AGG vs. FBND
Compare and contrast key facts about iShares Core U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF (AGG) and Fidelity Total Bond ETF (FBND).
AGG and FBND are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. AGG is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the Barclays Capital U.S. Aggregate Bond Index. It was launched on Sep 22, 2003. FBND is an actively managed fund by Fidelity. It was launched on Oct 6, 2014.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: AGG or FBND.
Correlation
The correlation between AGG and FBND is 0.85, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Performance
AGG vs. FBND - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
AGG:
0.58
FBND:
0.80
AGG:
0.85
FBND:
1.15
AGG:
1.10
FBND:
1.14
AGG:
0.25
FBND:
0.42
AGG:
1.72
FBND:
2.69
AGG:
1.86%
FBND:
1.64%
AGG:
5.50%
FBND:
5.51%
AGG:
-18.43%
FBND:
-17.25%
AGG:
-8.27%
FBND:
-4.77%
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, AGG achieves a 2.05% return, which is significantly lower than FBND's 2.95% return. Over the past 10 years, AGG has underperformed FBND with an annualized return of 1.43%, while FBND has yielded a comparatively higher 2.34% annualized return.
AGG
2.05%
0.58%
1.88%
2.63%
-0.20%
1.43%
FBND
2.95%
0.63%
2.29%
3.73%
0.99%
2.34%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
AGG vs. FBND - Expense Ratio Comparison
AGG has a 0.05% expense ratio, which is lower than FBND's 0.36% expense ratio.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
AGG vs. FBND - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Core U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF (AGG) and Fidelity Total Bond ETF (FBND). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
AGG vs. FBND - Dividend Comparison
AGG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.38%, less than FBND's 4.55% yield.
TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
iShares Core U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF | 3.38% | 3.13% | 2.39% | 1.77% | 2.14% | 2.70% | 2.96% | 2.32% | 2.39% | 2.45% | 2.40% | 2.32% |
Fidelity Total Bond ETF | 4.55% | 4.26% | 3.07% | 1.86% | 4.25% | 2.90% | 2.93% | 2.56% | 2.84% | 3.26% | 0.66% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
AGG vs. FBND - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AGG drawdown since its inception was -18.43%, which is greater than FBND's maximum drawdown of -17.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AGG and FBND. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
AGG vs. FBND - Volatility Comparison
iShares Core U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF (AGG) and Fidelity Total Bond ETF (FBND) have volatilities of 1.36% and 1.35%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.