FCOM vs. FDCF
Compare and contrast key facts about Fidelity MSCI Communication Services Index ETF (FCOM) and Fidelity Disruptive Communications ETF (FDCF).
FCOM and FDCF are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. FCOM is a passively managed fund by Fidelity that tracks the performance of the MSCI USA IMI Telecommunication Services 25/50 Index. It was launched on Oct 21, 2013. FDCF is an actively managed fund by Fidelity. It was launched on Apr 16, 2020.
Performance
FCOM vs. FDCF - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
FCOM vs. FDCF - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
FCOM Fidelity MSCI Communication Services Index ETF | -6.81% | 26.06% | 33.05% | 13.03% |
FDCF Fidelity Disruptive Communications ETF | -10.46% | 27.42% | 28.37% | 16.39% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FCOM achieves a -6.81% return, which is significantly higher than FDCF's -10.46% return.
FCOM
- 1D
- 3.51%
- 1M
- -6.10%
- YTD
- -6.81%
- 6M
- -3.57%
- 1Y
- 22.27%
- 3Y*
- 24.17%
- 5Y*
- 7.26%
- 10Y*
- 11.00%
FDCF
- 1D
- 4.40%
- 1M
- -6.42%
- YTD
- -10.46%
- 6M
- -13.12%
- 1Y
- 17.00%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
FCOM vs. FDCF - Expense Ratio Comparison
FCOM has a 0.08% expense ratio, which is lower than FDCF's 0.50% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
FCOM vs. FDCF — Risk / Return Rank
FCOM
FDCF
FCOM vs. FDCF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity MSCI Communication Services Index ETF (FCOM) and Fidelity Disruptive Communications ETF (FDCF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FCOM | FDCF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.10 | 0.74 | +0.36 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.71 | 1.16 | +0.55 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.23 | 1.16 | +0.08 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.69 | 0.90 | +0.79 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.27 | 2.80 | +3.47 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FCOM | FDCF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.10 | 0.74 | +0.36 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.34 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.53 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.55 | 1.02 | -0.47 |
Correlation
The correlation between FCOM and FDCF is 0.80, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
FCOM vs. FDCF - Dividend Comparison
FCOM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.00%, more than FDCF's 0.04% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FCOM Fidelity MSCI Communication Services Index ETF | 1.00% | 0.88% | 0.87% | 0.77% | 1.04% | 0.90% | 0.68% | 0.86% | 2.78% | 11.70% | 2.27% | 2.92% |
FDCF Fidelity Disruptive Communications ETF | 0.04% | 0.09% | 0.25% | 0.19% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
FCOM vs. FDCF - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FCOM drawdown since its inception was -46.76%, which is greater than FDCF's maximum drawdown of -22.53%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FCOM and FDCF.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| FCOM | FDCF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -46.76% | -22.53% | -24.23% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.48% | -18.10% | +4.62% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -46.76% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -46.76% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -9.92% | -14.50% | +4.58% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.74% | -4.15% | -4.59% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.63% | 5.80% | -2.17% |
Volatility
FCOM vs. FDCF - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Fidelity MSCI Communication Services Index ETF (FCOM) is 6.37%, while Fidelity Disruptive Communications ETF (FDCF) has a volatility of 8.16%. This indicates that FCOM experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FDCF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| FCOM | FDCF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.37% | 8.16% | -1.79% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.59% | 14.44% | -2.85% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 20.29% | 23.03% | -2.74% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.21% | 20.77% | +0.44% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.94% | 20.77% | +0.17% |