FBL vs. PLTM
FBL (GraniteShares 2x Long META Daily ETF) and PLTM (GraniteShares Platinum Trust) are both exchange-traded funds - FBL is a Leveraged Equities fund actively managed by GraniteShares, while PLTM is a Precious Metals fund tracking the Platinum London PM Fix ($/ozt). FBL is actively managed, while PLTM is passively managed. Over the past 3 years, FBL returned 33.25%/yr vs 22.22%/yr for PLTM. At a 0.12 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. FBL charges 1.15%/yr vs 0.50%/yr for PLTM.
Performance
FBL vs. PLTM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FBL achieves a -19.72% return, which is significantly lower than PLTM's -9.33% return.
FBL
- 1D
- 8.48%
- 1M
- 2.55%
- YTD
- -19.72%
- 6M
- -15.34%
- 1Y
- -29.78%
- 3Y*
- 33.25%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
PLTM
- 1D
- -3.82%
- 1M
- -4.28%
- YTD
- -9.33%
- 6M
- 11.67%
- 1Y
- 71.85%
- 3Y*
- 22.22%
- 5Y*
- 9.22%
- 10Y*
- —
FBL vs. PLTM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FBL GraniteShares 2x Long META Daily ETF | -19.72% | 0.50% | 112.72% | 341.59% | -1.22% |
PLTM GraniteShares Platinum Trust | -9.33% | 124.46% | -8.91% | -8.10% | 3.70% |
Correlation
The correlation between FBL and PLTM is 0.11, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.11 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.11 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 14, 2022 | 0.12 |
FBL vs. PLTM - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
FBL
PLTM
Communication Services
-
Basic Materials
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
-
Financial Services
-
-
Healthcare
-
-
Industrials
-
-
Real Estate
-
Technology
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Communication Services
FBL
PLTM
-
Basic Materials
FBL
-
PLTM
-
Consumer Cyclical
FBL
-
PLTM
-
Consumer Defensive
FBL
-
PLTM
-
Energy
FBL
-
PLTM
-
Financial Services
FBL
-
PLTM
-
Healthcare
FBL
-
PLTM
-
Industrials
FBL
-
PLTM
-
Real Estate
FBL
-
PLTM
Technology
FBL
-
PLTM
-
Utilities
FBL
-
PLTM
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FBL vs. PLTM — Risk / Return Rank
FBL
PLTM
FBL vs. PLTM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GraniteShares 2x Long META Daily ETF (FBL) and GraniteShares Platinum Trust (PLTM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FBL | PLTM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.42 | 1.41 | -1.83 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.22 | 1.80 | -2.01 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.97 | 1.26 | -0.29 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.49 | 2.09 | -2.58 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.91 | 4.43 | -5.34 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FBL | PLTM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.42 | 1.41 | -1.83 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.28 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.12 | 0.24 | +0.88 |
Drawdowns
FBL vs. PLTM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FBL drawdown since its inception was -61.15%, which is greater than PLTM's maximum drawdown of -42.32%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FBL and PLTM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FBL | PLTM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -61.15% | -42.32% | -18.83% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -61.03% | -34.52% | -26.51% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -61.15% | -34.52% | -26.63% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -34.52% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -47.97% | -33.02% | -14.95% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -16.41% | -18.55% | +2.14% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 32.76% | 16.28% | +16.48% |
Volatility
FBL vs. PLTM - Volatility Comparison
GraniteShares 2x Long META Daily ETF (FBL) has a higher volatility of 17.63% compared to GraniteShares Platinum Trust (PLTM) at 10.88%. This indicates that FBL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PLTM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FBL | PLTM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 17.63% | 10.88% | +6.75% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 53.15% | 45.45% | +7.70% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 70.42% | 51.40% | +19.02% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 71.06% | 32.83% | +38.23% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 71.06% | 30.98% | +40.08% |
FBL vs. PLTM - Expense Ratio Comparison
FBL has a 1.15% expense ratio, which is higher than PLTM's 0.50% expense ratio.
Dividends
FBL vs. PLTM - Dividend Comparison
FBL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.58%, while PLTM has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
FBL GraniteShares 2x Long META Daily ETF | 2.58% | 2.07% | 0.00% | 51.58% |
PLTM GraniteShares Platinum Trust | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FBL and PLTM have a correlation of 0.11, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FBL has higher volatility (17.63%) compared to PLTM (10.88%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FBL dropped -61.15% vs PLTM's -42.32%.
On 3-year performance, FBL leads with 33.25% vs 22.22% for PLTM. On fees, PLTM is cheaper at 0.50% per year. On volatility, PLTM has been the lower-risk option at 10.88%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, FBL has performed better with a 33.25% return vs 22.22%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
PLTM is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 1.15% for FBL.
FBL has the higher dividend yield at 2.58%, compared with 0.00% for PLTM.
FBL is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while PLTM is Precious Metals. Their fees differ too: 1.15% for FBL and 0.50% for PLTM.
PLTM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.41 vs -0.42), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FBL and PLTM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer