PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
FASGX vs. FBGRX
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between FASGX and FBGRX is 0.90, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


-0.50.00.51.00.9

Performance

FASGX vs. FBGRX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Asset Manager 70% Fund (FASGX) and Fidelity Blue Chip Growth Fund (FBGRX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

1,000.00%1,500.00%2,000.00%2,500.00%3,000.00%JulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember
1,234.22%
3,343.06%
FASGX
FBGRX

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

FASGX:

1.42

FBGRX:

1.85

Sortino Ratio

FASGX:

1.96

FBGRX:

2.42

Omega Ratio

FASGX:

1.26

FBGRX:

1.34

Calmar Ratio

FASGX:

2.24

FBGRX:

2.46

Martin Ratio

FASGX:

8.64

FBGRX:

7.72

Ulcer Index

FASGX:

1.52%

FBGRX:

4.88%

Daily Std Dev

FASGX:

9.23%

FBGRX:

20.35%

Max Drawdown

FASGX:

-47.29%

FBGRX:

-57.42%

Current Drawdown

FASGX:

-2.52%

FBGRX:

-0.26%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FASGX achieves a 12.42% return, which is significantly lower than FBGRX's 37.53% return. Over the past 10 years, FASGX has underperformed FBGRX with an annualized return of 7.14%, while FBGRX has yielded a comparatively higher 13.85% annualized return.


FASGX

YTD

12.42%

1M

-0.38%

6M

4.93%

1Y

13.12%

5Y*

7.78%

10Y*

7.14%

FBGRX

YTD

37.53%

1M

6.49%

6M

8.47%

1Y

37.72%

5Y*

17.04%

10Y*

13.85%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


FASGX vs. FBGRX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FASGX has a 0.67% expense ratio, which is lower than FBGRX's 0.79% expense ratio.


FBGRX
Fidelity Blue Chip Growth Fund
Expense ratio chart for FBGRX: current value at 0.79% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.79%
Expense ratio chart for FASGX: current value at 0.67% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.67%

Risk-Adjusted Performance

FASGX vs. FBGRX - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Asset Manager 70% Fund (FASGX) and Fidelity Blue Chip Growth Fund (FBGRX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for FASGX, currently valued at 1.42, compared to the broader market-1.000.001.002.003.004.001.421.85
The chart of Sortino ratio for FASGX, currently valued at 1.96, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.004.006.008.0010.001.962.42
The chart of Omega ratio for FASGX, currently valued at 1.26, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.002.503.003.501.261.34
The chart of Calmar ratio for FASGX, currently valued at 2.24, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.008.0010.0012.0014.002.242.46
The chart of Martin ratio for FASGX, currently valued at 8.64, compared to the broader market0.0020.0040.0060.008.647.72
FASGX
FBGRX

The current FASGX Sharpe Ratio is 1.42, which is comparable to the FBGRX Sharpe Ratio of 1.85. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FASGX and FBGRX, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio1.001.502.002.503.00JulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember
1.42
1.85
FASGX
FBGRX

Dividends

FASGX vs. FBGRX - Dividend Comparison

FASGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.53%, more than FBGRX's 1.03% yield.


TTM20232022202120202019201820172016201520142013
FASGX
Fidelity Asset Manager 70% Fund
1.53%1.72%2.15%1.35%0.98%1.53%1.61%1.16%1.31%1.68%10.98%2.55%
FBGRX
Fidelity Blue Chip Growth Fund
1.03%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.12%0.09%0.22%5.07%6.08%7.80%

Drawdowns

FASGX vs. FBGRX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FASGX drawdown since its inception was -47.29%, smaller than the maximum FBGRX drawdown of -57.42%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FASGX and FBGRX. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-15.00%-10.00%-5.00%0.00%JulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember
-2.52%
-0.26%
FASGX
FBGRX

Volatility

FASGX vs. FBGRX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Fidelity Asset Manager 70% Fund (FASGX) is 2.86%, while Fidelity Blue Chip Growth Fund (FBGRX) has a volatility of 5.58%. This indicates that FASGX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FBGRX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


2.00%4.00%6.00%8.00%10.00%JulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember
2.86%
5.58%
FASGX
FBGRX
PortfoliosLab logo
Performance Analysis
Portfolio AnalysisPortfolio PerformanceStock ComparisonSharpe RatioMartin RatioTreynor RatioSortino RatioOmega RatioCalmar RatioSummers Ratio
Community
Discussions


Disclaimer

The information contained herein does not constitute investment advice and made available for educational purposes only. Prices and returns on equities are listed without consideration of fees, commissions, taxes, penalties, or interest payable due to purchasing, holding, or selling.

Copyright © 2024 PortfoliosLab