PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ESBG vs. GDT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ESBG vs. GDT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in First Trust Enhanced Stocks, Bonds & Gold ETF (ESBG) and WisdomTree Efficient TIPS Plus Gold Fund (GDT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


ESBG

1D
0.19%
1M
0.78%
YTD
6.36%
6M
8.12%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

GDT

1D
0.11%
1M
-2.71%
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ESBG vs. GDT - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between ESBG and GDT is 0.93, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 23, 2026

0.93

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ESBG vs. GDT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Enhanced Stocks, Bonds & Gold ETF (ESBG) and WisdomTree Efficient TIPS Plus Gold Fund (GDT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

ESBG vs. GDT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ESBGGDTDifference

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.00

-0.57

+1.57

Drawdowns

ESBG vs. GDT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ESBG drawdown since its inception was -18.84%, roughly equal to the maximum GDT drawdown of -18.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ESBG and GDT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ESBGGDTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-18.84%

-18.06%

-0.78%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-9.80%

-15.35%

+5.55%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.21%

-9.83%

+3.62%

Volatility

ESBG vs. GDT - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ESBGGDTDifference

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

25.31%

33.53%

-8.22%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

25.31%

33.53%

-8.22%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

25.31%

33.53%

-8.22%

ESBG vs. GDT - Expense Ratio Comparison

ESBG has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than GDT's 0.30% expense ratio.


Dividends

ESBG vs. GDT - Dividend Comparison

ESBG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.57%, less than GDT's 1.75% yield.


Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.93, ESBG and GDT move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

On fees, GDT is cheaper at 0.30% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

GDT is cheaper with a 0.30% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for ESBG.

GDT has the higher dividend yield at 1.75%, compared with 0.57% for ESBG.

They also come from different issuers: First Trust and WisdomTree. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for ESBG and 0.30% for GDT.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ESBG and GDT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer