ETHD vs. BTRN
ETHD (ProShares UltraShort Ether ETF) and BTRN (Global X Bitcoin Trend Strategy ETF) are both Cryptocurrency funds. ETHD is actively managed, while BTRN is passively managed. Over the past year, ETHD returned -2.03% vs -21.78% for BTRN. Their -0.59 correlation means they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. ETHD charges 1.01%/yr vs 0.95%/yr for BTRN.
Performance
ETHD vs. BTRN - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ETHD achieves a 29.25% return, which is significantly higher than BTRN's -10.78% return.
ETHD
- 1D
- 5.65%
- 1M
- -20.75%
- 6M
- 13.26%
- YTD
- 29.25%
- 1Y
- -2.03%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- -50.78%
BTRN
- 1D
- -0.73%
- 1M
- -0.26%
- 6M
- -9.90%
- YTD
- -10.78%
- 1Y
- -21.78%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- -1.45%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $4.88K | $3.75K | $40.99K | |
| $15.71M | $16.45M | $23.40M |
ETHD vs. BTRN - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
ETHD ProShares UltraShort Ether ETF | 29.25% | -72.49% | -38.58% |
BTRN Global X Bitcoin Trend Strategy ETF | -10.78% | 4.89% | 11.84% |
Correlation
The correlation between ETHD and BTRN is -0.61, meaning they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. This relationship can weaken or reverse as market conditions change.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | -0.61 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 7, 2024 | -0.59 |
The correlation between ETHD and BTRN has been stable across timeframes, ranging from -0.61 to -0.59 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ETHD vs. BTRN — Risk / Return Rank
ETHD
BTRN
ETHD vs. BTRN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares UltraShort Ether ETF (ETHD) and Global X Bitcoin Trend Strategy ETF (BTRN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| ETHD | BTRN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.52 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +3.04 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.13 | 0.73 | +0.40 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.18 | -0.95 | +1.13 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.28 | -1.43 | +1.71 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
ETHD vs. BTRN - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ETHD drawdown since its inception was -95.59%, which is greater than BTRN's maximum drawdown of -36.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ETHD and BTRN.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ETHD | BTRN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -95.59% | -36.97% | -58.62% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -57.19% | -25.73% | -31.46% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -89.90% | -26.52% | -63.38% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -67.51% | -15.16% | -52.35% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 36.37% | 17.05% | +19.32% |
Volatility
ETHD vs. BTRN - Volatility Comparison
ProShares UltraShort Ether ETF (ETHD) has a higher volatility of 26.64% compared to Global X Bitcoin Trend Strategy ETF (BTRN) at 2.65%. This indicates that ETHD's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BTRN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ETHD | BTRN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 26.64% | 2.65% | +23.99% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 91.72% | 9.74% | +81.98% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 133.97% | 16.91% | +117.06% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 140.41% | 29.96% | +110.45% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 140.41% | 29.96% | +110.45% |
ETHD vs. BTRN - Expense Ratio Comparison
ETHD has a 1.01% expense ratio, which is higher than BTRN's 0.95% expense ratio.
Dividends
ETHD vs. BTRN - Dividend Comparison
ETHD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.76%, less than BTRN's 31.46% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
BTRN Global X Bitcoin Trend Strategy ETF | 31.46% | 27.76% | 2.56% |
ETHD ProShares UltraShort Ether ETF | 5.76% | 156.62% | 19.15% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ETHD and BTRN have a correlation of -0.61, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
ETHD has higher volatility (26.64%) compared to BTRN (2.65%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ETHD dropped -95.59% vs BTRN's -36.97%.
On 1-year performance, ETHD leads with -2.03% vs -21.78% for BTRN. On fees, BTRN is cheaper at 0.95% per year. On volatility, BTRN has been the lower-risk option at 2.65%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, ETHD has performed better with a -2.03% return vs -21.78%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
BTRN is cheaper with a 0.95% expense ratio, compared with 1.01% for ETHD.
BTRN has the higher dividend yield at 31.46%, compared with 5.76% for ETHD.
They also come from different issuers: ProShares and Global X. Their fees differ too: 1.01% for ETHD and 0.95% for BTRN.
ETHD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.08 vs -1.44), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for ETHD and BTRN
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer