PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
FAB vs. FNCMX
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between FAB and FNCMX is 0.67, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


-0.50.00.51.00.7

Performance

FAB vs. FNCMX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in First Trust Multi Cap Value AlphaDEX Fund (FAB) and Fidelity NASDAQ Composite Index Fund (FNCMX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

-5.00%0.00%5.00%10.00%SeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025February
-0.82%
9.49%
FAB
FNCMX

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

FAB:

0.64

FNCMX:

1.39

Sortino Ratio

FAB:

1.03

FNCMX:

1.88

Omega Ratio

FAB:

1.12

FNCMX:

1.25

Calmar Ratio

FAB:

0.98

FNCMX:

1.96

Martin Ratio

FAB:

2.32

FNCMX:

7.02

Ulcer Index

FAB:

4.04%

FNCMX:

3.66%

Daily Std Dev

FAB:

14.70%

FNCMX:

18.53%

Max Drawdown

FAB:

-63.29%

FNCMX:

-55.71%

Current Drawdown

FAB:

-7.96%

FNCMX:

-3.15%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FAB achieves a -0.06% return, which is significantly lower than FNCMX's 1.18% return. Over the past 10 years, FAB has underperformed FNCMX with an annualized return of 7.32%, while FNCMX has yielded a comparatively higher 15.14% annualized return.


FAB

YTD

-0.06%

1M

-3.05%

6M

-0.82%

1Y

8.57%

5Y*

9.94%

10Y*

7.32%

FNCMX

YTD

1.18%

1M

-2.37%

6M

9.49%

1Y

22.47%

5Y*

16.34%

10Y*

15.14%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


FAB vs. FNCMX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FAB has a 0.70% expense ratio, which is higher than FNCMX's 0.29% expense ratio.


FAB
First Trust Multi Cap Value AlphaDEX Fund
Expense ratio chart for FAB: current value at 0.70% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.70%
Expense ratio chart for FNCMX: current value at 0.29% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.29%

Risk-Adjusted Performance

FAB vs. FNCMX — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FAB
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of FAB is 2727
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of FAB is 2323
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of FAB is 2424
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of FAB is 2323
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of FAB is 4141
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of FAB is 2626
Martin Ratio Rank

FNCMX
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of FNCMX is 7474
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of FNCMX is 7171
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of FNCMX is 7070
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of FNCMX is 7070
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of FNCMX is 8383
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of FNCMX is 7777
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

FAB vs. FNCMX - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Multi Cap Value AlphaDEX Fund (FAB) and Fidelity NASDAQ Composite Index Fund (FNCMX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for FAB, currently valued at 0.64, compared to the broader market0.002.004.000.641.39
The chart of Sortino ratio for FAB, currently valued at 1.03, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.001.031.88
The chart of Omega ratio for FAB, currently valued at 1.12, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.002.503.001.121.25
The chart of Calmar ratio for FAB, currently valued at 0.98, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.0015.000.981.96
The chart of Martin ratio for FAB, currently valued at 2.32, compared to the broader market0.0020.0040.0060.0080.00100.002.327.02
FAB
FNCMX

The current FAB Sharpe Ratio is 0.64, which is lower than the FNCMX Sharpe Ratio of 1.39. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FAB and FNCMX, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio0.501.001.502.002.503.00SeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025February
0.64
1.39
FAB
FNCMX

Dividends

FAB vs. FNCMX - Dividend Comparison

FAB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.00%, more than FNCMX's 0.60% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
FAB
First Trust Multi Cap Value AlphaDEX Fund
2.00%2.00%1.94%1.80%1.32%1.59%1.75%1.96%1.42%1.40%1.62%1.39%
FNCMX
Fidelity NASDAQ Composite Index Fund
0.60%0.61%0.67%0.88%0.47%0.67%0.97%0.94%0.70%0.91%0.89%0.80%

Drawdowns

FAB vs. FNCMX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FAB drawdown since its inception was -63.29%, which is greater than FNCMX's maximum drawdown of -55.71%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FAB and FNCMX. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-10.00%-8.00%-6.00%-4.00%-2.00%0.00%SeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025February
-7.96%
-3.15%
FAB
FNCMX

Volatility

FAB vs. FNCMX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for First Trust Multi Cap Value AlphaDEX Fund (FAB) is 3.62%, while Fidelity NASDAQ Composite Index Fund (FNCMX) has a volatility of 5.44%. This indicates that FAB experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FNCMX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


3.00%4.00%5.00%6.00%7.00%8.00%SeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025February
3.62%
5.44%
FAB
FNCMX
PortfoliosLab logo
Performance Analysis
Portfolio AnalysisPortfolio PerformanceStock ComparisonSharpe RatioMartin RatioTreynor RatioSortino RatioOmega RatioCalmar RatioSummers Ratio
Community
Discussions


Disclaimer

The information contained herein does not constitute investment advice and made available for educational purposes only. Prices and returns on equities are listed without consideration of fees, commissions, taxes, penalties, or interest payable due to purchasing, holding, or selling.

Copyright © 2025 PortfoliosLab