FASGX vs. PALDX

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

FASGX (Fidelity Asset Manager 70% Fund) and PALDX (PGIM 60/40 Allocation Fund) are both Diversified Portfolio funds. Over the past 5 years, FASGX returned 8.47%/yr vs 9.57%/yr for PALDX. Their correlation of 0.92 suggests significant overlap in exposure. FASGX charges 0.67%/yr vs 0.03%/yr for PALDX.

Performance

FASGX vs. PALDX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Asset Manager 70% Fund (FASGX) and PGIM 60/40 Allocation Fund (PALDX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FASGX achieves a 11.93% return, which is significantly higher than PALDX's 7.89% return.

FASGX

• 1D: 0.51%
• 1M: 4.40%
• YTD: 11.93%
• 6M: 12.90%
• 1Y: 26.54%
• 3Y*: 16.47%
• 5Y*: 8.47%
• 10Y*: 10.01%

PALDX

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 3.48%
• YTD: 7.89%
• 6M: 8.39%
• 1Y: 20.92%
• 3Y*: 17.10%
• 5Y*: 9.57%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FASGX vs. PALDX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
FASGX Fidelity Asset Manager 70% Fund	11.93%	18.23%	10.81%	16.45%	-16.83%	13.98%	17.19%	22.81%	-7.65%	3.51%
PALDX PGIM 60/40 Allocation Fund	7.89%	13.62%	18.96%	18.90%	-15.65%	16.30%	10.68%	22.27%	-4.12%	5.95%

Correlation

The correlation between FASGX and PALDX is 0.94, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.94
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.92
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.94
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 14, 2017	0.92

The correlation between FASGX and PALDX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.92 to 0.94 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

FASGX vs. PALDX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FASGX

FASGX Risk / Return Rank: 77
FASGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 80
FASGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 76
FASGX Omega Ratio Rank: 74
FASGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 75
FASGX Martin Ratio Rank: 80

PALDX

PALDX Risk / Return Rank: 83
PALDX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 84
PALDX Sortino Ratio Rank: 83
PALDX Omega Ratio Rank: 79
PALDX Calmar Ratio Rank: 80
PALDX Martin Ratio Rank: 88

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FASGX vs. PALDX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Asset Manager 70% Fund (FASGX) and PGIM 60/40 Allocation Fund (PALDX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	FASGX	PALDX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.61	2.73	-0.13
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.64	3.92	-0.28
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.49	1.52	-0.03
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.39	3.62	-0.23
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	14.98	17.16	-2.18
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

FASGX vs. PALDX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FASGX Sharpe Ratio is 2.61, which is comparable to the PALDX Sharpe Ratio of 2.73. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FASGX and PALDX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	FASGX	PALDX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.61	2.73	-0.13
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.69	0.79	-0.10
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.79	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.63	0.81	-0.18

Drawdowns

FASGX vs. PALDX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FASGX drawdown since its inception was -47.35%, which is greater than PALDX's maximum drawdown of -26.16%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FASGX and PALDX.

Drawdown Indicators

	FASGX	PALDX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-47.35%	-26.16%	-21.19%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-7.95%	-5.96%	-1.99%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-12.80%	-16.06%	+3.26%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-23.54%	-20.47%	-3.07%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-27.20%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-6.71%	-4.09%	-2.62%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.79%	1.25%	+0.54%

Volatility

FASGX vs. PALDX - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Asset Manager 70% Fund (FASGX) has a higher volatility of 3.30% compared to PGIM 60/40 Allocation Fund (PALDX) at 2.30%. This indicates that FASGX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PALDX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FASGX	PALDX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.30%	2.30%	+1.00%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	8.39%	6.18%	+2.21%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	10.34%	7.89%	+2.45%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	12.27%	12.11%	+0.16%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	12.65%	12.69%	-0.04%

FASGX vs. PALDX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FASGX has a 0.67% expense ratio, which is higher than PALDX's 0.03% expense ratio.

Dividends

FASGX vs. PALDX - Dividend Comparison

FASGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.55%, more than PALDX's 5.02% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FASGX Fidelity Asset Manager 70% Fund	6.55%	7.33%	4.60%	1.72%	6.69%	2.73%	2.20%	5.19%	6.31%	2.75%	0.20%	5.58%
PALDX PGIM 60/40 Allocation Fund	5.02%	5.42%	10.40%	2.94%	6.19%	6.87%	2.58%	4.58%	3.65%	1.48%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FASGX and PALDX in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.94, FASGX and PALDX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, FASGX or PALDX?

FASGX has higher volatility (3.30%) compared to PALDX (2.30%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FASGX dropped -47.35% vs PALDX's -26.16%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

PALDX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.73 vs 2.61), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.