FAB vs. IMCV

Last updated Jun 3, 2026

FAB (First Trust Multi Cap Value AlphaDEX Fund) and IMCV (iShares Morningstar Mid-Cap ETF) are both Mid Cap Value Equities funds - FAB tracks the NASDAQ AlphaDEX Multi Cap Value Index while IMCV tracks the Morningstar US Mid Cap Broad Value Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, FAB returned 10.48%/yr vs 10.42%/yr for IMCV. Their correlation of 0.88 suggests significant overlap in exposure. FAB charges 0.64%/yr vs 0.06%/yr for IMCV.

Performance

FAB vs. IMCV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in First Trust Multi Cap Value AlphaDEX Fund (FAB) and iShares Morningstar Mid-Cap ETF (IMCV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FAB achieves a 11.59% return, which is significantly higher than IMCV's 10.19% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with FAB having a 10.48% annualized return and IMCV not far behind at 10.42%.

FAB

• 1D: 0.47%
• 1M: 0.35%
• YTD: 11.59%
• 6M: 13.25%
• 1Y: 28.98%
• 3Y*: 15.50%
• 5Y*: 8.03%
• 10Y*: 10.48%

IMCV

• 1D: 0.54%
• 1M: 1.44%
• YTD: 10.19%
• 6M: 12.46%
• 1Y: 24.37%
• 3Y*: 16.74%
• 5Y*: 8.82%
• 10Y*: 10.42%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FAB vs. IMCV - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
FAB First Trust Multi Cap Value AlphaDEX Fund	11.59%	9.86%	7.82%	15.81%	-6.79%	30.83%	2.40%	23.73%	-14.62%	14.62%
IMCV iShares Morningstar Mid-Cap ETF	10.19%	13.52%	12.28%	11.89%	-6.98%	33.56%	-4.11%	24.72%	-10.93%	12.60%

Correlation

The correlation between FAB and IMCV is 0.94, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.94
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.94
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.96
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.94
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 24, 2007	0.88

The correlation between FAB and IMCV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.88 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.

FAB vs. IMCV - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	FAB	IMCV
Financial Services	23.9%	15.6%
Consumer Cyclical	13.9%	8.7%
Industrials	12.0%	12.1%
Energy	8.3%	12.5%
Technology	7.9%	9.1%
Real Estate	7.7%	5.6%
Healthcare	7.1%	8.5%
Utilities	6.2%	10.0%
Consumer Defensive	5.9%	8.9%
Basic Materials	3.9%	6.5%
Communication Services	2.7%	2.5%

Return for Risk

FAB vs. IMCV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FAB

FAB Risk / Return Rank: 69
FAB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 62
FAB Sortino Ratio Rank: 69
FAB Omega Ratio Rank: 60
FAB Calmar Ratio Rank: 81
FAB Martin Ratio Rank: 71

IMCV

IMCV Risk / Return Rank: 65
IMCV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 62
IMCV Sortino Ratio Rank: 65
IMCV Omega Ratio Rank: 60
IMCV Calmar Ratio Rank: 70
IMCV Martin Ratio Rank: 70

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FAB vs. IMCV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Multi Cap Value AlphaDEX Fund (FAB) and iShares Morningstar Mid-Cap ETF (IMCV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	FAB	IMCV	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	2.11	2.11	+0.01
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	3.21	3.04	+0.16
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.37	1.37	0.00
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	4.31	3.56	+0.75
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	13.42	13.32	+0.10
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

FAB vs. IMCV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FAB Sharpe Ratio is 2.11, which is comparable to the IMCV Sharpe Ratio of 2.11. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FAB and IMCV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	FAB	IMCV	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.11	2.11	+0.01
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.43	0.53	-0.10
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.48	0.53	-0.06
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.34	0.47	-0.13

Drawdowns

FAB vs. IMCV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FAB drawdown since its inception was -63.29%, roughly equal to the maximum IMCV drawdown of -64.74%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FAB and IMCV.

Drawdown Indicators

	FAB	IMCV	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-63.29%	-64.74%	+1.45%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-6.65%	-6.90%	+0.25%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-22.91%	-18.63%	-4.28%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-22.91%	-19.87%	-3.04%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-47.08%	-46.33%	-0.75%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.20%	0.00%	-0.20%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-9.26%	-8.42%	-0.84%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.14%	1.85%	+0.29%

Volatility

FAB vs. IMCV - Volatility Comparison

First Trust Multi Cap Value AlphaDEX Fund (FAB) has a higher volatility of 3.29% compared to iShares Morningstar Mid-Cap ETF (IMCV) at 2.73%. This indicates that FAB's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IMCV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FAB	IMCV	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.29%	2.73%	+0.56%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	8.60%	8.02%	+0.58%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	13.79%	11.63%	+2.16%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	18.71%	16.63%	+2.08%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	22.06%	19.66%	+2.40%

FAB vs. IMCV - Expense Ratio Comparison

FAB has a 0.64% expense ratio, which is higher than IMCV's 0.06% expense ratio.

Dividends

FAB vs. IMCV - Dividend Comparison

FAB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.58%, less than IMCV's 1.94% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FAB First Trust Multi Cap Value AlphaDEX Fund	1.58%	1.57%	2.00%	1.94%	1.80%	1.32%	1.59%	1.75%	1.96%	1.42%	1.40%	1.62%
IMCV iShares Morningstar Mid-Cap ETF	1.94%	2.23%	2.36%	2.30%	2.36%	1.86%	2.61%	2.45%	2.61%	1.87%	2.09%	2.29%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FAB and IMCV in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.94, FAB and IMCV move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, FAB or IMCV?

FAB has higher volatility (3.29%) compared to IMCV (2.73%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FAB dropped -63.29% vs IMCV's -64.74%.

Which ETF is better, FAB or IMCV?

On 10-year performance, FAB leads with 10.48% vs 10.42% for IMCV. On fees, IMCV is cheaper at 0.06% per year. On volatility, IMCV has been the lower-risk option at 2.73%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, FAB or IMCV?

Over the 10-year period, FAB has performed better with a 10.48% return vs 10.42%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, FAB or IMCV?

IMCV is cheaper with a 0.06% expense ratio, compared with 0.64% for FAB.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, FAB or IMCV?

IMCV has the higher dividend yield at 1.94%, compared with 1.58% for FAB.

What is the main difference between FAB and IMCV?

FAB tracks NASDAQ AlphaDEX Multi Cap Value Index, while IMCV tracks Morningstar US Mid Cap Broad Value Index. They also come from different issuers: First Trust and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.64% for FAB and 0.06% for IMCV.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FAB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.11 vs 2.11), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.