WSM vs. MUSA
Compare and contrast key facts about Williams-Sonoma, Inc. (WSM) and Murphy USA Inc. (MUSA).
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: WSM or MUSA.
Correlation
The correlation between WSM and MUSA is 0.30, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Performance
WSM vs. MUSA - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
WSM:
1.90
MUSA:
1.11
WSM:
2.79
MUSA:
1.79
WSM:
1.37
MUSA:
1.21
WSM:
4.69
MUSA:
2.05
WSM:
10.34
MUSA:
5.37
WSM:
9.46%
MUSA:
5.08%
WSM:
51.44%
MUSA:
24.63%
WSM:
-89.01%
MUSA:
-33.72%
WSM:
-0.89%
MUSA:
-13.12%
Fundamentals
WSM:
$24.44B
MUSA:
$9.79B
WSM:
$8.46
MUSA:
$24.18
WSM:
23.47
MUSA:
20.00
WSM:
2.41
MUSA:
2.14
WSM:
$7.53B
MUSA:
$15.53B
WSM:
$3.52B
MUSA:
$1.07B
WSM:
$1.57B
MUSA:
$729.60M
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, WSM achieves a 7.21% return, which is significantly higher than MUSA's -3.81% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with WSM having a 20.91% annualized return and MUSA not far ahead at 21.76%.
WSM
7.21%
2.32%
33.33%
98.81%
42.21%
20.91%
MUSA
-3.81%
-10.58%
-3.34%
28.40%
34.62%
21.76%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
WSM vs. MUSA — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank
WSM
MUSA
WSM vs. MUSA - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Williams-Sonoma, Inc. (WSM) and Murphy USA Inc. (MUSA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
WSM vs. MUSA - Dividend Comparison
WSM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.09%, more than MUSA's 0.37% yield.
| TTM | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
WSM Williams-Sonoma, Inc. | 1.09% | 1.16% | 1.72% | 2.65% | 1.43% | 1.93% | 2.55% | 3.33% | 2.98% | 3.02% | 2.36% | 1.72% |
MUSA Murphy USA Inc. | 0.37% | 0.36% | 0.43% | 0.45% | 0.52% | 0.19% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
WSM vs. MUSA - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum WSM drawdown since its inception was -89.01%, which is greater than MUSA's maximum drawdown of -33.72%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WSM and MUSA. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
WSM vs. MUSA - Volatility Comparison
Williams-Sonoma, Inc. (WSM) has a higher volatility of 10.77% compared to Murphy USA Inc. (MUSA) at 5.69%. This indicates that WSM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MUSA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Financials
WSM vs. MUSA - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Williams-Sonoma, Inc. and Murphy USA Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities