PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
REIT vs. VGT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

REIT vs. VGT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ALPS Active REIT ETF (REIT) and Vanguard Information Technology ETF (VGT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with REIT having a 20.23% return and VGT slightly higher at 20.36%.


REIT

1D
-0.31%
1M
1.11%
6M
17.22%
YTD
20.23%
1Y
24.03%
3Y*
10.70%
5Y*
4.59%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
8.11%

VGT

1D
-0.38%
1M
-1.30%
6M
21.30%
YTD
20.36%
1Y
34.81%
3Y*
26.48%
5Y*
17.81%
10Y*
24.06%
ALL TIME*
14.84%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$394.47K$325.27K$309.55K
$440.89M$515.41M$573.34M

REIT vs. VGT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
REIT
ALPS Active REIT ETF
20.23%-0.55%7.11%13.74%-21.23%33.02%
VGT
Vanguard Information Technology ETF
20.36%21.77%29.30%52.66%-29.70%30.38%

Correlation

The correlation between REIT and VGT is -0.02, meaning there was essentially no consistent relationship between their historical price movements. Each responded to its own set of market drivers.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

-0.02

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.20

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.37

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 26, 2021

0.36

The correlation between REIT and VGT shifts across timeframes, from -0.02 (1 year) to 0.37 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

REIT vs. VGT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

REIT
REIT Risk / Return Rank: 7979
Overall Rank
REIT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7878
Sharpe Ratio Rank
REIT Sortino Ratio Rank: 7575
Sortino Ratio Rank
REIT Omega Ratio Rank: 7575
Omega Ratio Rank
REIT Calmar Ratio Rank: 8585
Calmar Ratio Rank
REIT Martin Ratio Rank: 7979
Martin Ratio Rank

VGT
VGT Risk / Return Rank: 5252
Overall Rank
VGT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5555
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VGT Sortino Ratio Rank: 5252
Sortino Ratio Rank
VGT Omega Ratio Rank: 5050
Omega Ratio Rank
VGT Calmar Ratio Rank: 5555
Calmar Ratio Rank
VGT Martin Ratio Rank: 4646
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

REIT vs. VGT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ALPS Active REIT ETF (REIT) and Vanguard Information Technology ETF (VGT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


REITVGTDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.47

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.60

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.31

1.23

+0.09

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.23

1.94

+1.29

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.12

5.23

+4.89

REIT vs. VGT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current REIT Sharpe Ratio is 1.78, which is higher than the VGT Sharpe Ratio of 1.31. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of REIT and VGT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

REIT vs. VGT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum REIT drawdown since its inception was -29.30%, smaller than the maximum VGT drawdown of -54.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for REIT and VGT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


REITVGTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-29.30%

-54.63%

+25.33%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.35%

-16.40%

+9.05%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.19%

-27.23%

+9.04%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-29.30%

-35.07%

+5.77%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.07%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.31%

-9.93%

+7.62%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.09%

-7.95%

-2.14%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.34%

6.07%

-3.73%

Volatility

REIT vs. VGT - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for ALPS Active REIT ETF (REIT) is 4.58%, while Vanguard Information Technology ETF (VGT) has a volatility of 8.42%. This indicates that REIT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VGT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


REITVGTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.58%

8.42%

-3.84%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.45%

20.14%

-9.69%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.41%

24.28%

-10.87%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.51%

25.83%

-7.32%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.32%

24.89%

-6.57%

REIT vs. VGT - Expense Ratio Comparison

REIT has a 0.68% expense ratio, which is higher than VGT's 0.09% expense ratio.


Dividends

REIT vs. VGT - Dividend Comparison

REIT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.65%, more than VGT's 0.38% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
REIT
ALPS Active REIT ETF
2.65%3.20%3.06%3.13%2.81%4.71%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
VGT
Vanguard Information Technology ETF
0.38%0.40%0.60%0.65%0.91%0.64%0.82%1.11%1.29%0.99%1.31%1.28%

Frequently Asked Questions


REIT and VGT have a correlation of -0.02, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

VGT has higher volatility (8.42%) compared to REIT (4.58%). In terms of maximum drawdown, REIT dropped -29.30% vs VGT's -54.63%.

On 5-year performance, VGT leads with 17.81% vs 4.59% for REIT. On fees, VGT is cheaper at 0.09% per year. On volatility, REIT has been the lower-risk option at 4.58%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, VGT has performed better with a 17.81% return vs 4.59%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VGT is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.68% for REIT.

REIT has the higher dividend yield at 2.65%, compared with 0.38% for VGT.

REIT is categorized as REIT, while VGT is Technology Equities. They also come from different issuers: ALPS and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.68% for REIT and 0.09% for VGT.

REIT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.78 vs 1.31), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for REIT and VGT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer