PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
PLTM vs. PPLT
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between PLTM and PPLT is 0.96, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


-0.50.00.51.01.0

Performance

PLTM vs. PPLT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in GraniteShares Platinum Trust (PLTM) and Aberdeen Standard Physical Platinum Shares ETF (PPLT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

-12.00%-10.00%-8.00%-6.00%-4.00%-2.00%0.00%2.00%JulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember
-9.80%
-9.98%
PLTM
PPLT

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

PLTM:

-0.16

PPLT:

-0.16

Sortino Ratio

PLTM:

-0.07

PPLT:

-0.07

Omega Ratio

PLTM:

0.99

PPLT:

0.99

Calmar Ratio

PLTM:

-0.12

PPLT:

-0.07

Martin Ratio

PLTM:

-0.40

PPLT:

-0.39

Ulcer Index

PLTM:

9.97%

PPLT:

10.07%

Daily Std Dev

PLTM:

24.14%

PPLT:

24.20%

Max Drawdown

PLTM:

-42.32%

PPLT:

-70.73%

Current Drawdown

PLTM:

-28.92%

PPLT:

-55.09%

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with PLTM having a -7.05% return and PPLT slightly higher at -6.85%.


PLTM

YTD

-7.05%

1M

-3.50%

6M

-6.95%

1Y

-4.53%

5Y*

-0.12%

10Y*

N/A

PPLT

YTD

-6.85%

1M

-3.32%

6M

-6.76%

1Y

-4.66%

5Y*

-0.21%

10Y*

-3.06%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


PLTM vs. PPLT - Expense Ratio Comparison

PLTM has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is lower than PPLT's 0.60% expense ratio.


PPLT
Aberdeen Standard Physical Platinum Shares ETF
Expense ratio chart for PPLT: current value at 0.60% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.60%
Expense ratio chart for PLTM: current value at 0.50% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.50%

Risk-Adjusted Performance

PLTM vs. PPLT - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GraniteShares Platinum Trust (PLTM) and Aberdeen Standard Physical Platinum Shares ETF (PPLT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for PLTM, currently valued at -0.16, compared to the broader market0.002.004.00-0.16-0.16
The chart of Sortino ratio for PLTM, currently valued at -0.07, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.004.006.008.0010.00-0.07-0.07
The chart of Omega ratio for PLTM, currently valued at 0.99, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.002.503.000.990.99
The chart of Calmar ratio for PLTM, currently valued at -0.12, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.0015.00-0.12-0.12
The chart of Martin ratio for PLTM, currently valued at -0.40, compared to the broader market0.0020.0040.0060.0080.00100.00-0.40-0.39
PLTM
PPLT

The current PLTM Sharpe Ratio is -0.16, which is comparable to the PPLT Sharpe Ratio of -0.16. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PLTM and PPLT, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio-0.200.000.200.400.60JulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember
-0.16
-0.16
PLTM
PPLT

Dividends

PLTM vs. PPLT - Dividend Comparison

Neither PLTM nor PPLT has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Drawdowns

PLTM vs. PPLT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PLTM drawdown since its inception was -42.32%, smaller than the maximum PPLT drawdown of -70.73%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PLTM and PPLT. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-30.00%-28.00%-26.00%-24.00%-22.00%-20.00%JulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember
-28.92%
-28.90%
PLTM
PPLT

Volatility

PLTM vs. PPLT - Volatility Comparison

GraniteShares Platinum Trust (PLTM) and Aberdeen Standard Physical Platinum Shares ETF (PPLT) have volatilities of 5.14% and 5.21%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


5.00%5.50%6.00%6.50%7.00%7.50%8.00%8.50%JulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember
5.14%
5.21%
PLTM
PPLT
PortfoliosLab logo
Performance Analysis
Portfolio AnalysisPortfolio PerformanceStock ComparisonSharpe RatioMartin RatioTreynor RatioSortino RatioOmega RatioCalmar RatioSummers Ratio
Community
Discussions


Disclaimer

The information contained herein does not constitute investment advice and made available for educational purposes only. Prices and returns on equities are listed without consideration of fees, commissions, taxes, penalties, or interest payable due to purchasing, holding, or selling.

Copyright © 2024 PortfoliosLab