PLTM vs. PLTR
PLTM (GraniteShares Platinum Trust) is Precious Metals fund tracking the Platinum London PM Fix ($/ozt), while PLTR (Palantir Technologies Inc.) is a stock. Over the past 5 years, PLTM returned 10.16%/yr vs 45.14%/yr for PLTR. At a 0.13 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
PLTM vs. PLTR - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PLTM achieves a -5.73% return, which is significantly higher than PLTR's -14.39% return.
PLTM
- 1D
- 0.59%
- 1M
- -2.41%
- YTD
- -5.73%
- 6M
- 17.72%
- 1Y
- 80.23%
- 3Y*
- 23.81%
- 5Y*
- 10.16%
- 10Y*
- —
PLTR
- 1D
- -5.28%
- 1M
- 5.62%
- YTD
- -14.39%
- 6M
- -10.85%
- 1Y
- 15.25%
- 3Y*
- 118.84%
- 5Y*
- 45.14%
- 10Y*
- —
PLTM vs. PLTR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PLTM GraniteShares Platinum Trust | -5.73% | 124.46% | -8.91% | -8.10% | 10.83% | -10.52% | 19.37% |
PLTR Palantir Technologies Inc. | -14.39% | 135.03% | 340.48% | 167.45% | -64.74% | -22.68% | 147.89% |
Correlation
The correlation between PLTM and PLTR is 0.15, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.15 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.14 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.15 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 1, 2020 | 0.13 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PLTM vs. PLTR — Risk / Return Rank
PLTM
PLTR
PLTM vs. PLTR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GraniteShares Platinum Trust (PLTM) and Palantir Technologies Inc. (PLTR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| PLTM | PLTR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.57 | 0.30 | +1.28 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.93 | 0.74 | +1.19 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.28 | 1.09 | +0.19 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.38 | 0.41 | +1.98 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.09 | 0.76 | +4.33 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| PLTM | PLTR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.57 | 0.30 | +1.28 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.31 | 0.69 | -0.38 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.25 | 0.91 | -0.66 |
Drawdowns
PLTM vs. PLTR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PLTM drawdown since its inception was -42.32%, smaller than the maximum PLTR drawdown of -84.62%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PLTM and PLTR.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PLTM | PLTR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -42.32% | -84.62% | +42.30% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -34.52% | -38.19% | +3.67% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -34.52% | -40.61% | +6.09% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -34.52% | -79.14% | +44.62% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -30.36% | -26.55% | -3.81% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -18.54% | -40.31% | +21.77% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 16.14% | 20.30% | -4.16% |
Volatility
PLTM vs. PLTR - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for GraniteShares Platinum Trust (PLTM) is 10.35%, while Palantir Technologies Inc. (PLTR) has a volatility of 17.05%. This indicates that PLTM experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PLTR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PLTM | PLTR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 10.35% | 17.05% | -6.70% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 45.30% | 37.73% | +7.57% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 51.24% | 51.27% | -0.03% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 32.80% | 65.36% | -32.56% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 30.96% | 69.82% | -38.86% |
Dividends
PLTM vs. PLTR - Dividend Comparison
Neither PLTM nor PLTR has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
PLTM and PLTR have a correlation of 0.15, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
PLTR has higher volatility (17.05%) compared to PLTM (10.35%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PLTM dropped -42.32% vs PLTR's -84.62%.
PLTM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.57 vs 0.30), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PLTM and PLTR
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer