PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FASGX vs. FXAIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FASGX vs. FXAIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Asset Manager 70% Fund (FASGX) and Fidelity 500 Index Fund (FXAIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FASGX achieves a 10.04% return, which is significantly higher than FXAIX's 8.59% return. Over the past 10 years, FASGX has underperformed FXAIX with an annualized return of 9.95%, while FXAIX has yielded a comparatively higher 15.44% annualized return.


FASGX

1D
2.16%
1M
0.12%
YTD
10.04%
6M
11.06%
1Y
22.60%
3Y*
15.52%
5Y*
7.80%
10Y*
9.95%

FXAIX

1D
1.76%
1M
-0.55%
YTD
8.59%
6M
8.94%
1Y
23.79%
3Y*
21.06%
5Y*
13.34%
10Y*
15.44%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FASGX vs. FXAIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FASGX
Fidelity Asset Manager 70% Fund
10.04%18.23%10.81%16.45%-16.83%13.98%17.19%22.81%-7.65%17.34%
FXAIX
Fidelity 500 Index Fund
8.59%17.84%25.01%26.29%-18.14%28.71%18.42%31.48%-4.43%21.82%

Correlation

The correlation between FASGX and FXAIX is 0.94, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.94

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.93

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.94

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.94

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 4, 2011

0.95

The correlation between FASGX and FXAIX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.93 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FASGX vs. FXAIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FASGX
FASGX Risk / Return Rank: 7878
Overall Rank
FASGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7777
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FASGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7575
Sortino Ratio Rank
FASGX Omega Ratio Rank: 7676
Omega Ratio Rank
FASGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7777
Calmar Ratio Rank
FASGX Martin Ratio Rank: 8383
Martin Ratio Rank

FXAIX
FXAIX Risk / Return Rank: 7373
Overall Rank
FXAIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7272
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FXAIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6868
Sortino Ratio Rank
FXAIX Omega Ratio Rank: 6969
Omega Ratio Rank
FXAIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7373
Calmar Ratio Rank
FXAIX Martin Ratio Rank: 8484
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FASGX vs. FXAIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Asset Manager 70% Fund (FASGX) and Fidelity 500 Index Fund (FXAIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FASGXFXAIXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.12

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.22

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.39

1.36

+0.04

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.90

2.74

+0.16

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.53

12.46

+0.07

FASGX vs. FXAIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FASGX Sharpe Ratio is 2.10, which is comparable to the FXAIX Sharpe Ratio of 1.97. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FASGX and FXAIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FASGX vs. FXAIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FASGX drawdown since its inception was -47.35%, which is greater than FXAIX's maximum drawdown of -33.79%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FASGX and FXAIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FASGXFXAIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-47.35%

-33.79%

-13.56%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.95%

-8.89%

+0.94%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-12.80%

-18.76%

+5.96%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-23.54%

-24.50%

+0.96%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-27.20%

-33.79%

+6.59%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.69%

-2.79%

+1.10%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.71%

-3.79%

-2.92%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.84%

1.95%

-0.11%

Volatility

FASGX vs. FXAIX - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Asset Manager 70% Fund (FASGX) has a higher volatility of 4.72% compared to Fidelity 500 Index Fund (FXAIX) at 4.44%. This indicates that FASGX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FXAIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FASGXFXAIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.72%

4.44%

+0.28%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.22%

9.70%

-0.48%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.01%

12.37%

-1.36%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

12.38%

16.99%

-4.61%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

12.69%

18.10%

-5.41%

FASGX vs. FXAIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FASGX has a 0.67% expense ratio, which is higher than FXAIX's 0.02% expense ratio.


Dividends

FASGX vs. FXAIX - Dividend Comparison

FASGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.67%, more than FXAIX's 1.06% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FASGX
Fidelity Asset Manager 70% Fund
6.67%7.33%4.60%1.72%6.69%2.73%2.20%5.19%6.31%2.75%0.20%5.58%
FXAIX
Fidelity 500 Index Fund
1.06%1.11%1.25%1.45%1.69%1.22%1.60%2.06%2.72%1.97%2.52%2.83%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.94, FASGX and FXAIX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

FASGX has higher volatility (4.72%) compared to FXAIX (4.44%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FASGX dropped -47.35% vs FXAIX's -33.79%.

FASGX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.10 vs 1.97), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FASGX and FXAIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer