EUDV vs. NOBL
EUDV (ProShares MSCI Europe Dividend Growers ETF) and NOBL (ProShares S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - EUDV is a Europe Equities fund tracking the MSCI Europe Dividend Masters Index, while NOBL is a Dividend fund tracking the S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, EUDV returned 5.53%/yr vs 9.97%/yr for NOBL. A 0.57 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. EUDV charges 0.55%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for NOBL.
Performance
EUDV vs. NOBL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EUDV achieves a 0.21% return, which is significantly lower than NOBL's 6.48% return. Over the past 10 years, EUDV has underperformed NOBL with an annualized return of 5.53%, while NOBL has yielded a comparatively higher 9.97% annualized return.
EUDV
- 1D
- -0.40%
- 1M
- -2.70%
- YTD
- 0.21%
- 6M
- 0.08%
- 1Y
- -1.24%
- 3Y*
- 7.37%
- 5Y*
- 1.81%
- 10Y*
- 5.53%
NOBL
- 1D
- 0.68%
- 1M
- 2.27%
- YTD
- 6.48%
- 6M
- 5.98%
- 1Y
- 12.52%
- 3Y*
- 8.50%
- 5Y*
- 6.18%
- 10Y*
- 9.97%
EUDV vs. NOBL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EUDV ProShares MSCI Europe Dividend Growers ETF | 0.21% | 14.05% | 0.03% | 20.41% | -24.87% | 19.56% | 5.81% | 25.89% | -11.12% | 21.57% |
NOBL ProShares S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats ETF | 6.48% | 6.84% | 6.72% | 8.09% | -6.52% | 25.46% | 8.35% | 27.39% | -3.26% | 21.02% |
Correlation
The correlation between EUDV and NOBL is 0.56, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.56 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.57 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.63 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.59 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 11, 2015 | 0.57 |
The correlation between EUDV and NOBL has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.56 to 0.63 - a consistent structural relationship.
EUDV vs. NOBL - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
EUDV
NOBL
Industrials
Healthcare
Financial Services
Technology
Basic Materials
Consumer Defensive
Utilities
Communication Services
-
Energy
Real Estate
Consumer Cyclical
-
Industrials
EUDV
NOBL
Healthcare
EUDV
NOBL
Financial Services
EUDV
NOBL
Technology
EUDV
NOBL
Basic Materials
EUDV
NOBL
Consumer Defensive
EUDV
NOBL
Utilities
EUDV
NOBL
Communication Services
EUDV
NOBL
-
Energy
EUDV
NOBL
Real Estate
EUDV
NOBL
Consumer Cyclical
EUDV
-
NOBL
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
EUDV vs. NOBL — Risk / Return Rank
EUDV
NOBL
EUDV vs. NOBL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares MSCI Europe Dividend Growers ETF (EUDV) and ProShares S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats ETF (NOBL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| EUDV | NOBL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.18 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.70 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.00 | 1.19 | -0.19 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.12 | 1.38 | -1.50 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.31 | 3.50 | -3.82 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
EUDV vs. NOBL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EUDV drawdown since its inception was -37.51%, which is greater than NOBL's maximum drawdown of -35.43%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EUDV and NOBL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| EUDV | NOBL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -37.51% | -35.43% | -2.08% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.63% | -9.11% | -1.52% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -13.69% | -15.36% | +1.67% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -37.51% | -17.92% | -19.59% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -37.51% | -35.43% | -2.08% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.62% | -3.29% | -2.33% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.58% | -3.48% | -5.10% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.97% | 3.58% | +0.39% |
Volatility
EUDV vs. NOBL - Volatility Comparison
ProShares MSCI Europe Dividend Growers ETF (EUDV) has a higher volatility of 3.91% compared to ProShares S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats ETF (NOBL) at 3.31%. This indicates that EUDV's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than NOBL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| EUDV | NOBL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.91% | 3.31% | +0.60% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.49% | 8.22% | +3.27% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.19% | 11.52% | +2.67% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.18% | 14.38% | +1.80% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.17% | 16.60% | +0.57% |
EUDV vs. NOBL - Expense Ratio Comparison
EUDV has a 0.55% expense ratio, which is higher than NOBL's 0.35% expense ratio.
Dividends
EUDV vs. NOBL - Dividend Comparison
EUDV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.73%, less than NOBL's 2.06% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EUDV ProShares MSCI Europe Dividend Growers ETF | 1.73% | 1.74% | 1.92% | 1.87% | 1.77% | 2.30% | 1.27% | 2.20% | 2.22% | 2.33% | 2.53% | 0.37% |
NOBL ProShares S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats ETF | 2.06% | 2.14% | 2.05% | 2.09% | 1.94% | 1.89% | 2.14% | 1.89% | 2.37% | 1.74% | 2.13% | 2.02% |
Frequently Asked Questions
EUDV and NOBL have a correlation of 0.56, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
EUDV has higher volatility (3.91%) compared to NOBL (3.31%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EUDV dropped -37.51% vs NOBL's -35.43%.
On 10-year performance, NOBL leads with 9.97% vs 5.53% for EUDV. On fees, NOBL is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, NOBL has been the lower-risk option at 3.31%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, NOBL has performed better with a 9.97% return vs 5.53%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
NOBL is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.55% for EUDV.
NOBL has the higher dividend yield at 2.06%, compared with 1.73% for EUDV.
EUDV is categorized as Europe Equities, while NOBL is Dividend. EUDV tracks MSCI Europe Dividend Masters Index, while NOBL tracks S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats Index. Their fees differ too: 0.55% for EUDV and 0.35% for NOBL.
NOBL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.10 vs -0.09), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for EUDV and NOBL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer