ESBG vs. TDSA
ESBG (First Trust Enhanced Stocks, Bonds & Gold ETF) and TDSA (Cabana Target Drawdown 5 ETF) are both Tactical Allocation funds. ESBG is actively managed, while TDSA is passively managed. ESBG charges 0.95%/yr vs 0.83%/yr for TDSA.
Performance
ESBG vs. TDSA - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
ESBG
- 1D
- 0.19%
- 1M
- 0.78%
- YTD
- 6.36%
- 6M
- 8.12%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
TDSA
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.00%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ESBG vs. TDSA - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
ESBG First Trust Enhanced Stocks, Bonds & Gold ETF | -3.90% |
TDSA Cabana Target Drawdown 5 ETF | 0.00% |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ESBG vs. TDSA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Enhanced Stocks, Bonds & Gold ETF (ESBG) and Cabana Target Drawdown 5 ETF (TDSA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ESBG | TDSA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.00 | — | — |
Drawdowns
ESBG vs. TDSA - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ESBG drawdown since its inception was -18.84%, which is greater than TDSA's maximum drawdown of 0.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ESBG and TDSA.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ESBG | TDSA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -18.84% | 0.00% | -18.84% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -9.80% | 0.00% | -9.80% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.21% | 0.00% | -6.21% |
Volatility
ESBG vs. TDSA - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ESBG | TDSA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 25.31% | 0.00% | +25.31% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 25.31% | 0.00% | +25.31% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 25.31% | 0.00% | +25.31% |
ESBG vs. TDSA - Expense Ratio Comparison
ESBG has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than TDSA's 0.83% expense ratio.
Dividends
ESBG vs. TDSA - Dividend Comparison
ESBG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.57%, while TDSA has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
ESBG First Trust Enhanced Stocks, Bonds & Gold ETF | 0.57% | 0.24% |
TDSA Cabana Target Drawdown 5 ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
On fees, TDSA is cheaper at 0.83% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
TDSA is cheaper with a 0.83% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for ESBG.
ESBG has the higher dividend yield at 0.57%, compared with 0.00% for TDSA.
They also come from different issuers: First Trust and Cabana. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for ESBG and 0.83% for TDSA.
Find the right allocation for ESBG and TDSA
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer