PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PLTM vs. PLTR
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PLTM vs. PLTR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in GraniteShares Platinum Trust (PLTM) and Palantir Technologies Inc. (PLTR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PLTM achieves a -5.73% return, which is significantly higher than PLTR's -14.39% return.


PLTM

1D
0.59%
1M
-2.41%
YTD
-5.73%
6M
17.72%
1Y
80.23%
3Y*
23.81%
5Y*
10.16%
10Y*

PLTR

1D
-5.28%
1M
5.62%
YTD
-14.39%
6M
-10.85%
1Y
15.25%
3Y*
118.84%
5Y*
45.14%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PLTM vs. PLTR - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
PLTM
GraniteShares Platinum Trust
-5.73%124.46%-8.91%-8.10%10.83%-10.52%19.37%
PLTR
Palantir Technologies Inc.
-14.39%135.03%340.48%167.45%-64.74%-22.68%147.89%

Correlation

The correlation between PLTM and PLTR is 0.15, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.15

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.14

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.15

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 1, 2020

0.13

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PLTM vs. PLTR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PLTM
PLTM Risk / Return Rank: 4141
Overall Rank
PLTM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4545
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PLTM Sortino Ratio Rank: 3737
Sortino Ratio Rank
PLTM Omega Ratio Rank: 4343
Omega Ratio Rank
PLTM Calmar Ratio Rank: 4848
Calmar Ratio Rank
PLTM Martin Ratio Rank: 3333
Martin Ratio Rank

PLTR
PLTR Risk / Return Rank: 4848
Overall Rank
PLTR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5151
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PLTR Sortino Ratio Rank: 4747
Sortino Ratio Rank
PLTR Omega Ratio Rank: 4747
Omega Ratio Rank
PLTR Calmar Ratio Rank: 5050
Calmar Ratio Rank
PLTR Martin Ratio Rank: 4848
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PLTM vs. PLTR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GraniteShares Platinum Trust (PLTM) and Palantir Technologies Inc. (PLTR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


PLTMPLTRDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.57

0.30

+1.28

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.93

0.74

+1.19

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.28

1.09

+0.19

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.38

0.41

+1.98

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

5.09

0.76

+4.33

PLTM vs. PLTR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PLTM Sharpe Ratio is 1.57, which is higher than the PLTR Sharpe Ratio of 0.30. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PLTM and PLTR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


PLTMPLTRDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.57

0.30

+1.28

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.31

0.69

-0.38

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.25

0.91

-0.66

Drawdowns

PLTM vs. PLTR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PLTM drawdown since its inception was -42.32%, smaller than the maximum PLTR drawdown of -84.62%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PLTM and PLTR.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PLTMPLTRDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-42.32%

-84.62%

+42.30%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-34.52%

-38.19%

+3.67%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-34.52%

-40.61%

+6.09%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-34.52%

-79.14%

+44.62%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-30.36%

-26.55%

-3.81%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-18.54%

-40.31%

+21.77%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

16.14%

20.30%

-4.16%

Volatility

PLTM vs. PLTR - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for GraniteShares Platinum Trust (PLTM) is 10.35%, while Palantir Technologies Inc. (PLTR) has a volatility of 17.05%. This indicates that PLTM experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PLTR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PLTMPLTRDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

10.35%

17.05%

-6.70%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

45.30%

37.73%

+7.57%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

51.24%

51.27%

-0.03%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

32.80%

65.36%

-32.56%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

30.96%

69.82%

-38.86%

Dividends

PLTM vs. PLTR - Dividend Comparison

Neither PLTM nor PLTR has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


PLTM and PLTR have a correlation of 0.15, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PLTR has higher volatility (17.05%) compared to PLTM (10.35%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PLTM dropped -42.32% vs PLTR's -84.62%.

PLTM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.57 vs 0.30), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PLTM and PLTR

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer