PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ETHD vs. NOBL
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

ETHD vs. NOBL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ProShares UltraShort Ether ETF (ETHD) and ProShares S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats ETF (NOBL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

ETHD vs. NOBL - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
ETHD
ProShares UltraShort Ether ETF
24.55%-72.49%-42.57%
NOBL
ProShares S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats ETF
2.32%6.84%3.94%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ETHD achieves a 24.55% return, which is significantly higher than NOBL's 2.32% return.


ETHD

1D
-3.95%
1M
-18.40%
YTD
24.55%
6M
83.22%
1Y
-84.46%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

NOBL

1D
-0.04%
1M
-6.79%
YTD
2.32%
6M
4.06%
1Y
6.18%
3Y*
7.40%
5Y*
6.30%
10Y*
9.54%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


ETHD vs. NOBL - Expense Ratio Comparison

ETHD has a 1.01% expense ratio, which is higher than NOBL's 0.35% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

ETHD vs. NOBL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ETHD
ETHD Risk / Return Rank: 33
Overall Rank
ETHD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 33
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ETHD Sortino Ratio Rank: 44
Sortino Ratio Rank
ETHD Omega Ratio Rank: 44
Omega Ratio Rank
ETHD Calmar Ratio Rank: 11
Calmar Ratio Rank
ETHD Martin Ratio Rank: 44
Martin Ratio Rank

NOBL
NOBL Risk / Return Rank: 2323
Overall Rank
NOBL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2323
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NOBL Sortino Ratio Rank: 2323
Sortino Ratio Rank
NOBL Omega Ratio Rank: 2222
Omega Ratio Rank
NOBL Calmar Ratio Rank: 2424
Calmar Ratio Rank
NOBL Martin Ratio Rank: 2525
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ETHD vs. NOBL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares UltraShort Ether ETF (ETHD) and ProShares S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats ETF (NOBL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


ETHDNOBLDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

-0.56

0.41

-0.97

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

-0.61

0.70

-1.31

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

0.93

1.09

-0.16

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

-0.90

0.54

-1.44

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

-1.01

1.89

-2.90

ETHD vs. NOBL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ETHD Sharpe Ratio is -0.56, which is lower than the NOBL Sharpe Ratio of 0.41. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ETHD and NOBL, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ETHDNOBLDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.56

0.41

-0.97

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.44

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.58

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.41

0.64

-1.05

Correlation

The correlation between ETHD and NOBL is -0.23. This indicates that the assets' prices tend to move in opposite directions. Negative correlation can be particularly beneficial for diversification and risk management, as one asset may offset the losses of the other during market fluctuations.


Dividends

ETHD vs. NOBL - Dividend Comparison

ETHD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 85.90%, more than NOBL's 2.14% yield.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ETHD
ProShares UltraShort Ether ETF
85.90%156.62%19.15%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
NOBL
ProShares S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats ETF
2.14%2.14%2.05%2.09%1.94%1.89%2.14%1.89%2.37%1.74%2.13%2.02%

Drawdowns

ETHD vs. NOBL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ETHD drawdown since its inception was -95.59%, which is greater than NOBL's maximum drawdown of -35.43%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ETHD and NOBL.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


ETHDNOBLDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-95.59%

-35.43%

-60.16%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-95.50%

-11.20%

-84.30%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-17.92%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.43%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-90.27%

-7.07%

-83.20%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-63.63%

-3.45%

-60.18%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

84.73%

3.18%

+81.55%

Volatility

ETHD vs. NOBL - Volatility Comparison

ProShares UltraShort Ether ETF (ETHD) has a higher volatility of 40.47% compared to ProShares S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats ETF (NOBL) at 3.55%. This indicates that ETHD's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than NOBL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


ETHDNOBLDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

40.47%

3.55%

+36.92%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

106.90%

8.06%

+98.84%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

150.88%

15.24%

+135.64%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

146.74%

14.39%

+132.35%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

146.74%

16.59%

+130.15%