EQT vs. WSM
EQT (EQT Corporation) and WSM (Williams-Sonoma, Inc.) are both stocks. EQT operates in Oil & Gas E&P (Energy), while WSM operates in Specialty Retail (Consumer Cyclical). Over the past 10 years, EQT returned 3.39%/yr vs 27.10%/yr for WSM. At a 0.19 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
EQT vs. WSM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EQT achieves a -2.55% return, which is significantly lower than WSM's 26.06% return. Over the past 10 years, EQT has underperformed WSM with an annualized return of 3.39%, while WSM has yielded a comparatively higher 27.10% annualized return.
EQT
- 1D
- 1.45%
- 1M
- -7.13%
- YTD
- -2.55%
- 6M
- -6.00%
- 1Y
- -5.35%
- 3Y*
- 11.65%
- 5Y*
- 19.29%
- 10Y*
- 3.39%
WSM
- 1D
- 2.19%
- 1M
- 29.92%
- YTD
- 26.06%
- 6M
- 20.02%
- 1Y
- 46.51%
- 3Y*
- 53.75%
- 5Y*
- 23.70%
- 10Y*
- 27.10%
EQT vs. WSM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EQT EQT Corporation | -2.55% | 17.64% | 21.41% | 16.20% | 57.64% | 71.60% | 17.27% | -41.82% | -38.82% | -12.80% |
WSM Williams-Sonoma, Inc. | 26.06% | -2.09% | 86.56% | 80.24% | -30.49% | 68.60% | 42.38% | 50.07% | 0.61% | 10.20% |
Correlation
The correlation between EQT and WSM is -0.14, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.14 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.10 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.17 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.19 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 26, 1990 | 0.19 |
The correlation between EQT and WSM shifts across timeframes, from -0.14 (1 year) to 0.19 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
EQT:
$32.47B
WSM:
$26.80B
EQT:
$5.40
WSM:
$8.93
EQT:
9.61
WSM:
25.04
EQT:
0.08
WSM:
5.06
EQT:
3.21
WSM:
3.46
EQT:
1.29
WSM:
14.33
EQT:
$10.03B
WSM:
$7.88B
EQT:
$6.43B
WSM:
$3.63B
EQT:
$7.48B
WSM:
$1.49B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
EQT vs. WSM — Risk / Return Rank
EQT
WSM
EQT vs. WSM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for EQT Corporation (EQT) and Williams-Sonoma, Inc. (WSM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| EQT | WSM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.52 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.07 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.00 | 1.23 | -0.23 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.22 | 2.01 | -2.23 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.47 | 4.55 | -5.02 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
EQT vs. WSM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EQT drawdown since its inception was -91.51%, roughly equal to the maximum WSM drawdown of -89.01%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EQT and WSM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| EQT | WSM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -91.51% | -89.01% | -2.50% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -24.42% | -23.27% | -1.15% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -31.62% | -36.79% | +5.17% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -42.56% | -51.92% | +9.36% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -88.28% | -59.71% | -28.57% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -23.32% | 0.00% | -23.32% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -23.34% | -25.03% | +1.69% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 11.47% | 10.25% | +1.22% |
Volatility
EQT vs. WSM - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for EQT Corporation (EQT) is 8.36%, while Williams-Sonoma, Inc. (WSM) has a volatility of 12.02%. This indicates that EQT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than WSM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| EQT | WSM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.36% | 12.02% | -3.66% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 21.09% | 25.57% | -4.48% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 32.56% | 34.63% | -2.07% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 42.79% | 44.77% | -1.98% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 48.90% | 44.26% | +4.64% |
Dividends
EQT vs. WSM - Dividend Comparison
EQT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.26%, more than WSM's 1.23% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EQT EQT Corporation | 1.26% | 1.19% | 1.37% | 1.57% | 1.63% | 0.00% | 0.24% | 1.10% | 0.42% | 0.21% | 0.18% | 0.23% |
WSM Williams-Sonoma, Inc. | 1.23% | 1.43% | 1.16% | 1.72% | 2.65% | 1.43% | 1.93% | 2.55% | 3.33% | 2.98% | 3.02% | 2.36% |
Financials
EQT vs. WSM - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between EQT Corporation and Williams-Sonoma, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
EQT vs. WSM - Profitability Comparison
EQT - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, EQT Corporation reported a gross profit of 3.32B and revenue of 3.38B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 98.4%.
WSM - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Williams-Sonoma, Inc. reported a gross profit of 793.43M and revenue of 1.81B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 44.0%.
EQT - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, EQT Corporation reported an operating income of 2.04B and revenue of 3.38B, resulting in an operating margin of 60.3%.
WSM - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Williams-Sonoma, Inc. reported an operating income of 291.69M and revenue of 1.81B, resulting in an operating margin of 16.2%.
EQT - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, EQT Corporation reported a net income of 1.55B and revenue of 3.38B, resulting in a net margin of 46.0%.
WSM - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Williams-Sonoma, Inc. reported a net income of 231.36M and revenue of 1.81B, resulting in a net margin of 12.8%.
Frequently Asked Questions
EQT and WSM have a correlation of -0.14, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
WSM has higher volatility (12.02%) compared to EQT (8.36%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EQT dropped -91.51% vs WSM's -89.01%.
WSM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.35 vs -0.17), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for EQT and WSM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer