PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EUDV vs. NOBL
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

EUDV vs. NOBL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ProShares MSCI Europe Dividend Growers ETF (EUDV) and ProShares S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats ETF (NOBL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EUDV achieves a 0.21% return, which is significantly lower than NOBL's 6.48% return. Over the past 10 years, EUDV has underperformed NOBL with an annualized return of 5.53%, while NOBL has yielded a comparatively higher 9.97% annualized return.


EUDV

1D
-0.40%
1M
-2.70%
YTD
0.21%
6M
0.08%
1Y
-1.24%
3Y*
7.37%
5Y*
1.81%
10Y*
5.53%

NOBL

1D
0.68%
1M
2.27%
YTD
6.48%
6M
5.98%
1Y
12.52%
3Y*
8.50%
5Y*
6.18%
10Y*
9.97%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EUDV vs. NOBL - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
EUDV
ProShares MSCI Europe Dividend Growers ETF
0.21%14.05%0.03%20.41%-24.87%19.56%5.81%25.89%-11.12%21.57%
NOBL
ProShares S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats ETF
6.48%6.84%6.72%8.09%-6.52%25.46%8.35%27.39%-3.26%21.02%

Correlation

The correlation between EUDV and NOBL is 0.56, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.56

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.57

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.63

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.59

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 11, 2015

0.57

The correlation between EUDV and NOBL has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.56 to 0.63 - a consistent structural relationship.

EUDV vs. NOBL - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
EUDV
NOBL

Industrials

20.5%
20.2%

Healthcare

16.5%
10.2%

Financial Services

13.6%
12.8%

Technology

12.1%
4.6%

Basic Materials

11.2%
10.2%

Consumer Defensive

11.0%
23.6%

Utilities

8.9%
5.7%

Communication Services

4.1%

-

Energy

2.2%
2.9%

Real Estate

2.0%
4.6%

Consumer Cyclical

-

5.3%

Industrials

EUDV
20.5%
NOBL
20.2%

Healthcare

EUDV
16.5%
NOBL
10.2%

Financial Services

EUDV
13.6%
NOBL
12.8%

Technology

EUDV
12.1%
NOBL
4.6%

Basic Materials

EUDV
11.2%
NOBL
10.2%

Consumer Defensive

EUDV
11.0%
NOBL
23.6%

Utilities

EUDV
8.9%
NOBL
5.7%

Communication Services

EUDV
4.1%
NOBL

-

Energy

EUDV
2.2%
NOBL
2.9%

Real Estate

EUDV
2.0%
NOBL
4.6%

Consumer Cyclical

EUDV

-

NOBL
5.3%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

EUDV vs. NOBL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EUDV
EUDV Risk / Return Rank: 88
Overall Rank
EUDV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 88
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EUDV Sortino Ratio Rank: 77
Sortino Ratio Rank
EUDV Omega Ratio Rank: 77
Omega Ratio Rank
EUDV Calmar Ratio Rank: 88
Calmar Ratio Rank
EUDV Martin Ratio Rank: 77
Martin Ratio Rank

NOBL
NOBL Risk / Return Rank: 2929
Overall Rank
NOBL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3131
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NOBL Sortino Ratio Rank: 3232
Sortino Ratio Rank
NOBL Omega Ratio Rank: 2828
Omega Ratio Rank
NOBL Calmar Ratio Rank: 2828
Calmar Ratio Rank
NOBL Martin Ratio Rank: 2727
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EUDV vs. NOBL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares MSCI Europe Dividend Growers ETF (EUDV) and ProShares S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats ETF (NOBL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


EUDVNOBLDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.18

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.70

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.00

1.19

-0.19

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.12

1.38

-1.50

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.31

3.50

-3.82

EUDV vs. NOBL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EUDV Sharpe Ratio is -0.09, which is lower than the NOBL Sharpe Ratio of 1.10. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EUDV and NOBL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

EUDV vs. NOBL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EUDV drawdown since its inception was -37.51%, which is greater than NOBL's maximum drawdown of -35.43%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EUDV and NOBL.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


EUDVNOBLDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-37.51%

-35.43%

-2.08%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.63%

-9.11%

-1.52%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.69%

-15.36%

+1.67%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-37.51%

-17.92%

-19.59%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-37.51%

-35.43%

-2.08%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.62%

-3.29%

-2.33%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.58%

-3.48%

-5.10%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.97%

3.58%

+0.39%

Volatility

EUDV vs. NOBL - Volatility Comparison

ProShares MSCI Europe Dividend Growers ETF (EUDV) has a higher volatility of 3.91% compared to ProShares S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats ETF (NOBL) at 3.31%. This indicates that EUDV's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than NOBL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


EUDVNOBLDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.91%

3.31%

+0.60%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.49%

8.22%

+3.27%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.19%

11.52%

+2.67%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.18%

14.38%

+1.80%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.17%

16.60%

+0.57%

EUDV vs. NOBL - Expense Ratio Comparison

EUDV has a 0.55% expense ratio, which is higher than NOBL's 0.35% expense ratio.


Dividends

EUDV vs. NOBL - Dividend Comparison

EUDV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.73%, less than NOBL's 2.06% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
EUDV
ProShares MSCI Europe Dividend Growers ETF
1.73%1.74%1.92%1.87%1.77%2.30%1.27%2.20%2.22%2.33%2.53%0.37%
NOBL
ProShares S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats ETF
2.06%2.14%2.05%2.09%1.94%1.89%2.14%1.89%2.37%1.74%2.13%2.02%

Frequently Asked Questions


EUDV and NOBL have a correlation of 0.56, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

EUDV has higher volatility (3.91%) compared to NOBL (3.31%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EUDV dropped -37.51% vs NOBL's -35.43%.

On 10-year performance, NOBL leads with 9.97% vs 5.53% for EUDV. On fees, NOBL is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, NOBL has been the lower-risk option at 3.31%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, NOBL has performed better with a 9.97% return vs 5.53%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

NOBL is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.55% for EUDV.

NOBL has the higher dividend yield at 2.06%, compared with 1.73% for EUDV.

EUDV is categorized as Europe Equities, while NOBL is Dividend. EUDV tracks MSCI Europe Dividend Masters Index, while NOBL tracks S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats Index. Their fees differ too: 0.55% for EUDV and 0.35% for NOBL.

NOBL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.10 vs -0.09), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EUDV and NOBL

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer