PortfoliosLab logo
AGG vs. BND
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between AGG and BND is -0.14. This indicates that the assets' prices tend to move in opposite directions. Negative correlation can be particularly beneficial for diversification and risk management, as one asset may offset the losses of the other during market fluctuations.


Performance

AGG vs. BND - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Core U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF (AGG) and Vanguard Total Bond Market ETF (BND). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

AGG:

0.88

BND:

0.88

Sortino Ratio

AGG:

1.16

BND:

1.16

Omega Ratio

AGG:

1.14

BND:

1.14

Calmar Ratio

AGG:

0.35

BND:

0.34

Martin Ratio

AGG:

1.99

BND:

2.01

Ulcer Index

AGG:

2.14%

BND:

2.11%

Daily Std Dev

AGG:

5.40%

BND:

5.33%

Max Drawdown

AGG:

-18.43%

BND:

-18.84%

Current Drawdown

AGG:

-7.43%

BND:

-7.83%

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with AGG having a 1.66% return and BND slightly higher at 1.68%. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with AGG having a 1.42% annualized return and BND not far behind at 1.40%.


AGG

YTD

1.66%

1M

-1.06%

6M

0.45%

1Y

4.57%

3Y*

1.18%

5Y*

-1.06%

10Y*

1.42%

BND

YTD

1.68%

1M

-1.03%

6M

0.43%

1Y

4.55%

3Y*

1.26%

5Y*

-1.10%

10Y*

1.40%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Vanguard Total Bond Market ETF

AGG vs. BND - Expense Ratio Comparison

AGG has a 0.05% expense ratio, which is higher than BND's 0.03% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Go deeper with the Portfolio Analysis tool — backtest performance, assess risk, compare to benchmarks, and more

Risk-Adjusted Performance

AGG vs. BND — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AGG
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of AGG is 6565
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of AGG is 7777
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of AGG is 7474
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of AGG is 6666
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of AGG is 4949
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of AGG is 6060
Martin Ratio Rank

BND
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of BND is 6565
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of BND is 7777
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of BND is 7474
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of BND is 6767
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of BND is 4848
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of BND is 6161
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

AGG vs. BND - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Core U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF (AGG) and Vanguard Total Bond Market ETF (BND). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current AGG Sharpe Ratio is 0.88, which is comparable to the BND Sharpe Ratio of 0.88. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AGG and BND, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading data...

Go to the full Sharpe Ratio tool to analyze any stock or portfolio. Customize time frames, set your own risk-free rate, and more

Dividends

AGG vs. BND - Dividend Comparison

AGG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.84%, more than BND's 3.77% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
AGG
iShares Core U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF
3.84%3.74%3.13%2.39%1.77%2.14%2.70%2.96%2.32%2.39%2.45%2.40%
BND
Vanguard Total Bond Market ETF
3.77%3.67%3.09%2.60%1.97%2.22%2.72%2.81%2.54%2.51%2.57%2.79%

Drawdowns

AGG vs. BND - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AGG drawdown since its inception was -18.43%, roughly equal to the maximum BND drawdown of -18.84%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AGG and BND.


Loading data...

Go to the full Drawdowns tool for more analysis options, including inflation-adjusted drawdowns, and more

Volatility

AGG vs. BND - Volatility Comparison

iShares Core U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF (AGG) and Vanguard Total Bond Market ETF (BND) have volatilities of 1.47% and 1.45%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading data...