PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PLTM vs. SIVR
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PLTM vs. SIVR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in GraniteShares Platinum Trust (PLTM) and abrdn Physical Silver Shares ETF (SIVR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PLTM achieves a -5.73% return, which is significantly lower than SIVR's 5.62% return.


PLTM

1D
0.59%
1M
-2.41%
YTD
-5.73%
6M
17.72%
1Y
80.23%
3Y*
23.81%
5Y*
10.16%
10Y*

SIVR

1D
0.48%
1M
-0.39%
YTD
5.62%
6M
28.07%
1Y
115.70%
3Y*
46.67%
5Y*
21.96%
10Y*
16.08%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PLTM vs. SIVR - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
PLTM
GraniteShares Platinum Trust
-5.73%124.46%-8.91%-8.10%10.83%-10.52%10.87%20.76%-20.48%
SIVR
abrdn Physical Silver Shares ETF
5.62%145.34%21.08%-0.91%2.59%-12.33%47.52%15.17%-7.62%

Correlation

The correlation between PLTM and SIVR is 0.69, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.69

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.65

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.63

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 6, 2018

0.60

The correlation between PLTM and SIVR has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.60 to 0.69 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PLTM vs. SIVR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PLTM
PLTM Risk / Return Rank: 4141
Overall Rank
PLTM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4545
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PLTM Sortino Ratio Rank: 3737
Sortino Ratio Rank
PLTM Omega Ratio Rank: 4343
Omega Ratio Rank
PLTM Calmar Ratio Rank: 4848
Calmar Ratio Rank
PLTM Martin Ratio Rank: 3333
Martin Ratio Rank

SIVR
SIVR Risk / Return Rank: 5252
Overall Rank
SIVR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5858
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SIVR Sortino Ratio Rank: 4242
Sortino Ratio Rank
SIVR Omega Ratio Rank: 5959
Omega Ratio Rank
SIVR Calmar Ratio Rank: 6060
Calmar Ratio Rank
SIVR Martin Ratio Rank: 4141
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PLTM vs. SIVR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GraniteShares Platinum Trust (PLTM) and abrdn Physical Silver Shares ETF (SIVR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


PLTMSIVRDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.57

1.98

-0.41

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.93

2.12

-0.19

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.28

1.36

-0.08

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.38

3.00

-0.62

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

5.09

6.52

-1.43

PLTM vs. SIVR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PLTM Sharpe Ratio is 1.57, which is comparable to the SIVR Sharpe Ratio of 1.98. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PLTM and SIVR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


PLTMSIVRDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.57

1.98

-0.41

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.31

0.61

-0.30

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.51

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.25

0.32

-0.07

Drawdowns

PLTM vs. SIVR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PLTM drawdown since its inception was -42.32%, smaller than the maximum SIVR drawdown of -75.85%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PLTM and SIVR.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PLTMSIVRDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-42.32%

-75.85%

+33.53%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-34.52%

-42.42%

+7.90%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-34.52%

-42.42%

+7.90%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-34.52%

-42.42%

+7.90%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-42.42%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-30.36%

-35.56%

+5.20%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-18.54%

-47.86%

+29.32%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

16.14%

19.50%

-3.36%

Volatility

PLTM vs. SIVR - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for GraniteShares Platinum Trust (PLTM) is 10.35%, while abrdn Physical Silver Shares ETF (SIVR) has a volatility of 16.44%. This indicates that PLTM experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SIVR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PLTMSIVRDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

10.35%

16.44%

-6.09%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

45.30%

58.28%

-12.98%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

51.24%

58.97%

-7.73%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

32.80%

36.17%

-3.37%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

30.96%

31.86%

-0.90%

PLTM vs. SIVR - Expense Ratio Comparison

PLTM has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than SIVR's 0.30% expense ratio.


Dividends

PLTM vs. SIVR - Dividend Comparison

Neither PLTM nor SIVR has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


PLTM and SIVR have a correlation of 0.69, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SIVR has higher volatility (16.44%) compared to PLTM (10.35%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PLTM dropped -42.32% vs SIVR's -75.85%.

On 5-year performance, SIVR leads with 21.96% vs 10.16% for PLTM. On fees, SIVR is cheaper at 0.30% per year. On volatility, PLTM has been the lower-risk option at 10.35%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, SIVR has performed better with a 21.96% return vs 10.16%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SIVR is cheaper with a 0.30% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for PLTM.

PLTM and SIVR have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

PLTM is categorized as Precious Metals, while SIVR is Silver. PLTM tracks Platinum London PM Fix ($/ozt), while SIVR tracks LBMA Silver Price ($/ozt). They also come from different issuers: GraniteShares and abrdn. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for PLTM and 0.30% for SIVR.

SIVR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.98 vs 1.57), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PLTM and SIVR

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer