FAB vs. CVAR

Last updated Jun 23, 2026

FAB (First Trust Multi Cap Value AlphaDEX Fund) and CVAR (Cultivar ETF) are both Mid Cap Value Equities funds. FAB is passively managed, while CVAR is actively managed. Over the past 3 years, FAB returned 15.38%/yr vs 7.92%/yr for CVAR. Their correlation of 0.88 suggests significant overlap in exposure. FAB charges 0.64%/yr vs 0.87%/yr for CVAR.

Performance

FAB vs. CVAR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in First Trust Multi Cap Value AlphaDEX Fund (FAB) and Cultivar ETF (CVAR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FAB achieves a 11.98% return, which is significantly higher than CVAR's -1.03% return.

FAB

• 1D: 0.12%
• 1M: 1.28%
• YTD: 11.98%
• 6M: 10.85%
• 1Y: 26.31%
• 3Y*: 15.38%
• 5Y*: 9.02%
• 10Y*: 11.00%

CVAR

• 1D: -0.55%
• 1M: -2.06%
• YTD: -1.03%
• 6M: -1.81%
• 1Y: 9.67%
• 3Y*: 7.92%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FAB vs. CVAR - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
FAB First Trust Multi Cap Value AlphaDEX Fund	11.98%	9.86%	7.82%	15.81%	-6.79%	2.75%
CVAR Cultivar ETF	-1.03%	14.95%	3.12%	11.74%	-5.03%	0.70%

Correlation

The correlation between FAB and CVAR is 0.81, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.81
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.86
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 23, 2021	0.88

The correlation between FAB and CVAR has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.81 to 0.88 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

FAB vs. CVAR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FAB

FAB Risk / Return Rank: 65
FAB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 59
FAB Sortino Ratio Rank: 65
FAB Omega Ratio Rank: 56
FAB Calmar Ratio Rank: 79
FAB Martin Ratio Rank: 68

CVAR

CVAR Risk / Return Rank: 23
CVAR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 24
CVAR Sortino Ratio Rank: 23
CVAR Omega Ratio Rank: 22
CVAR Calmar Ratio Rank: 24
CVAR Martin Ratio Rank: 22

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FAB vs. CVAR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Multi Cap Value AlphaDEX Fund (FAB) and Cultivar ETF (CVAR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	FAB	CVAR	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.92	0.83	+1.08
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.91	1.26	+1.65
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.34	1.15	+0.19
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.97	1.15	+2.82
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	12.31	2.60	+9.70

FAB vs. CVAR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FAB Sharpe Ratio is 1.92, which is higher than the CVAR Sharpe Ratio of 0.83. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FAB and CVAR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

FAB vs. CVAR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FAB drawdown since its inception was -63.29%, which is greater than CVAR's maximum drawdown of -19.39%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FAB and CVAR.

Drawdown Indicators

	FAB	CVAR	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-63.29%	-19.39%	-43.90%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-6.65%	-8.45%	+1.80%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-22.91%	-15.58%	-7.33%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-22.91%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-47.08%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.06%	-7.76%	+5.70%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-9.23%	-5.51%	-3.72%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.14%	3.72%	-1.58%

Volatility

FAB vs. CVAR - Volatility Comparison

First Trust Multi Cap Value AlphaDEX Fund (FAB) and Cultivar ETF (CVAR) have volatilities of 3.25% and 3.41%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FAB	CVAR	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.25%	3.41%	-0.16%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	8.68%	7.76%	+0.92%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	13.83%	11.68%	+2.15%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	18.67%	15.44%	+3.23%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	22.06%	15.44%	+6.62%

FAB vs. CVAR - Expense Ratio Comparison

FAB has a 0.64% expense ratio, which is lower than CVAR's 0.87% expense ratio.

Dividends

FAB vs. CVAR - Dividend Comparison

FAB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.57%, more than CVAR's 1.54% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
CVAR Cultivar ETF	1.54%	1.53%	3.57%	1.41%	5.52%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
FAB First Trust Multi Cap Value AlphaDEX Fund	1.57%	1.57%	2.00%	1.94%	1.80%	1.32%	1.59%	1.75%	1.96%	1.42%	1.40%	1.62%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FAB and CVAR in my portfolio?

FAB and CVAR have a correlation of 0.81, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, FAB or CVAR?

CVAR has higher volatility (3.41%) compared to FAB (3.25%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FAB dropped -63.29% vs CVAR's -19.39%.

Which ETF is better, FAB or CVAR?

On 3-year performance, FAB leads with 15.38% vs 7.92% for CVAR. On fees, FAB is cheaper at 0.64% per year. On volatility, FAB has been the lower-risk option at 3.25%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, FAB or CVAR?

Over the 3-year period, FAB has performed better with a 15.38% return vs 7.92%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, FAB or CVAR?

FAB is cheaper with a 0.64% expense ratio, compared with 0.87% for CVAR.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, FAB or CVAR?

FAB has the higher dividend yield at 1.57%, compared with 1.54% for CVAR.

What is the main difference between FAB and CVAR?

They also come from different issuers: First Trust and Cultivar. Their fees differ too: 0.64% for FAB and 0.87% for CVAR.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FAB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.92 vs 0.83), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.