WSM vs. MUSA
Compare and contrast key facts about Williams-Sonoma, Inc. (WSM) and Murphy USA Inc. (MUSA).
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: WSM or MUSA.
Correlation
The correlation between WSM and MUSA is 0.30, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Performance
WSM vs. MUSA - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
WSM:
1.75
MUSA:
1.82
WSM:
2.64
MUSA:
2.69
WSM:
1.36
MUSA:
1.32
WSM:
4.28
MUSA:
3.74
WSM:
9.51
MUSA:
10.27
WSM:
9.40%
MUSA:
4.35%
WSM:
51.16%
MUSA:
24.63%
WSM:
-89.01%
MUSA:
-33.72%
WSM:
-6.12%
MUSA:
-6.35%
Fundamentals
WSM:
$24.40B
MUSA:
$10.93B
WSM:
$8.46
MUSA:
$24.20
WSM:
23.43
MUSA:
22.30
WSM:
2.48
MUSA:
2.40
WSM:
$7.53B
MUSA:
$20.60B
WSM:
$3.52B
MUSA:
$5.88B
WSM:
$1.57B
MUSA:
$1.00B
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, WSM achieves a 87.46% return, which is significantly higher than MUSA's 46.46% return. Over the past 10 years, WSM has underperformed MUSA with an annualized return of 20.31%, while MUSA has yielded a comparatively higher 23.34% annualized return.
WSM
87.46%
38.97%
17.27%
86.14%
41.72%
20.31%
MUSA
46.46%
-0.15%
8.65%
44.27%
34.78%
23.34%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
WSM vs. MUSA - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Williams-Sonoma, Inc. (WSM) and Murphy USA Inc. (MUSA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
WSM vs. MUSA - Dividend Comparison
WSM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.16%, more than MUSA's 0.34% yield.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
WSM Williams-Sonoma, Inc. | 1.16% | 1.72% | 2.65% | 1.43% | 1.93% | 2.55% | 3.33% | 2.98% | 3.02% | 2.36% | 1.72% | 1.97% |
MUSA Murphy USA Inc. | 0.34% | 0.43% | 0.45% | 0.52% | 0.19% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
WSM vs. MUSA - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum WSM drawdown since its inception was -89.01%, which is greater than MUSA's maximum drawdown of -33.72%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WSM and MUSA. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
WSM vs. MUSA - Volatility Comparison
Williams-Sonoma, Inc. (WSM) has a higher volatility of 26.39% compared to Murphy USA Inc. (MUSA) at 6.13%. This indicates that WSM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MUSA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Financials
WSM vs. MUSA - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Williams-Sonoma, Inc. and Murphy USA Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities