REIT vs. SCHG
REIT (ALPS Active REIT ETF) and SCHG (Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - REIT is a REIT fund actively managed by ALPS, while SCHG is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the Dow Jones U.S. Large-Cap Growth Total Stock Market Index. REIT is actively managed, while SCHG is passively managed. Over the past 5 years, REIT returned 4.38%/yr vs 16.21%/yr for SCHG. At a 0.42 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. REIT charges 0.68%/yr vs 0.04%/yr for SCHG.
Performance
REIT vs. SCHG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, REIT achieves a 12.74% return, which is significantly higher than SCHG's 7.74% return.
REIT
- 1D
- 0.54%
- 1M
- -0.57%
- YTD
- 12.74%
- 6M
- 12.18%
- 1Y
- 13.01%
- 3Y*
- 10.36%
- 5Y*
- 4.38%
- 10Y*
- —
SCHG
- 1D
- -0.57%
- 1M
- 5.91%
- YTD
- 7.74%
- 6M
- 7.31%
- 1Y
- 27.05%
- 3Y*
- 25.53%
- 5Y*
- 16.21%
- 10Y*
- 18.92%
REIT vs. SCHG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
REIT ALPS Active REIT ETF | 12.74% | -0.55% | 7.11% | 13.74% | -21.23% | 33.56% |
SCHG Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF | 7.74% | 17.50% | 34.95% | 50.10% | -31.80% | 28.52% |
Correlation
The correlation between REIT and SCHG is 0.14, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.14 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.27 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.42 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 1, 2021 | 0.42 |
Over the past year, the correlation between REIT and SCHG has dropped to 0.14 - well below their long-term average of 0.42, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
REIT vs. SCHG - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
REIT
SCHG
Real Estate
Basic Materials
-
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
Financial Services
-
Healthcare
-
Industrials
-
Technology
-
Utilities
-
Real Estate
REIT
SCHG
Basic Materials
REIT
-
SCHG
Communication Services
REIT
-
SCHG
Consumer Cyclical
REIT
-
SCHG
Consumer Defensive
REIT
-
SCHG
Energy
REIT
-
SCHG
Financial Services
REIT
-
SCHG
Healthcare
REIT
-
SCHG
Industrials
REIT
-
SCHG
Technology
REIT
-
SCHG
Utilities
REIT
-
SCHG
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
REIT vs. SCHG — Risk / Return Rank
REIT
SCHG
REIT vs. SCHG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ALPS Active REIT ETF (REIT) and Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| REIT | SCHG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.02 | 1.76 | -0.74 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.41 | 2.37 | -0.96 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.18 | 1.31 | -0.13 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.81 | 1.70 | +0.11 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.26 | 5.70 | -0.44 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| REIT | SCHG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.02 | 1.76 | -0.74 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.24 | 0.73 | -0.49 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.88 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.39 | 0.85 | -0.46 |
Drawdowns
REIT vs. SCHG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum REIT drawdown since its inception was -29.30%, smaller than the maximum SCHG drawdown of -34.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for REIT and SCHG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| REIT | SCHG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -29.30% | -34.59% | +5.29% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.35% | -16.41% | +9.06% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -18.19% | -23.39% | +5.20% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -29.30% | -34.59% | +5.29% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -34.59% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.70% | -0.57% | -2.13% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.39% | -5.20% | -5.19% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.53% | 4.90% | -2.37% |
Volatility
REIT vs. SCHG - Volatility Comparison
ALPS Active REIT ETF (REIT) has a higher volatility of 3.88% compared to Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG) at 3.31%. This indicates that REIT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SCHG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| REIT | SCHG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.88% | 3.31% | +0.57% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.08% | 11.56% | -2.48% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.78% | 15.45% | -2.67% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.45% | 22.27% | -3.82% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.38% | 21.55% | -3.17% |
REIT vs. SCHG - Expense Ratio Comparison
REIT has a 0.68% expense ratio, which is higher than SCHG's 0.04% expense ratio.
Dividends
REIT vs. SCHG - Dividend Comparison
REIT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.80%, more than SCHG's 0.36% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
REIT ALPS Active REIT ETF | 2.80% | 3.20% | 3.06% | 3.13% | 2.81% | 4.71% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SCHG Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF | 0.36% | 0.36% | 0.39% | 0.46% | 0.55% | 0.42% | 0.52% | 0.82% | 1.27% | 1.01% | 1.04% | 1.22% |
Frequently Asked Questions
REIT and SCHG have a correlation of 0.14, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
REIT has higher volatility (3.88%) compared to SCHG (3.31%). In terms of maximum drawdown, REIT dropped -29.30% vs SCHG's -34.59%.
On 5-year performance, SCHG leads with 16.21% vs 4.38% for REIT. On fees, SCHG is cheaper at 0.04% per year. On volatility, SCHG has been the lower-risk option at 3.31%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, SCHG has performed better with a 16.21% return vs 4.38%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SCHG is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.68% for REIT.
REIT has the higher dividend yield at 2.80%, compared with 0.36% for SCHG.
REIT is categorized as REIT, while SCHG is Large Cap Growth Equities. They also come from different issuers: ALPS and Charles Schwab. Their fees differ too: 0.68% for REIT and 0.04% for SCHG.
SCHG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.76 vs 1.02), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for REIT and SCHG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer