PLTM vs. PLTR
PLTM (GraniteShares Platinum Trust) is Precious Metals fund tracking the Platinum London PM Fix ($/ozt), while PLTR (Palantir Technologies Inc.) is a stock. Over the past 5 years, PLTM returned 7.99%/yr vs 34.48%/yr for PLTR. At a 0.13 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
PLTM vs. PLTR - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PLTM achieves a -19.61% return, which is significantly higher than PLTR's -34.35% return.
PLTM
- 1D
- -1.49%
- 1M
- -14.13%
- YTD
- -19.61%
- 6M
- -27.97%
- 1Y
- 27.29%
- 3Y*
- 21.01%
- 5Y*
- 7.99%
- 10Y*
- —
PLTR
- 1D
- -2.34%
- 1M
- -14.74%
- YTD
- -34.35%
- 6M
- -39.89%
- 1Y
- -16.60%
- 3Y*
- 102.61%
- 5Y*
- 34.48%
- 10Y*
- —
PLTM vs. PLTR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PLTM GraniteShares Platinum Trust | -19.61% | 124.46% | -8.91% | -8.10% | 10.83% | -10.52% | 20.87% |
PLTR Palantir Technologies Inc. | -34.35% | 135.03% | 340.48% | 167.45% | -64.74% | -22.68% | 135.50% |
Correlation
The correlation between PLTM and PLTR is 0.19, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.19 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.15 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.16 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 30, 2020 | 0.13 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PLTM vs. PLTR — Risk / Return Rank
PLTM
PLTR
PLTM vs. PLTR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GraniteShares Platinum Trust (PLTM) and Palantir Technologies Inc. (PLTR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| PLTM | PLTR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.86 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.11 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.14 | 0.98 | +0.15 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.67 | -0.38 | +1.06 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.49 | -0.75 | +2.24 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
PLTM vs. PLTR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PLTM drawdown since its inception was -42.32%, smaller than the maximum PLTR drawdown of -84.62%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PLTM and PLTR.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PLTM | PLTR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -42.32% | -84.62% | +42.30% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -40.62% | -43.67% | +3.05% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -40.62% | -43.67% | +3.05% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -40.62% | -79.14% | +38.52% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -40.62% | -43.67% | +3.05% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -18.66% | -40.26% | +21.60% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 18.37% | 22.06% | -3.69% |
Volatility
PLTM vs. PLTR - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for GraniteShares Platinum Trust (PLTM) is 11.52%, while Palantir Technologies Inc. (PLTR) has a volatility of 19.16%. This indicates that PLTM experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PLTR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PLTM | PLTR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 11.52% | 19.16% | -7.64% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 46.02% | 38.60% | +7.42% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 51.35% | 51.49% | -0.14% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 32.99% | 65.59% | -32.60% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 31.10% | 69.73% | -38.63% |
Dividends
PLTM vs. PLTR - Dividend Comparison
Neither PLTM nor PLTR has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
PLTM and PLTR have a correlation of 0.19, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
PLTR has higher volatility (19.16%) compared to PLTM (11.52%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PLTM dropped -42.32% vs PLTR's -84.62%.
PLTM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.53 vs -0.32), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PLTM and PLTR
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer