PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FCFS vs. AGG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FCFS vs. AGG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in FirstCash, Inc. (FCFS) and iShares Core U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF (AGG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FCFS achieves a 40.82% return, which is significantly higher than AGG's 0.47% return. Over the past 10 years, FCFS has outperformed AGG with an annualized return of 17.90%, while AGG has yielded a comparatively lower 1.54% annualized return.


FCFS

1D
-2.35%
1M
-1.79%
YTD
40.82%
6M
38.34%
1Y
73.44%
3Y*
35.67%
5Y*
24.40%
10Y*
17.90%

AGG

1D
0.08%
1M
0.61%
YTD
0.47%
6M
0.55%
1Y
4.33%
3Y*
3.96%
5Y*
0.07%
10Y*
1.54%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FCFS vs. AGG - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FCFS
FirstCash, Inc.
40.82%55.68%-3.20%26.45%18.03%8.47%-11.74%12.72%8.48%45.56%
AGG
iShares Core U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF
0.47%7.19%1.31%5.65%-13.02%-1.77%7.48%8.46%0.09%3.55%

Correlation

The correlation between FCFS and AGG is 0.07, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.07

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.05

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.04

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

-0.02

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 26, 2003

-0.09

The correlation between FCFS and AGG shifts across timeframes, from -0.09 (all time) to 0.07 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FCFS vs. AGG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FCFS
FCFS Risk / Return Rank: 9292
Overall Rank
FCFS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9292
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FCFS Sortino Ratio Rank: 8888
Sortino Ratio Rank
FCFS Omega Ratio Rank: 9090
Omega Ratio Rank
FCFS Calmar Ratio Rank: 9494
Calmar Ratio Rank
FCFS Martin Ratio Rank: 9797
Martin Ratio Rank

AGG
AGG Risk / Return Rank: 3232
Overall Rank
AGG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3333
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AGG Sortino Ratio Rank: 3333
Sortino Ratio Rank
AGG Omega Ratio Rank: 3030
Omega Ratio Rank
AGG Calmar Ratio Rank: 3333
Calmar Ratio Rank
AGG Martin Ratio Rank: 3232
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FCFS vs. AGG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FirstCash, Inc. (FCFS) and iShares Core U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF (AGG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FCFSAGGDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.33

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.23

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.42

1.20

+0.21

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

5.79

1.57

+4.22

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

23.71

4.54

+19.17

FCFS vs. AGG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FCFS Sharpe Ratio is 2.47, which is higher than the AGG Sharpe Ratio of 1.14. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FCFS and AGG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FCFS vs. AGG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FCFS drawdown since its inception was -90.26%, which is greater than AGG's maximum drawdown of -18.43%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FCFS and AGG.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FCFSAGGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-90.26%

-18.43%

-71.83%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.75%

-2.76%

-9.99%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-23.38%

-6.11%

-17.27%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-35.70%

-17.82%

-17.88%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-50.16%

-18.43%

-31.73%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.90%

-1.93%

-1.97%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-24.22%

-2.71%

-21.51%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.11%

0.96%

+2.15%

Volatility

FCFS vs. AGG - Volatility Comparison

FirstCash, Inc. (FCFS) has a higher volatility of 13.14% compared to iShares Core U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF (AGG) at 1.10%. This indicates that FCFS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AGG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FCFSAGGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

13.14%

1.10%

+12.04%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

20.70%

2.83%

+17.87%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

29.84%

3.81%

+26.03%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

29.60%

6.10%

+23.50%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

30.62%

5.41%

+25.21%

Dividends

FCFS vs. AGG - Dividend Comparison

FCFS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.75%, less than AGG's 3.98% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
AGG
iShares Core U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF
3.98%3.89%3.74%3.13%2.39%1.77%2.14%2.70%2.72%2.32%2.39%2.45%
FCFS
FirstCash, Inc.
0.75%1.00%1.41%1.25%1.45%1.56%1.54%1.27%1.26%1.14%1.20%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


FCFS and AGG have a correlation of 0.07, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FCFS has higher volatility (13.14%) compared to AGG (1.10%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FCFS dropped -90.26% vs AGG's -18.43%.

FCFS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.47 vs 1.14), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FCFS and AGG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer