PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ET vs. REIT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ET vs. REIT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Energy Transfer LP (ET) and ALPS Active REIT ETF (REIT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ET achieves a 19.85% return, which is significantly higher than REIT's 17.44% return.


ET

1D
1.65%
1M
-5.36%
YTD
19.85%
6M
19.34%
1Y
12.14%
3Y*
24.04%
5Y*
20.15%
10Y*
13.14%

REIT

1D
0.97%
1M
4.83%
YTD
17.44%
6M
17.70%
1Y
18.15%
3Y*
11.38%
5Y*
4.64%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ET vs. REIT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
ET
Energy Transfer LP
19.85%-9.37%53.87%27.87%55.74%7.14%
REIT
ALPS Active REIT ETF
17.44%-0.55%7.11%13.74%-21.23%33.02%

Correlation

The correlation between ET and REIT is 0.01, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.01

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.22

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.29

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 26, 2021

0.28

Over the past year, the correlation between ET and REIT has dropped to 0.01 - well below their long-term average of 0.28, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ET vs. REIT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ET
ET Risk / Return Rank: 6363
Overall Rank
ET Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6666
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ET Sortino Ratio Rank: 6060
Sortino Ratio Rank
ET Omega Ratio Rank: 5656
Omega Ratio Rank
ET Calmar Ratio Rank: 6767
Calmar Ratio Rank
ET Martin Ratio Rank: 6767
Martin Ratio Rank

REIT
REIT Risk / Return Rank: 4444
Overall Rank
REIT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4242
Sharpe Ratio Rank
REIT Sortino Ratio Rank: 4040
Sortino Ratio Rank
REIT Omega Ratio Rank: 4040
Omega Ratio Rank
REIT Calmar Ratio Rank: 5353
Calmar Ratio Rank
REIT Martin Ratio Rank: 4646
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ET vs. REIT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Energy Transfer LP (ET) and ALPS Active REIT ETF (REIT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


ETREITDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.61

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.64

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.13

1.23

-0.11

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.22

2.35

-1.13

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.70

6.81

-4.11

ET vs. REIT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ET Sharpe Ratio is 0.71, which is lower than the REIT Sharpe Ratio of 1.32. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ET and REIT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

ET vs. REIT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ET drawdown since its inception was -87.81%, which is greater than REIT's maximum drawdown of -29.30%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ET and REIT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ETREITDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-87.81%

-29.30%

-58.51%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.38%

-7.35%

-2.03%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-24.56%

-18.19%

-6.37%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.82%

-29.30%

+3.48%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-72.82%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-6.47%

0.00%

-6.47%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-25.72%

-10.32%

-15.40%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.65%

2.53%

+2.12%

Volatility

ET vs. REIT - Volatility Comparison

Energy Transfer LP (ET) has a higher volatility of 5.08% compared to ALPS Active REIT ETF (REIT) at 4.60%. This indicates that ET's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than REIT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ETREITDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.08%

4.60%

+0.48%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.03%

9.43%

+2.60%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.13%

13.07%

+3.06%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

24.86%

18.48%

+6.38%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

34.99%

18.37%

+16.62%

Dividends

ET vs. REIT - Dividend Comparison

ET's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.00%, more than REIT's 2.69% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ET
Energy Transfer LP
7.00%7.97%6.51%8.95%7.33%7.41%17.27%9.51%9.24%6.66%5.90%7.42%
REIT
ALPS Active REIT ETF
2.69%3.20%3.06%3.13%2.81%4.71%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


ET and REIT have a correlation of 0.01, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

ET has higher volatility (5.08%) compared to REIT (4.60%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ET dropped -87.81% vs REIT's -29.30%.

REIT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.32 vs 0.71), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ET and REIT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer