WSM vs. MUSA

Last updated Apr 2, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Williams-Sonoma, Inc. (WSM) and Murphy USA Inc. (MUSA).

Performance

WSM vs. MUSA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Williams-Sonoma, Inc. (WSM) and Murphy USA Inc. (MUSA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

WSM vs. MUSA - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
WSM Williams-Sonoma, Inc.	1.32%	-2.09%	86.56%	80.24%	-30.49%	68.60%	42.38%	50.07%	0.61%	10.20%
MUSA Murphy USA Inc.	22.82%	-19.15%	41.27%	28.20%	41.02%	53.33%	12.06%	52.66%	-4.63%	30.73%

Fundamentals

Market Cap WSM : $21.82B MUSA : $9.32B
EPS WSM : $8.84 MUSA : $24.32
PE Ratio WSM : 20.41 MUSA : 20.35
PEG Ratio WSM : 4.13 MUSA : 1.10
PS Ratio WSM : 2.85 MUSA : 0.49
PB Ratio WSM : 10.48 MUSA : 14.95
Total Revenue (TTM) WSM : $7.81B MUSA : $19.38B
Gross Profit (TTM) WSM : $3.60B MUSA : $1.09B
EBITDA (TTM) WSM : $1.55B MUSA : $940.50M

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, WSM achieves a 1.32% return, which is significantly lower than MUSA's 22.82% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with WSM having a 23.64% annualized return and MUSA not far behind at 23.45%.

WSM

• 1D: -1.07%
• 1M: -10.42%
• YTD: 1.32%
• 6M: -7.03%
• 1Y: 15.29%
• 3Y*: 46.29%
• 5Y*: 16.84%
• 10Y*: 23.64%

MUSA

• 1D: 0.17%
• 1M: 22.76%
• YTD: 22.82%
• 6M: 25.82%
• 1Y: 4.74%
• 3Y*: 24.84%
• 5Y*: 28.42%
• 10Y*: 23.45%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

WSM vs. MUSA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

WSM

WSM Risk / Return Rank: 54
WSM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 54
WSM Sortino Ratio Rank: 50
WSM Omega Ratio Rank: 49
WSM Calmar Ratio Rank: 58
WSM Martin Ratio Rank: 58

MUSA

MUSA Risk / Return Rank: 42
MUSA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 45
MUSA Sortino Ratio Rank: 38
MUSA Omega Ratio Rank: 39
MUSA Calmar Ratio Rank: 46
MUSA Martin Ratio Rank: 44

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

WSM vs. MUSA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Williams-Sonoma, Inc. (WSM) and Murphy USA Inc. (MUSA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	WSM	MUSA	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	0.38	0.13	+0.25
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	0.82	0.40	+0.41
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.10	1.06	+0.05
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.77	0.19	+0.58
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	1.73	0.28	+1.45
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

WSM vs. MUSA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current WSM Sharpe Ratio is 0.38, which is higher than the MUSA Sharpe Ratio of 0.13. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of WSM and MUSA, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	WSM	MUSA	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.38	0.13	+0.25
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.38	0.98	-0.60
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.54	0.76	-0.22
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.33	0.76	-0.43

Correlation

The correlation between WSM and MUSA is 0.27, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Dividends

WSM vs. MUSA - Dividend Comparison

WSM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.46%, more than MUSA's 0.46% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
WSM Williams-Sonoma, Inc.	1.46%	1.43%	1.16%	1.72%	2.65%	1.43%	1.93%	2.55%	3.33%	2.98%	3.02%	2.36%
MUSA Murphy USA Inc.	0.46%	0.53%	0.36%	0.43%	0.45%	0.52%	0.19%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Drawdowns

WSM vs. MUSA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum WSM drawdown since its inception was -89.01%, which is greater than MUSA's maximum drawdown of -35.54%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WSM and MUSA.

Drawdown Indicators

	WSM	MUSA	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-89.01%	-35.54%	-53.47%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-20.56%	-31.25%	+10.69%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-51.92%	-35.54%	-16.38%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-59.71%	-35.54%	-24.17%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-18.26%	-10.30%	-7.96%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-25.10%	-10.02%	-15.08%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	9.15%	21.30%	-12.15%

Volatility

WSM vs. MUSA - Volatility Comparison

Williams-Sonoma, Inc. (WSM) and Murphy USA Inc. (MUSA) have volatilities of 8.55% and 8.94%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	WSM	MUSA	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	8.55%	8.94%	-0.39%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	23.85%	25.71%	-1.86%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	40.82%	36.58%	+4.24%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	44.73%	29.10%	+15.63%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	44.19%	30.89%	+13.30%

Financials

WSM vs. MUSA - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Williams-Sonoma, Inc. and Murphy USA Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

WSM - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Williams-Sonoma, Inc. reported a gross profit of 1.10B and revenue of 2.36B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 46.9%.

MUSA - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Murphy USA Inc. reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 4.74B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.

WSM - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Williams-Sonoma, Inc. reported an operating income of 477.81M and revenue of 2.36B, resulting in an operating margin of 20.3%.

MUSA - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Murphy USA Inc. reported an operating income of 209.50M and revenue of 4.74B, resulting in an operating margin of 4.4%.

WSM - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Williams-Sonoma, Inc. reported a net income of 368.02M and revenue of 2.36B, resulting in a net margin of 15.6%.

MUSA - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Murphy USA Inc. reported a net income of 141.90M and revenue of 4.74B, resulting in a net margin of 3.0%.