PLTM vs. PLTR
PLTM (GraniteShares Platinum Trust) is Precious Metals fund tracking the Platinum London PM Fix ($/ozt), while PLTR (Palantir Technologies Inc.) is a stock. Over the past 5 years, PLTM returned 6.66%/yr vs 43.25%/yr for PLTR. At a 0.13 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
PLTM vs. PLTR - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PLTM achieves a -22.06% return, which is significantly higher than PLTR's -26.84% return.
PLTM
- 1D
- -1.56%
- 1M
- -6.47%
- 6M
- -31.69%
- YTD
- -22.06%
- 1Y
- 13.57%
- 3Y*
- 17.44%
- 5Y*
- 6.66%
- 10Y*
- —
PLTR
- 1D
- 2.56%
- 1M
- 1.60%
- 6M
- -27.52%
- YTD
- -26.84%
- 1Y
- -8.49%
- 3Y*
- 99.41%
- 5Y*
- 43.25%
- 10Y*
- —
PLTM vs. PLTR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PLTM GraniteShares Platinum Trust | -22.06% | 124.46% | -8.91% | -8.10% | 10.83% | -10.52% | 20.87% |
PLTR Palantir Technologies Inc. | -26.84% | 135.03% | 340.48% | 167.45% | -64.74% | -22.68% | 135.50% |
Correlation
The correlation between PLTM and PLTR is 0.19, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.19 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.14 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.16 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 30, 2020 | 0.13 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PLTM vs. PLTR — Risk / Return Rank
PLTM
PLTR
PLTM vs. PLTR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GraniteShares Platinum Trust (PLTM) and Palantir Technologies Inc. (PLTR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| PLTM | PLTR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.43 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.56 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.09 | 1.01 | +0.08 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.31 | -0.18 | +0.49 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.66 | -0.36 | +1.01 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
PLTM vs. PLTR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PLTM drawdown since its inception was -44.07%, smaller than the maximum PLTR drawdown of -84.62%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PLTM and PLTR.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PLTM | PLTR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -44.07% | -84.62% | +40.55% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -44.07% | -48.22% | +4.15% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -44.07% | -48.22% | +4.15% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -44.07% | -79.14% | +35.07% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -42.43% | -37.23% | -5.20% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -18.80% | -40.26% | +21.46% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 20.72% | 23.88% | -3.16% |
Volatility
PLTM vs. PLTR - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for GraniteShares Platinum Trust (PLTM) is 11.51%, while Palantir Technologies Inc. (PLTR) has a volatility of 16.54%. This indicates that PLTM experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PLTR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PLTM | PLTR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 11.51% | 16.54% | -5.03% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 40.48% | 39.51% | +0.97% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 50.98% | 51.70% | -0.72% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 33.14% | 65.65% | -32.51% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 31.14% | 69.61% | -38.47% |
Dividends
PLTM vs. PLTR - Dividend Comparison
Neither PLTM nor PLTR has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
PLTM and PLTR have a correlation of 0.19, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
PLTR has higher volatility (16.54%) compared to PLTM (11.51%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PLTM dropped -44.07% vs PLTR's -84.62%.
PLTM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.27 vs -0.17), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PLTM and PLTR
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer