PortfoliosLab logo
PLTM vs. SIVR
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between PLTM and SIVR is 0.21, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


-0.50.00.51.0
Correlation: 0.2

Performance

PLTM vs. SIVR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in GraniteShares Platinum Trust (PLTM) and Aberdeen Standard Physical Silver Shares ETF (SIVR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

-20.00%0.00%20.00%40.00%60.00%80.00%100.00%NovemberDecember2025FebruaryMarchApril
-5.58%
96.81%
PLTM
SIVR

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

PLTM:

0.21

SIVR:

0.74

Sortino Ratio

PLTM:

0.45

SIVR:

1.19

Omega Ratio

PLTM:

1.05

SIVR:

1.15

Calmar Ratio

PLTM:

0.15

SIVR:

0.48

Martin Ratio

PLTM:

0.43

SIVR:

2.62

Ulcer Index

PLTM:

10.91%

SIVR:

8.75%

Daily Std Dev

PLTM:

22.58%

SIVR:

31.11%

Max Drawdown

PLTM:

-42.32%

SIVR:

-75.85%

Current Drawdown

PLTM:

-25.59%

SIVR:

-33.53%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PLTM achieves a 6.83% return, which is significantly lower than SIVR's 16.21% return.


PLTM

YTD

6.83%

1M

-0.74%

6M

-5.72%

1Y

6.58%

5Y*

4.42%

10Y*

N/A

SIVR

YTD

16.21%

1M

-0.12%

6M

-0.34%

1Y

22.95%

5Y*

16.84%

10Y*

7.15%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


PLTM vs. SIVR - Expense Ratio Comparison

PLTM has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than SIVR's 0.30% expense ratio.


Expense ratio chart for PLTM: current value is 0.50%, compared with the broader market range of 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%
PLTM: 0.50%
Expense ratio chart for SIVR: current value is 0.30%, compared with the broader market range of 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%
SIVR: 0.30%

Risk-Adjusted Performance

PLTM vs. SIVR — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PLTM
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of PLTM is 3636
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of PLTM is 3737
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of PLTM is 3939
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of PLTM is 3535
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of PLTM is 3737
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of PLTM is 3232
Martin Ratio Rank

SIVR
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of SIVR is 7070
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of SIVR is 7272
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of SIVR is 7474
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of SIVR is 7171
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of SIVR is 6262
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of SIVR is 7070
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

PLTM vs. SIVR - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GraniteShares Platinum Trust (PLTM) and Aberdeen Standard Physical Silver Shares ETF (SIVR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The chart of Sharpe ratio for PLTM, currently valued at 0.21, compared to the broader market-1.000.001.002.003.004.00
PLTM: 0.21
SIVR: 0.74
The chart of Sortino ratio for PLTM, currently valued at 0.45, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.004.006.008.00
PLTM: 0.45
SIVR: 1.19
The chart of Omega ratio for PLTM, currently valued at 1.05, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.002.50
PLTM: 1.05
SIVR: 1.15
The chart of Calmar ratio for PLTM, currently valued at 0.15, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.008.0010.0012.00
PLTM: 0.15
SIVR: 1.34
The chart of Martin ratio for PLTM, currently valued at 0.43, compared to the broader market0.0020.0040.0060.00
PLTM: 0.43
SIVR: 2.62

The current PLTM Sharpe Ratio is 0.21, which is lower than the SIVR Sharpe Ratio of 0.74. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PLTM and SIVR, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio-0.500.000.501.001.50NovemberDecember2025FebruaryMarchApril
0.21
0.74
PLTM
SIVR

Dividends

PLTM vs. SIVR - Dividend Comparison

Neither PLTM nor SIVR has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Drawdowns

PLTM vs. SIVR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PLTM drawdown since its inception was -42.32%, smaller than the maximum SIVR drawdown of -75.85%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PLTM and SIVR. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-35.00%-30.00%-25.00%-20.00%-15.00%-10.00%-5.00%0.00%NovemberDecember2025FebruaryMarchApril
-25.59%
-3.58%
PLTM
SIVR

Volatility

PLTM vs. SIVR - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for GraniteShares Platinum Trust (PLTM) is 5.89%, while Aberdeen Standard Physical Silver Shares ETF (SIVR) has a volatility of 11.50%. This indicates that PLTM experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SIVR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


4.00%6.00%8.00%10.00%12.00%NovemberDecember2025FebruaryMarchApril
5.89%
11.50%
PLTM
SIVR