IXP vs. VTI
IXP (iShares Global Comm Services ETF) and VTI (Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - IXP is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the S&P Global 1200 Communication Services 4.5/22.5/45 Capped, while VTI is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the CRSP US Total Market Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, IXP returned 8.96%/yr vs 15.31%/yr for VTI. A 0.73 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. IXP charges 0.43%/yr vs 0.03%/yr for VTI.
Performance
IXP vs. VTI - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IXP achieves a -4.97% return, which is significantly lower than VTI's 10.35% return. Over the past 10 years, IXP has underperformed VTI with an annualized return of 8.96%, while VTI has yielded a comparatively higher 15.31% annualized return.
IXP
- 1D
- -2.54%
- 1M
- -6.54%
- YTD
- -4.97%
- 6M
- -4.20%
- 1Y
- 11.28%
- 3Y*
- 21.44%
- 5Y*
- 7.71%
- 10Y*
- 8.96%
VTI
- 1D
- -0.32%
- 1M
- 0.55%
- YTD
- 10.35%
- 6M
- 9.59%
- 1Y
- 27.18%
- 3Y*
- 21.19%
- 5Y*
- 12.36%
- 10Y*
- 15.31%
IXP vs. VTI - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IXP iShares Global Comm Services ETF | -4.97% | 29.27% | 31.33% | 38.80% | -33.40% | 12.77% | 22.16% | 25.23% | -13.67% | 6.65% |
VTI Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF | 10.35% | 17.10% | 23.81% | 26.05% | -19.52% | 25.68% | 21.08% | 30.67% | -5.23% | 21.21% |
Correlation
The correlation between IXP and VTI is 0.70, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.70 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.75 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.80 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.78 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 26, 2001 | 0.73 |
The correlation between IXP and VTI has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.70 to 0.80 - a consistent structural relationship.
IXP vs. VTI - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
IXP
VTI
Communication Services
Technology
Real Estate
Consumer Cyclical
Basic Materials
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
Financial Services
-
Healthcare
-
Industrials
-
Utilities
-
Communication Services
IXP
VTI
Technology
IXP
VTI
Real Estate
IXP
VTI
Consumer Cyclical
IXP
VTI
Basic Materials
IXP
-
VTI
Consumer Defensive
IXP
-
VTI
Energy
IXP
-
VTI
Financial Services
IXP
-
VTI
Healthcare
IXP
-
VTI
Industrials
IXP
-
VTI
Utilities
IXP
-
VTI
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IXP vs. VTI — Risk / Return Rank
IXP
VTI
IXP vs. VTI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Global Comm Services ETF (IXP) and Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF (VTI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| IXP | VTI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.39 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.69 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.14 | 1.38 | -0.24 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.92 | 3.06 | -2.14 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.01 | 13.68 | -10.67 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
IXP vs. VTI - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IXP drawdown since its inception was -50.11%, smaller than the maximum VTI drawdown of -55.45%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IXP and VTI.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IXP | VTI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -50.11% | -55.45% | +5.34% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.26% | -8.92% | -3.34% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -17.54% | -19.30% | +1.76% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -44.30% | -25.36% | -18.94% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -44.30% | -35.00% | -9.30% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -8.94% | -1.48% | -7.46% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -11.90% | -8.01% | -3.89% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.76% | 1.99% | +1.77% |
Volatility
IXP vs. VTI - Volatility Comparison
iShares Global Comm Services ETF (IXP) and Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) have volatilities of 4.81% and 4.74%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IXP | VTI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.81% | 4.74% | +0.07% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.25% | 9.96% | +1.29% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.04% | 12.76% | +2.28% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.09% | 17.49% | +1.60% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.56% | 18.35% | +0.21% |
IXP vs. VTI - Expense Ratio Comparison
IXP has a 0.43% expense ratio, which is higher than VTI's 0.03% expense ratio.
Dividends
IXP vs. VTI - Dividend Comparison
IXP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.43%, more than VTI's 1.02% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IXP iShares Global Comm Services ETF | 3.43% | 2.98% | 1.35% | 1.24% | 0.62% | 1.80% | 0.95% | 2.18% | 4.32% | 3.41% | 4.02% | 3.89% |
VTI Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF | 1.02% | 1.12% | 1.27% | 1.44% | 1.66% | 1.21% | 1.42% | 1.78% | 2.04% | 1.71% | 1.92% | 1.98% |
Frequently Asked Questions
IXP and VTI have a correlation of 0.70, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
IXP has higher volatility (4.81%) compared to VTI (4.74%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IXP dropped -50.11% vs VTI's -55.45%.
On 10-year performance, VTI leads with 15.31% vs 8.96% for IXP. On fees, VTI is cheaper at 0.03% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, VTI has performed better with a 15.31% return vs 8.96%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
VTI is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.43% for IXP.
IXP has the higher dividend yield at 3.43%, compared with 1.02% for VTI.
IXP is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while VTI is Large Cap Blend Equities. IXP tracks S&P Global 1200 Communication Services 4.5/22.5/45 Capped, while VTI tracks CRSP US Total Market Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.43% for IXP and 0.03% for VTI.
VTI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.14 vs 0.75), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for IXP and VTI
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer