WSM vs. MUSA
Compare and contrast key facts about Williams-Sonoma, Inc. (WSM) and Murphy USA Inc. (MUSA).
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: WSM or MUSA.
Correlation
The correlation between WSM and MUSA is 0.30, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Performance
WSM vs. MUSA - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
WSM:
2.08
MUSA:
1.33
WSM:
2.95
MUSA:
2.05
WSM:
1.40
MUSA:
1.24
WSM:
5.11
MUSA:
2.35
WSM:
11.30
MUSA:
5.86
WSM:
9.45%
MUSA:
5.73%
WSM:
51.39%
MUSA:
23.46%
WSM:
-89.01%
MUSA:
-33.72%
WSM:
-3.76%
MUSA:
-11.97%
Fundamentals
WSM:
$25.97B
MUSA:
$10.00B
WSM:
$8.46
MUSA:
$23.23
WSM:
24.94
MUSA:
20.71
WSM:
2.62
MUSA:
2.21
WSM:
$5.25B
MUSA:
$20.24B
WSM:
$2.47B
MUSA:
$5.78B
WSM:
$1.05B
MUSA:
$951.70M
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, WSM achieves a 13.38% return, which is significantly higher than MUSA's -2.54% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with WSM having a 20.66% annualized return and MUSA not far ahead at 21.62%.
WSM
13.38%
6.60%
51.84%
93.16%
44.40%
20.66%
MUSA
-2.54%
-0.06%
-3.33%
24.69%
36.80%
21.62%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
WSM vs. MUSA — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank
WSM
MUSA
WSM vs. MUSA - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Williams-Sonoma, Inc. (WSM) and Murphy USA Inc. (MUSA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
WSM vs. MUSA - Dividend Comparison
WSM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.09%, more than MUSA's 0.37% yield.
| TTM | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
WSM Williams-Sonoma, Inc. | 1.09% | 1.16% | 1.72% | 2.65% | 1.43% | 1.93% | 2.55% | 3.33% | 2.98% | 3.02% | 2.36% | 1.72% |
MUSA Murphy USA Inc. | 0.37% | 0.36% | 0.43% | 0.45% | 0.52% | 0.19% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
WSM vs. MUSA - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum WSM drawdown since its inception was -89.01%, which is greater than MUSA's maximum drawdown of -33.72%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WSM and MUSA. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
WSM vs. MUSA - Volatility Comparison
Williams-Sonoma, Inc. (WSM) and Murphy USA Inc. (MUSA) have volatilities of 7.95% and 7.58%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Financials
WSM vs. MUSA - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Williams-Sonoma, Inc. and Murphy USA Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities