ETHD vs. NOBL
ETHD (ProShares UltraShort Ether ETF) and NOBL (ProShares S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - ETHD is a Cryptocurrency fund actively managed by ProShares, while NOBL is a Dividend fund tracking the S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats Index. ETHD is actively managed, while NOBL is passively managed. Over the past year, ETHD returned -10.25% vs 14.89% for NOBL. At a correlation of -0.19, they often move in opposite directions. ETHD charges 1.01%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for NOBL.
Performance
ETHD vs. NOBL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ETHD achieves a 30.34% return, which is significantly higher than NOBL's 11.29% return.
ETHD
- 1D
- 4.50%
- 1M
- -14.26%
- 6M
- 64.16%
- YTD
- 30.34%
- 1Y
- -10.25%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
NOBL
- 1D
- 2.38%
- 1M
- 3.24%
- 6M
- 5.51%
- YTD
- 11.29%
- 1Y
- 14.89%
- 3Y*
- 8.85%
- 5Y*
- 6.91%
- 10Y*
- 9.76%
ETHD vs. NOBL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
ETHD ProShares UltraShort Ether ETF | 30.34% | -72.49% | -38.58% |
NOBL ProShares S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats ETF | 11.29% | 6.84% | 3.78% |
Correlation
The correlation between ETHD and NOBL is -0.11, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.11 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 7, 2024 | -0.19 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ETHD vs. NOBL — Risk / Return Rank
ETHD
NOBL
ETHD vs. NOBL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares UltraShort Ether ETF (ETHD) and ProShares S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats ETF (NOBL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| ETHD | NOBL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.34 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.09 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.10 | 1.22 | -0.11 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.17 | 1.64 | -1.81 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.27 | 4.15 | -4.42 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
ETHD vs. NOBL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ETHD drawdown since its inception was -95.59%, which is greater than NOBL's maximum drawdown of -35.43%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ETHD and NOBL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ETHD | NOBL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -95.59% | -35.43% | -60.16% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -60.45% | -9.11% | -51.34% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -15.36% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -17.92% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -35.43% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -89.82% | -0.69% | -89.13% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -67.04% | -3.47% | -63.57% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 38.15% | 3.60% | +34.55% |
Volatility
ETHD vs. NOBL - Volatility Comparison
ProShares UltraShort Ether ETF (ETHD) has a higher volatility of 29.48% compared to ProShares S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats ETF (NOBL) at 4.72%. This indicates that ETHD's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than NOBL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ETHD | NOBL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 29.48% | 4.72% | +24.76% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 94.34% | 8.85% | +85.49% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 136.33% | 11.82% | +124.51% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 141.48% | 14.47% | +127.01% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 141.48% | 16.61% | +124.87% |
ETHD vs. NOBL - Expense Ratio Comparison
ETHD has a 1.01% expense ratio, which is higher than NOBL's 0.35% expense ratio.
Dividends
ETHD vs. NOBL - Dividend Comparison
ETHD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.71%, more than NOBL's 2.03% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ETHD ProShares UltraShort Ether ETF | 5.71% | 156.62% | 19.15% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
NOBL ProShares S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats ETF | 2.03% | 2.14% | 2.05% | 2.09% | 1.94% | 1.89% | 2.14% | 1.89% | 2.37% | 1.74% | 2.13% | 2.02% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ETHD and NOBL have a correlation of -0.11, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
ETHD has higher volatility (29.48%) compared to NOBL (4.72%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ETHD dropped -95.59% vs NOBL's -35.43%.
On 1-year performance, NOBL leads with 14.89% vs -10.25% for ETHD. On fees, NOBL is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, NOBL has been the lower-risk option at 4.72%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, NOBL has performed better with a 14.89% return vs -10.25%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
NOBL is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 1.01% for ETHD.
ETHD has the higher dividend yield at 5.71%, compared with 2.03% for NOBL.
ETHD is categorized as Cryptocurrency, while NOBL is Dividend. Their fees differ too: 1.01% for ETHD and 0.35% for NOBL.
NOBL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.27 vs -0.08), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for ETHD and NOBL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer