PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ESBG vs. CTAP
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ESBG vs. CTAP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in First Trust Enhanced Stocks, Bonds & Gold ETF (ESBG) and Simplify US Equity PLUS Managed Futures Strategy ETF (CTAP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ESBG achieves a 6.36% return, which is significantly lower than CTAP's 22.34% return.


ESBG

1D
0.19%
1M
0.78%
YTD
6.36%
6M
8.12%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

CTAP

1D
0.68%
1M
-1.60%
YTD
22.34%
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ESBG vs. CTAP - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between ESBG and CTAP is 0.23, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 10, 2025

0.23

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ESBG vs. CTAP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Enhanced Stocks, Bonds & Gold ETF (ESBG) and Simplify US Equity PLUS Managed Futures Strategy ETF (CTAP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

ESBG vs. CTAP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ESBGCTAPDifference

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.00

2.56

-1.57

Drawdowns

ESBG vs. CTAP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ESBG drawdown since its inception was -18.84%, which is greater than CTAP's maximum drawdown of -9.02%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ESBG and CTAP.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ESBGCTAPDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-18.84%

-9.02%

-9.82%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-9.80%

-4.16%

-5.64%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.21%

-2.16%

-4.05%

Volatility

ESBG vs. CTAP - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ESBGCTAPDifference

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

25.31%

24.03%

+1.28%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

25.31%

24.03%

+1.28%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

25.31%

24.03%

+1.28%

ESBG vs. CTAP - Expense Ratio Comparison

ESBG has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than CTAP's 0.10% expense ratio.


Dividends

ESBG vs. CTAP - Dividend Comparison

ESBG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.57%, less than CTAP's 0.64% yield.


Frequently Asked Questions


ESBG and CTAP have a correlation of 0.23, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, CTAP is cheaper at 0.10% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

CTAP is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for ESBG.

CTAP has the higher dividend yield at 0.64%, compared with 0.57% for ESBG.

ESBG is categorized as Tactical Allocation, while CTAP is Diversified Portfolio. They also come from different issuers: First Trust and Simplify. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for ESBG and 0.10% for CTAP.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ESBG and CTAP

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer