EXE vs. ET

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Expand Energy Corp (EXE) and Energy Transfer LP (ET).

Performance

EXE vs. ET - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Expand Energy Corp (EXE) and Energy Transfer LP (ET). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

EXE vs. ET - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
EXE Expand Energy Corp	0.02%	14.35%	33.18%	-14.77%	62.34%	46.39%
ET Energy Transfer LP	19.24%	-9.37%	53.87%	27.87%	55.74%	26.43%

Fundamentals

Market Cap EXE : $26.38M ET : $70.45B
EPS EXE : $11.34 ET : $1.37
PE Ratio EXE : 9.68 ET : 14.10
PS Ratio EXE : 1.45 ET : 0.84
PB Ratio EXE : 0.00 ET : 1.44
Total Revenue (TTM) EXE : $12.12B ET : $82.63B
Gross Profit (TTM) EXE : $9.75B ET : $18.01B
EBITDA (TTM) EXE : $5.38B ET : $14.93B

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EXE achieves a 0.02% return, which is significantly lower than ET's 19.24% return.

EXE

• 1D: -1.50%
• 1M: 2.28%
• YTD: 0.02%
• 6M: 4.40%
• 1Y: 1.69%
• 3Y*: 16.63%
• 5Y*: 25.31%
• 10Y*: —

ET

• 1D: -1.48%
• 1M: 2.44%
• YTD: 19.24%
• 6M: 16.88%
• 1Y: 12.07%
• 3Y*: 25.52%
• 5Y*: 29.51%
• 10Y*: 20.51%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

EXE vs. ET — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EXE

EXE Risk / Return Rank: 41
EXE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 44
EXE Sortino Ratio Rank: 37
EXE Omega Ratio Rank: 37
EXE Calmar Ratio Rank: 44
EXE Martin Ratio Rank: 44

ET

ET Risk / Return Rank: 57
ET Sharpe Ratio Rank: 61
ET Sortino Ratio Rank: 52
ET Omega Ratio Rank: 54
ET Calmar Ratio Rank: 58
ET Martin Ratio Rank: 61

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EXE vs. ET - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Expand Energy Corp (EXE) and Energy Transfer LP (ET). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	EXE	ET	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	0.05	0.51	-0.46
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	0.30	0.86	-0.55
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.04	1.12	-0.08
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.09	0.65	-0.57
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	0.16	1.82	-1.66
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

EXE vs. ET - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EXE Sharpe Ratio is 0.05, which is lower than the ET Sharpe Ratio of 0.51. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EXE and ET, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	EXE	ET	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.05	0.51	-0.46
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.73	1.17	-0.44
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.56	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.70	0.36	+0.35

Correlation

The correlation between EXE and ET is 0.49, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Dividends

EXE vs. ET - Dividend Comparison

EXE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.91%, less than ET's 6.87% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
EXE Expand Energy Corp	2.91%	2.89%	2.45%	4.70%	10.16%	1.74%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
ET Energy Transfer LP	6.87%	7.97%	6.51%	8.95%	7.33%	7.41%	17.27%	9.51%	9.24%	6.66%	5.90%	7.42%

Drawdowns

EXE vs. ET - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EXE drawdown since its inception was -29.69%, smaller than the maximum ET drawdown of -87.81%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EXE and ET.

Drawdown Indicators

	EXE	ET	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-29.69%	-87.81%	+58.12%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-22.90%	-17.33%	-5.57%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-29.69%	-25.82%	-3.87%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-72.82%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-10.18%	-1.88%	-8.30%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-10.60%	-25.95%	+15.35%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	12.54%	6.24%	+6.30%

Volatility

EXE vs. ET - Volatility Comparison

Expand Energy Corp (EXE) has a higher volatility of 8.76% compared to Energy Transfer LP (ET) at 4.96%. This indicates that EXE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ET based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	EXE	ET	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	8.76%	4.96%	+3.80%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	24.93%	11.68%	+13.25%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	33.58%	23.80%	+9.78%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	35.10%	25.48%	+9.62%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	35.03%	36.63%	-1.60%

Financials