PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
FASGX vs. FBALX
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between FASGX and FBALX is 0.91, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


-0.50.00.51.00.9

Performance

FASGX vs. FBALX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Asset Manager 70% Fund (FASGX) and Fidelity Balanced Fund (FBALX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

-4.00%-2.00%0.00%2.00%4.00%6.00%8.00%AugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025
2.23%
2.67%
FASGX
FBALX

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

FASGX:

1.03

FBALX:

1.30

Sortino Ratio

FASGX:

1.40

FBALX:

1.79

Omega Ratio

FASGX:

1.19

FBALX:

1.24

Calmar Ratio

FASGX:

1.09

FBALX:

0.97

Martin Ratio

FASGX:

4.85

FBALX:

6.63

Ulcer Index

FASGX:

2.13%

FBALX:

1.85%

Daily Std Dev

FASGX:

10.02%

FBALX:

9.48%

Max Drawdown

FASGX:

-45.69%

FBALX:

-41.81%

Current Drawdown

FASGX:

-4.54%

FBALX:

-2.98%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FASGX achieves a 2.01% return, which is significantly higher than FBALX's 1.32% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with FASGX having a 5.13% annualized return and FBALX not far ahead at 5.28%.


FASGX

YTD

2.01%

1M

-1.50%

6M

2.23%

1Y

9.70%

5Y*

5.64%

10Y*

5.13%

FBALX

YTD

1.32%

1M

0.40%

6M

2.67%

1Y

11.78%

5Y*

5.14%

10Y*

5.28%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


FASGX vs. FBALX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FASGX has a 0.67% expense ratio, which is higher than FBALX's 0.51% expense ratio.


FASGX
Fidelity Asset Manager 70% Fund
Expense ratio chart for FASGX: current value at 0.67% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.67%
Expense ratio chart for FBALX: current value at 0.51% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.51%

Risk-Adjusted Performance

FASGX vs. FBALX — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FASGX
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of FASGX is 5353
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of FASGX is 4949
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of FASGX is 4747
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of FASGX is 4848
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of FASGX is 6666
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of FASGX is 5757
Martin Ratio Rank

FBALX
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of FBALX is 6363
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of FBALX is 6262
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of FBALX is 6161
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of FBALX is 6161
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of FBALX is 6262
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of FBALX is 6969
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

FASGX vs. FBALX - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Asset Manager 70% Fund (FASGX) and Fidelity Balanced Fund (FBALX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for FASGX, currently valued at 1.03, compared to the broader market-1.000.001.002.003.004.001.031.30
The chart of Sortino ratio for FASGX, currently valued at 1.40, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.001.401.79
The chart of Omega ratio for FASGX, currently valued at 1.19, compared to the broader market1.002.003.004.001.191.24
The chart of Calmar ratio for FASGX, currently valued at 1.09, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.0015.0020.001.090.97
The chart of Martin ratio for FASGX, currently valued at 4.85, compared to the broader market0.0020.0040.0060.0080.004.856.63
FASGX
FBALX

The current FASGX Sharpe Ratio is 1.03, which is comparable to the FBALX Sharpe Ratio of 1.30. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FASGX and FBALX, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio1.001.502.002.503.00AugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025
1.03
1.30
FASGX
FBALX

Dividends

FASGX vs. FBALX - Dividend Comparison

FASGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.86%, more than FBALX's 1.78% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
FASGX
Fidelity Asset Manager 70% Fund
1.86%1.89%1.72%2.15%1.35%0.98%1.53%1.61%1.16%1.31%1.68%10.98%
FBALX
Fidelity Balanced Fund
1.78%1.81%1.70%1.47%0.88%1.29%1.70%1.85%1.58%1.61%8.79%11.39%

Drawdowns

FASGX vs. FBALX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FASGX drawdown since its inception was -45.69%, which is greater than FBALX's maximum drawdown of -41.81%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FASGX and FBALX. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-8.00%-6.00%-4.00%-2.00%0.00%AugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025
-4.54%
-2.98%
FASGX
FBALX

Volatility

FASGX vs. FBALX - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Asset Manager 70% Fund (FASGX) has a higher volatility of 4.51% compared to Fidelity Balanced Fund (FBALX) at 3.26%. This indicates that FASGX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FBALX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


1.50%2.00%2.50%3.00%3.50%4.00%4.50%5.00%AugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025
4.51%
3.26%
FASGX
FBALX
PortfoliosLab logo
Performance Analysis
Portfolio AnalysisPortfolio PerformanceStock ComparisonSharpe RatioMartin RatioTreynor RatioSortino RatioOmega RatioCalmar RatioSummers Ratio
Community
Discussions


Disclaimer

The information contained herein does not constitute investment advice and made available for educational purposes only. Prices and returns on equities are listed without consideration of fees, commissions, taxes, penalties, or interest payable due to purchasing, holding, or selling.

Copyright © 2025 PortfoliosLab