PortfoliosLab logo
WSM vs. MUSA
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Correlation

The correlation between WSM and MUSA is 0.35, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Performance

WSM vs. MUSA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Williams-Sonoma, Inc. (WSM) and Murphy USA Inc. (MUSA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

WSM:

0.23

MUSA:

0.17

Sortino Ratio

WSM:

0.71

MUSA:

0.55

Omega Ratio

WSM:

1.09

MUSA:

1.07

Calmar Ratio

WSM:

0.31

MUSA:

0.35

Martin Ratio

WSM:

0.74

MUSA:

0.79

Ulcer Index

WSM:

15.40%

MUSA:

9.72%

Daily Std Dev

WSM:

55.27%

MUSA:

27.97%

Max Drawdown

WSM:

-89.01%

MUSA:

-33.72%

Current Drawdown

WSM:

-19.77%

MUSA:

-17.45%

Fundamentals

Market Cap

WSM:

$21.20B

MUSA:

$8.91B

EPS

WSM:

$8.79

MUSA:

$23.63

PE Ratio

WSM:

19.53

MUSA:

19.08

PEG Ratio

WSM:

2.29

MUSA:

1.70

PS Ratio

WSM:

2.75

MUSA:

0.51

PB Ratio

WSM:

9.90

MUSA:

12.38

Total Revenue (TTM)

WSM:

$6.05B

MUSA:

$19.93B

Gross Profit (TTM)

WSM:

$2.83B

MUSA:

$1.65B

EBITDA (TTM)

WSM:

$1.31B

MUSA:

$938.30M

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, WSM achieves a -5.40% return, which is significantly higher than MUSA's -8.61% return. Over the past 10 years, WSM has underperformed MUSA with an annualized return of 18.99%, while MUSA has yielded a comparatively higher 22.83% annualized return.


WSM

YTD

-5.40%

1M

26.93%

6M

34.08%

1Y

12.80%

5Y*

42.10%

10Y*

18.99%

MUSA

YTD

-8.61%

1M

-9.56%

6M

-13.35%

1Y

4.66%

5Y*

33.31%

10Y*

22.83%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

WSM vs. MUSA — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

WSM
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of WSM is 6060
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of WSM is 6161
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of WSM is 5757
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of WSM is 5656
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of WSM is 6666
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of WSM is 6060
Martin Ratio Rank

MUSA
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of MUSA is 5858
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of MUSA is 5959
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of MUSA is 5252
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of MUSA is 5252
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of MUSA is 6767
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of MUSA is 6161
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

WSM vs. MUSA - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Williams-Sonoma, Inc. (WSM) and Murphy USA Inc. (MUSA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current WSM Sharpe Ratio is 0.23, which is higher than the MUSA Sharpe Ratio of 0.17. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of WSM and MUSA, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading data...

Dividends

WSM vs. MUSA - Dividend Comparison

WSM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.36%, more than MUSA's 0.52% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
WSM
Williams-Sonoma, Inc.
1.36%1.16%1.72%2.65%1.43%1.93%2.55%3.33%2.98%3.02%2.36%1.72%
MUSA
Murphy USA Inc.
0.52%0.36%0.43%0.45%0.52%0.19%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

WSM vs. MUSA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum WSM drawdown since its inception was -89.01%, which is greater than MUSA's maximum drawdown of -33.72%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WSM and MUSA. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


Loading data...

Volatility

WSM vs. MUSA - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Williams-Sonoma, Inc. (WSM) is 10.46%, while Murphy USA Inc. (MUSA) has a volatility of 14.66%. This indicates that WSM experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MUSA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading data...

Financials

WSM vs. MUSA - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Williams-Sonoma, Inc. and Murphy USA Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


1.00B2.00B3.00B4.00B5.00B6.00B7.00BJulyOctober2021AprilJulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025
2.46B
4.53B
(WSM) Total Revenue
(MUSA) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

WSM vs. MUSA - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Williams-Sonoma, Inc. and Murphy USA Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

0.0%20.0%40.0%60.0%80.0%100.0%JulyOctober2021AprilJulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025
47.3%
10.7%
(WSM) Gross Margin
(MUSA) Gross Margin
WSM - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Williams-Sonoma, Inc. reported a gross profit of 1.17B and revenue of 2.46B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 47.3%.

MUSA - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Murphy USA Inc. reported a gross profit of 483.60M and revenue of 4.53B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 10.7%.

WSM - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Williams-Sonoma, Inc. reported an operating income of 530.14M and revenue of 2.46B, resulting in an operating margin of 21.5%.

MUSA - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Murphy USA Inc. reported an operating income of 88.00M and revenue of 4.53B, resulting in an operating margin of 1.9%.

WSM - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Williams-Sonoma, Inc. reported a net income of 410.72M and revenue of 2.46B, resulting in a net margin of 16.7%.

MUSA - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Murphy USA Inc. reported a net income of 53.20M and revenue of 4.53B, resulting in a net margin of 1.2%.