WSM vs. MUSA
Compare and contrast key facts about Williams-Sonoma, Inc. (WSM) and Murphy USA Inc. (MUSA).
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: WSM or MUSA.
Correlation
The correlation between WSM and MUSA is 0.30, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Performance
WSM vs. MUSA - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
WSM:
0.13
MUSA:
0.53
WSM:
0.57
MUSA:
0.90
WSM:
1.07
MUSA:
1.10
WSM:
0.23
MUSA:
0.60
WSM:
0.55
MUSA:
1.52
WSM:
11.47%
MUSA:
8.53%
WSM:
49.79%
MUSA:
24.63%
WSM:
-89.01%
MUSA:
-33.72%
WSM:
-24.21%
MUSA:
-13.43%
Fundamentals
WSM:
$20.38B
MUSA:
$9.51B
WSM:
$8.79
MUSA:
$24.09
WSM:
18.77
MUSA:
19.94
WSM:
2.45
MUSA:
1.75
WSM:
$7.71B
MUSA:
$15.40B
WSM:
$3.64B
MUSA:
$5.61B
WSM:
$1.69B
MUSA:
$833.20M
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, WSM achieves a -10.64% return, which is significantly lower than MUSA's -4.16% return. Over the past 10 years, WSM has underperformed MUSA with an annualized return of 18.15%, while MUSA has yielded a comparatively higher 21.16% annualized return.
WSM
-10.64%
-12.08%
8.94%
7.93%
57.42%
18.15%
MUSA
-4.16%
3.34%
-0.39%
15.02%
42.37%
21.16%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
WSM vs. MUSA — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank
WSM
MUSA
WSM vs. MUSA - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Williams-Sonoma, Inc. (WSM) and Murphy USA Inc. (MUSA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
WSM vs. MUSA - Dividend Comparison
WSM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.38%, more than MUSA's 0.39% yield.
| TTM | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
WSM Williams-Sonoma, Inc. | 1.38% | 1.16% | 1.72% | 2.65% | 1.43% | 1.93% | 2.55% | 3.33% | 2.98% | 3.02% | 2.36% | 1.72% |
MUSA Murphy USA Inc. | 0.39% | 0.36% | 0.43% | 0.45% | 0.52% | 0.19% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
WSM vs. MUSA - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum WSM drawdown since its inception was -89.01%, which is greater than MUSA's maximum drawdown of -33.72%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WSM and MUSA. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
WSM vs. MUSA - Volatility Comparison
Williams-Sonoma, Inc. (WSM) has a higher volatility of 13.46% compared to Murphy USA Inc. (MUSA) at 8.18%. This indicates that WSM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MUSA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Financials
WSM vs. MUSA - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Williams-Sonoma, Inc. and Murphy USA Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities