PLTM vs. SIVR
Compare and contrast key facts about GraniteShares Platinum Trust (PLTM) and Aberdeen Standard Physical Silver Shares ETF (SIVR).
PLTM and SIVR are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. PLTM is a passively managed fund by GraniteShares that tracks the performance of the Platinum London PM Fix ($/ozt). It was launched on Jan 22, 2018. SIVR is a passively managed fund by Abrdn Plc that tracks the performance of the LBMA Silver Price ($/ozt). It was launched on Jul 24, 2009. Both PLTM and SIVR are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: PLTM or SIVR.
Key characteristics
| PLTM | SIVR | |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Return | -2.70% | 31.09% |
| 1Y Return | 11.85% | 37.94% |
| 3Y Return (Ann) | -3.39% | 8.40% |
| 5Y Return (Ann) | 1.28% | 12.91% |
| Sharpe Ratio | 0.44 | 1.22 |
| Sortino Ratio | 0.79 | 1.81 |
| Omega Ratio | 1.09 | 1.22 |
| Calmar Ratio | 0.31 | 0.68 |
| Martin Ratio | 1.21 | 5.19 |
| Ulcer Index | 8.88% | 7.38% |
| Daily Std Dev | 24.63% | 31.31% |
| Max Drawdown | -42.32% | -75.85% |
| Current Drawdown | -25.60% | -38.07% |
Correlation
The correlation between PLTM and SIVR is 0.58, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Performance
PLTM vs. SIVR - Performance Comparison
In the year-to-date period, PLTM achieves a -2.70% return, which is significantly lower than SIVR's 31.09% return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
PLTM vs. SIVR - Expense Ratio Comparison
PLTM has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than SIVR's 0.30% expense ratio.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
PLTM vs. SIVR - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GraniteShares Platinum Trust (PLTM) and Aberdeen Standard Physical Silver Shares ETF (SIVR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
PLTM vs. SIVR - Dividend Comparison
Neither PLTM nor SIVR has paid dividends to shareholders.
Drawdowns
PLTM vs. SIVR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PLTM drawdown since its inception was -42.32%, smaller than the maximum SIVR drawdown of -75.85%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PLTM and SIVR. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
PLTM vs. SIVR - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for GraniteShares Platinum Trust (PLTM) is 7.03%, while Aberdeen Standard Physical Silver Shares ETF (SIVR) has a volatility of 10.71%. This indicates that PLTM experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SIVR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.