AGG vs. FBND
Compare and contrast key facts about iShares Core U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF (AGG) and Fidelity Total Bond ETF (FBND).
AGG and FBND are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. AGG is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the Bloomberg U.S. Aggregate Bond Index. It was launched on Sep 22, 2003. FBND is an actively managed fund by Fidelity. It was launched on Oct 6, 2014.
Performance
AGG vs. FBND - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
AGG vs. FBND - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AGG iShares Core U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF | 0.02% | 7.19% | 1.31% | 5.65% | -13.02% | -1.77% | 7.48% | 8.46% | 0.09% | 3.55% |
FBND Fidelity Total Bond ETF | 0.14% | 7.57% | 2.13% | 6.81% | -12.54% | -0.43% | 9.41% | 9.82% | -0.57% | 3.52% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, AGG achieves a 0.02% return, which is significantly lower than FBND's 0.14% return. Over the past 10 years, AGG has underperformed FBND with an annualized return of 1.66%, while FBND has yielded a comparatively higher 2.79% annualized return.
AGG
- 1D
- 0.23%
- 1M
- -1.79%
- YTD
- 0.02%
- 6M
- 0.97%
- 1Y
- 4.36%
- 3Y*
- 3.59%
- 5Y*
- 0.23%
- 10Y*
- 1.66%
FBND
- 1D
- 0.31%
- 1M
- -1.78%
- YTD
- 0.14%
- 6M
- 1.01%
- 1Y
- 4.73%
- 3Y*
- 4.42%
- 5Y*
- 1.01%
- 10Y*
- 2.79%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
AGG vs. FBND - Expense Ratio Comparison
AGG has a 0.03% expense ratio, which is lower than FBND's 0.36% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
AGG vs. FBND — Risk / Return Rank
AGG
FBND
AGG vs. FBND - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Core U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF (AGG) and Fidelity Total Bond ETF (FBND). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| AGG | FBND | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.00 | 1.07 | -0.07 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.42 | 1.50 | -0.08 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.18 | 1.19 | -0.01 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.81 | 1.82 | -0.01 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.07 | 5.71 | -0.64 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| AGG | FBND | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.00 | 1.07 | -0.07 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.04 | 0.17 | -0.13 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.31 | 0.46 | -0.15 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.59 | 0.44 | +0.15 |
Correlation
The correlation between AGG and FBND is 0.86, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
AGG vs. FBND - Dividend Comparison
AGG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.93%, less than FBND's 4.73% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AGG iShares Core U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF | 3.93% | 3.89% | 3.74% | 3.13% | 2.39% | 1.77% | 2.14% | 2.70% | 2.72% | 2.32% | 2.39% | 2.45% |
FBND Fidelity Total Bond ETF | 4.73% | 4.70% | 4.73% | 4.26% | 3.07% | 1.86% | 4.25% | 2.90% | 2.93% | 2.56% | 2.84% | 3.26% |
Drawdowns
AGG vs. FBND - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AGG drawdown since its inception was -18.43%, which is greater than FBND's maximum drawdown of -17.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AGG and FBND.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| AGG | FBND | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -18.43% | -17.25% | -1.18% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.52% | -2.79% | +0.27% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -17.82% | -17.25% | -0.57% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -18.43% | -17.25% | -1.18% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.36% | -1.78% | -0.58% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.71% | -3.38% | +0.67% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.90% | 0.89% | +0.01% |
Volatility
AGG vs. FBND - Volatility Comparison
iShares Core U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF (AGG) and Fidelity Total Bond ETF (FBND) have volatilities of 1.66% and 1.66%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| AGG | FBND | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.66% | 1.66% | 0.00% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.55% | 2.62% | -0.07% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.37% | 4.45% | -0.08% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 6.07% | 5.90% | +0.17% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 5.39% | 6.09% | -0.70% |