PLTM vs. SPPP
Compare and contrast key facts about GraniteShares Platinum Trust (PLTM) and Sprott Physical Platinum and Palladium Trust (SPPP).
PLTM and SPPP are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. PLTM is a passively managed fund by GraniteShares that tracks the performance of the Platinum London PM Fix ($/ozt). It was launched on Jan 22, 2018. SPPP is an actively managed fund by Sprott. It was launched on Dec 19, 2012.
Performance
PLTM vs. SPPP - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
PLTM vs. SPPP - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PLTM GraniteShares Platinum Trust | -4.16% | 124.46% | -8.91% | -8.10% | 10.83% | -10.52% | 10.87% | 20.76% | -20.48% |
SPPP Sprott Physical Platinum and Palladium Trust | -7.78% | 89.43% | -11.89% | -25.86% | -2.37% | -21.77% | 23.84% | 46.00% | 7.84% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PLTM achieves a -4.16% return, which is significantly higher than SPPP's -7.78% return.
PLTM
- 1D
- 3.79%
- 1M
- -16.88%
- YTD
- -4.16%
- 6M
- 25.15%
- 1Y
- 95.35%
- 3Y*
- 24.98%
- 5Y*
- 9.65%
- 10Y*
- —
SPPP
- 1D
- 4.93%
- 1M
- -18.00%
- YTD
- -7.78%
- 6M
- 14.36%
- 1Y
- 56.24%
- 3Y*
- 8.35%
- 5Y*
- -4.20%
- 10Y*
- 9.27%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
PLTM vs. SPPP - Expense Ratio Comparison
PLTM has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is lower than SPPP's 1.02% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
PLTM vs. SPPP — Risk / Return Rank
PLTM
SPPP
PLTM vs. SPPP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GraniteShares Platinum Trust (PLTM) and Sprott Physical Platinum and Palladium Trust (SPPP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| PLTM | SPPP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.92 | 1.14 | +0.78 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.18 | 1.56 | +0.62 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.33 | 1.24 | +0.09 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.85 | 1.58 | +1.27 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.61 | 4.81 | +3.81 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| PLTM | SPPP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.92 | 1.14 | +0.78 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.30 | -0.12 | +0.42 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.28 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.27 | 0.11 | +0.15 |
Correlation
The correlation between PLTM and SPPP is 0.70, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
PLTM vs. SPPP - Dividend Comparison
Neither PLTM nor SPPP has paid dividends to shareholders.
Drawdowns
PLTM vs. SPPP - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PLTM drawdown since its inception was -42.32%, smaller than the maximum SPPP drawdown of -59.09%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PLTM and SPPP.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| PLTM | SPPP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -42.32% | -59.09% | +16.77% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -34.52% | -37.42% | +2.90% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -34.68% | -59.09% | +24.41% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -59.09% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -29.20% | -31.22% | +2.02% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -18.35% | -26.42% | +8.07% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 11.43% | 12.30% | -0.87% |
Volatility
PLTM vs. SPPP - Volatility Comparison
GraniteShares Platinum Trust (PLTM) and Sprott Physical Platinum and Palladium Trust (SPPP) have volatilities of 16.47% and 16.95%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| PLTM | SPPP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 16.47% | 16.95% | -0.48% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 45.52% | 46.40% | -0.88% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 49.91% | 49.39% | +0.52% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 32.39% | 34.38% | -1.99% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 30.82% | 32.88% | -2.06% |