PLTM vs. PLTR
PLTM (GraniteShares Platinum Trust) is Precious Metals fund tracking the Platinum London PM Fix ($/ozt), while PLTR (Palantir Technologies Inc.) is a stock. Over the past 5 years, PLTM returned 8.97%/yr vs 41.48%/yr for PLTR. Their 0.13 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship.
Performance
PLTM vs. PLTR - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PLTM achieves a -19.56% return, which is significantly higher than PLTR's -30.77% return.
PLTM
- 1D
- -0.13%
- 1M
- 2.06%
- 6M
- -22.81%
- YTD
- -19.56%
- 1Y
- 24.86%
- 3Y*
- 20.37%
- 5Y*
- 8.97%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 5.60%
PLTR
- 1D
- 0.65%
- 1M
- -4.83%
- 6M
- -16.05%
- YTD
- -30.77%
- 1Y
- -20.23%
- 3Y*
- 83.27%
- 5Y*
- 41.48%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 53.79%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $1.27M | $1.47M | $3.03M | |
| $3.87B | $4.57B | $5.46B |
PLTM vs. PLTR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PLTM GraniteShares Platinum Trust | -19.56% | 124.46% | -8.91% | -8.10% | 10.83% | -10.52% | 20.87% |
PLTR Palantir Technologies Inc. | -30.77% | 135.03% | 340.48% | 167.45% | -64.74% | -22.68% | 135.50% |
Correlation
The correlation between PLTM and PLTR is 0.21, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.21 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.14 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.16 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 30, 2020 | 0.13 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PLTM vs. PLTR — Risk / Return Rank
PLTM
PLTR
PLTM vs. PLTR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GraniteShares Platinum Trust (PLTM) and Palantir Technologies Inc. (PLTR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| PLTM | PLTR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.97 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.29 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.14 | 0.96 | +0.17 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.62 | -0.46 | +1.09 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.20 | -0.87 | +2.08 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
PLTM vs. PLTR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PLTM drawdown since its inception was -44.07%, smaller than the maximum PLTR drawdown of -84.62%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PLTM and PLTR.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PLTM | PLTR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -44.07% | -84.62% | +40.55% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -44.07% | -48.22% | +4.15% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -44.07% | -48.22% | +4.15% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -44.07% | -79.14% | +35.07% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -40.58% | -40.60% | +0.02% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -18.95% | -40.24% | +21.29% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 22.75% | 25.51% | -2.76% |
Volatility
PLTM vs. PLTR - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for GraniteShares Platinum Trust (PLTM) is 9.19%, while Palantir Technologies Inc. (PLTR) has a volatility of 13.63%. This indicates that PLTM experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PLTR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PLTM | PLTR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.19% | 13.63% | -4.44% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 38.75% | 40.52% | -1.77% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 50.54% | 52.38% | -1.84% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 33.15% | 65.74% | -32.59% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 31.14% | 69.46% | -38.32% |
Dividends
PLTM vs. PLTR - Dividend Comparison
Neither PLTM nor PLTR has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
PLTM and PLTR have a correlation of 0.21, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
PLTR has higher volatility (13.63%) compared to PLTM (9.19%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PLTM dropped -44.07% vs PLTR's -84.62%.
PLTM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.54 vs -0.43), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PLTM and PLTR
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer