO
Vanguard S&P 500 ETF		9.75%17.82%24.98%26.32%-18.17%28.79%18.32%31.37%-4.50%21.77%

Correlation

The correlation between IXP and VOO is 0.72, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.72

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.76

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.80

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.78

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 9, 2010

0.79

The correlation between IXP and VOO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.72 to 0.80 - a consistent structural relationship.

IXP vs. VOO - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors
IXP
VOO

Communication Services

99.3%
10.5%

Technology

2.0%
39.1%

Real Estate

0.5%
1.8%

Consumer Cyclical

0.2%
9.8%

Basic Materials

-

1.7%

Consumer Defensive

-

4.5%

Energy

-

3.2%

Financial Services

-

10.9%

Healthcare

-

8.3%

Industrials

-

7.6%

Utilities

-

2.5%

Communication Services

IXP
99.3%
VOO
10.5%

Technology

IXP
2.0%
VOO
39.1%

Real Estate

IXP
0.5%
VOO
1.8%

Consumer Cyclical

IXP
0.2%
VOO
9.8%

Basic Materials

IXP

-

VOO
1.7%

Consumer Defensive

IXP

-

VOO
4.5%

Energy

IXP

-

VOO
3.2%

Financial Services

IXP

-

VOO
10.9%

Healthcare

IXP

-

VOO
8.3%

Industrials

IXP

-

VOO
7.6%

Utilities

IXP

-

VOO
2.5%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

iShares Global Comm Services ETF

Vanguard S&P 500 ETF

Often compared with IXP:
IXP vs. XLCIXP vs. FCOMIXP vs. IYZIXP vs. QQQIXP vs. IYWIXP vs. VTIIXP vs. RSPN
Often compared with VOO:
VOO vs. VTIVOO vs. QQQVOO vs. SCHDVOO vs. VTVOO vs. SPYVOO vs. FXAIXVOO vs. VGT

Return for Risk

IXP vs. VOO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
IXP
IXP Risk / Return Rank: 2222
Overall Rank
IXP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2222
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IXP Sortino Ratio Rank: 2222
Sortino Ratio Rank
IXP Omega Ratio Rank: 2121
Omega Ratio Rank
IXP Calmar Ratio Rank: 2121
Calmar Ratio Rank
IXP Martin Ratio Rank: 2424
Martin Ratio Rank
VOO
VOO Risk / Return Rank: 6868
Overall Rank
VOO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7070
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VOO Sortino Ratio Rank: 6767
Sortino Ratio Rank
VOO Omega Ratio Rank: 6969
Omega Ratio Rank
VOO Calmar Ratio Rank: 6363
Calmar Ratio Rank
VOO Martin Ratio Rank: 7474
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IXP vs. VOO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Global Comm Services ETF (IXP) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

IXPVOODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility
0.75
2.17

-1.42

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk
1.21
2.93

-1.72

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.14

1.39

-0.25

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.92

3.02

-2.10

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.01

13.58

-10.57

IXP vs. VOO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IXP Sharpe Ratio is 0.75, which is lower than the VOO Sharpe Ratio of 2.17. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IXP and VOO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Loading charts...

Drawdowns

IXP vs. VOO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IXP drawdown since its inception was -50.11%, which is greater than VOO's maximum drawdown of -33.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IXP and VOO.

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

IXPVOODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-50.11%

-33.99%

-16.12%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.26%

-8.90%

-3.36%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.54%

-18.69%

+1.15%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-44.30%

-24.52%

-19.78%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-44.30%

-33.99%

-10.31%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-8.94%

-1.74%

-7.20%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-11.90%

-3.68%

-8.22%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.76%

1.98%

+1.78%

Volatility

IXP vs. VOO - Volatility Comparison

iShares Global Comm Services ETF (IXP) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) have volatilities of 4.81% and 4.60%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

IXPVOODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.81%

4.60%

+0.21%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.25%

9.73%

+1.52%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.04%

12.39%

+2.65%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.09%

16.90%

+2.19%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.56%

18.05%

+0.51%

IXP vs. VOO - Expense Ratio Comparison

IXP has a 0.43% expense ratio, which is higher than VOO's 0.03% expense ratio.

Dividends

IXP vs. VOO - Dividend Comparison

IXP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.43%, more than VOO's 1.04% yield.

PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IXP
iShares Global Comm Services ETF		3.43%2.98%1.35%1.24%0.62%1.80%0.95%2.18%4.32%3.41%4.02%3.89%
VOO
Vanguard S&P 500 ETF		1.04%1.13%1.24%1.46%1.69%1.25%1.54%1.88%2.06%1.78%2.02%2.10%

Frequently Asked Questions

IXP and VOO have a correlation of 0.72, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

IXP has higher volatility (4.81%) compared to VOO (4.60%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IXP dropped -50.11% vs VOO's -33.99%.

On 10-year performance, VOO leads with 15.77% vs 8.96% for IXP. On fees, VOO is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, VOO has been the lower-risk option at 4.60%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, VOO has performed better with a 15.77% return vs 8.96%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VOO is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.43% for IXP.

IXP has the higher dividend yield at 3.43%, compared with 1.04% for VOO.

IXP is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while VOO is S&P 500. IXP tracks S&P Global 1200 Communication Services 4.5/22.5/45 Capped, while VOO tracks S&P 500 Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.43% for IXP and 0.03% for VOO.

VOO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.17 vs 0.75), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IXP and VOO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer