WSM vs. CE
Compare and contrast key facts about Williams-Sonoma, Inc. (WSM) and Celanese Corporation (CE).
Performance
WSM vs. CE - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
WSM vs. CE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
WSM Williams-Sonoma, Inc. | 2.42% | -2.09% | 86.56% | 80.24% | -30.49% | 68.60% | 42.38% | 50.07% | 0.61% | 10.20% |
CE Celanese Corporation | 55.65% | -38.76% | -54.57% | 55.69% | -37.77% | 31.75% | 8.25% | 39.85% | -14.31% | 38.52% |
Fundamentals
WSM:
$22.06B
CE:
$7.22B
WSM:
$8.84
CE:
-$10.57
WSM:
2.88
CE:
0.76
WSM:
10.59
CE:
1.78
WSM:
$7.81B
CE:
$9.54B
WSM:
$3.60B
CE:
$1.92B
WSM:
$1.55B
CE:
$193.00M
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, WSM achieves a 2.42% return, which is significantly lower than CE's 55.65% return. Over the past 10 years, WSM has outperformed CE with an annualized return of 23.78%, while CE has yielded a comparatively lower 1.77% annualized return.
WSM
- 1D
- 3.10%
- 1M
- -11.34%
- YTD
- 2.42%
- 6M
- -6.09%
- 1Y
- 17.11%
- 3Y*
- 46.82%
- 5Y*
- 17.09%
- 10Y*
- 23.78%
CE
- 1D
- 2.37%
- 1M
- 31.70%
- YTD
- 55.65%
- 6M
- 56.49%
- 1Y
- 16.14%
- 3Y*
- -14.30%
- 5Y*
- -14.00%
- 10Y*
- 1.77%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
WSM vs. CE — Risk / Return Rank
WSM
CE
WSM vs. CE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Williams-Sonoma, Inc. (WSM) and Celanese Corporation (CE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| WSM | CE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.42 | 0.25 | +0.17 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.87 | 0.82 | +0.05 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.11 | 1.10 | +0.01 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.80 | 0.36 | +0.45 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.81 | 0.63 | +1.19 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| WSM | CE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.42 | 0.25 | +0.17 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.38 | -0.32 | +0.70 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.54 | 0.05 | +0.49 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.33 | 0.20 | +0.13 |
Correlation
The correlation between WSM and CE is 0.39, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
WSM vs. CE - Dividend Comparison
WSM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.45%, more than CE's 0.18% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
WSM Williams-Sonoma, Inc. | 1.45% | 1.43% | 1.16% | 1.72% | 2.65% | 1.43% | 1.93% | 2.55% | 3.33% | 2.98% | 3.02% | 2.36% |
CE Celanese Corporation | 0.18% | 0.28% | 4.05% | 1.80% | 2.68% | 1.62% | 1.91% | 1.95% | 2.31% | 1.62% | 1.75% | 1.71% |
Drawdowns
WSM vs. CE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum WSM drawdown since its inception was -89.01%, roughly equal to the maximum CE drawdown of -84.87%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WSM and CE.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| WSM | CE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -89.01% | -84.87% | -4.14% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -20.56% | -42.98% | +22.42% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -51.92% | -78.96% | +27.04% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -59.71% | -78.96% | +19.25% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -17.37% | -61.03% | +43.66% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -25.10% | -20.27% | -4.83% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 9.07% | 24.42% | -15.35% |
Volatility
WSM vs. CE - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Williams-Sonoma, Inc. (WSM) is 8.53%, while Celanese Corporation (CE) has a volatility of 21.32%. This indicates that WSM experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| WSM | CE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.53% | 21.32% | -12.79% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 23.90% | 41.02% | -17.12% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 40.81% | 63.73% | -22.92% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 44.73% | 44.12% | +0.61% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 44.20% | 38.60% | +5.60% |
Financials
WSM vs. CE - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Williams-Sonoma, Inc. and Celanese Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
WSM vs. CE - Profitability Comparison
WSM - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Williams-Sonoma, Inc. reported a gross profit of 1.10B and revenue of 2.36B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 46.9%.
CE - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Celanese Corporation reported a gross profit of 383.00M and revenue of 2.20B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 17.4%.
WSM - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Williams-Sonoma, Inc. reported an operating income of 477.81M and revenue of 2.36B, resulting in an operating margin of 20.3%.
CE - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Celanese Corporation reported an operating income of 128.00M and revenue of 2.20B, resulting in an operating margin of 5.8%.
WSM - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Williams-Sonoma, Inc. reported a net income of 368.02M and revenue of 2.36B, resulting in a net margin of 15.6%.
CE - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Celanese Corporation reported a net income of 19.00M and revenue of 2.20B, resulting in a net margin of 0.9%.