ESBG vs. CIBR
ESBG (First Trust Enhanced Stocks, Bonds & Gold ETF) and CIBR (First Trust NASDAQ Cybersecurity ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - ESBG is a Tactical Allocation fund actively managed by First Trust, while CIBR is a Cybersecurity fund tracking the Nasdaq CTA Cybersecurity Index. ESBG is actively managed, while CIBR is passively managed. At a 0.21 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. ESBG charges 0.95%/yr vs 0.60%/yr for CIBR.
Performance
ESBG vs. CIBR - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ESBG achieves a -2.86% return, which is significantly lower than CIBR's 28.87% return.
ESBG
- 1D
- -2.33%
- 1M
- -2.85%
- 6M
- -8.17%
- YTD
- -2.86%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CIBR
- 1D
- -0.04%
- 1M
- 7.72%
- 6M
- 26.20%
- YTD
- 28.87%
- 1Y
- 27.22%
- 3Y*
- 26.81%
- 5Y*
- 14.60%
- 10Y*
- 18.39%
ESBG vs. CIBR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
ESBG First Trust Enhanced Stocks, Bonds & Gold ETF | -2.86% | 5.67% |
CIBR First Trust NASDAQ Cybersecurity ETF | 28.87% | -2.16% |
Correlation
The correlation between ESBG and CIBR is 0.21, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 19, 2025 | 0.21 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ESBG vs. CIBR — Risk / Return Rank
ESBG
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
CIBR
ESBG vs. CIBR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Enhanced Stocks, Bonds & Gold ETF (ESBG) and First Trust NASDAQ Cybersecurity ETF (CIBR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| ESBG | CIBR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.20 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 1.24 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 2.88 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
ESBG vs. CIBR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ESBG drawdown since its inception was -18.84%, smaller than the maximum CIBR drawdown of -33.89%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ESBG and CIBR.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ESBG | CIBR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -18.84% | -33.89% | +15.05% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -21.99% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -21.99% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -33.89% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -33.89% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -17.63% | -2.57% | -15.06% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.74% | -8.64% | +0.90% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 9.47% | — |
Volatility
ESBG vs. CIBR - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ESBG | CIBR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 7.35% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 22.17% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 25.71% | 25.55% | +0.16% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 25.71% | 25.21% | +0.50% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 25.71% | 23.59% | +2.12% |
ESBG vs. CIBR - Expense Ratio Comparison
ESBG has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than CIBR's 0.60% expense ratio.
Dividends
ESBG vs. CIBR - Dividend Comparison
ESBG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.12%, more than CIBR's 0.43% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CIBR First Trust NASDAQ Cybersecurity ETF | 0.43% | 0.42% | 0.29% | 0.42% | 0.31% | 0.59% | 1.10% | 0.23% | 0.23% | 0.10% | 0.77% | 0.58% |
ESBG First Trust Enhanced Stocks, Bonds & Gold ETF | 1.12% | 0.24% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ESBG and CIBR have a correlation of 0.21, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, CIBR is cheaper at 0.60% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
CIBR is cheaper with a 0.60% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for ESBG.
ESBG has the higher dividend yield at 1.12%, compared with 0.43% for CIBR.
ESBG is categorized as Tactical Allocation, while CIBR is Cybersecurity. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for ESBG and 0.60% for CIBR.
Find the right allocation for ESBG and CIBR
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer