EQT vs. PUMP
EQT (EQT Corporation) and PUMP (ProPetro Holding Corp.) are both stocks. Both are in the Energy sector — EQT in Oil & Gas E&P, PUMP in Oil & Gas Equipment & Services. Over the past 5 years, EQT returned 23.13%/yr vs 7.46%/yr for PUMP. At a 0.36 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
EQT vs. PUMP - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EQT achieves a -4.07% return, which is significantly lower than PUMP's 56.26% return.
EQT
- 1D
- -0.47%
- 1M
- -11.00%
- YTD
- -4.07%
- 6M
- -5.41%
- 1Y
- -12.13%
- 3Y*
- 10.41%
- 5Y*
- 23.13%
- 10Y*
- 2.91%
PUMP
- 1D
- 0.07%
- 1M
- -17.58%
- YTD
- 56.26%
- 6M
- 64.38%
- 1Y
- 121.13%
- 3Y*
- 23.60%
- 5Y*
- 7.46%
- 10Y*
- —
EQT vs. PUMP - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EQT EQT Corporation | -4.07% | 17.64% | 21.41% | 16.20% | 57.64% | 71.60% | 17.27% | -41.82% | -38.82% | -0.95% |
PUMP ProPetro Holding Corp. | 56.26% | 1.93% | 11.34% | -19.19% | 28.02% | 9.61% | -34.31% | -8.69% | -38.89% | 34.40% |
Correlation
The correlation between EQT and PUMP is 0.17, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.17 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.30 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.40 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 17, 2017 | 0.36 |
The correlation between EQT and PUMP shifts across timeframes, from 0.17 (1 year) to 0.40 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
EQT:
$31.96B
PUMP:
$1.74B
EQT:
$5.40
PUMP:
-$0.22
EQT:
3.16
PUMP:
1.76
EQT:
1.27
PUMP:
1.76
EQT:
$10.03B
PUMP:
$909.74M
EQT:
$6.43B
PUMP:
$79.21M
EQT:
$7.48B
PUMP:
$158.47M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
EQT vs. PUMP — Risk / Return Rank
EQT
PUMP
EQT vs. PUMP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for EQT Corporation (EQT) and ProPetro Holding Corp. (PUMP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| EQT | PUMP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.92 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -3.08 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.96 | 1.33 | -0.37 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.49 | 3.80 | -4.29 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.03 | 8.40 | -9.43 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
EQT vs. PUMP - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EQT drawdown since its inception was -91.51%, roughly equal to the maximum PUMP drawdown of -93.88%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EQT and PUMP.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| EQT | PUMP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -91.51% | -93.88% | +2.37% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -25.08% | -32.03% | +6.95% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -31.62% | -59.13% | +27.51% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -42.56% | -72.15% | +29.59% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -88.28% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -24.52% | -39.74% | +15.22% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -23.34% | -52.13% | +28.79% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 11.78% | 14.85% | -3.07% |
Volatility
EQT vs. PUMP - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for EQT Corporation (EQT) is 8.16%, while ProPetro Holding Corp. (PUMP) has a volatility of 17.63%. This indicates that EQT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PUMP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| EQT | PUMP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.16% | 17.63% | -9.47% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 21.13% | 39.69% | -18.56% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 32.36% | 79.15% | -46.79% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 42.74% | 62.17% | -19.43% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 48.91% | 70.94% | -22.03% |
Dividends
EQT vs. PUMP - Dividend Comparison
EQT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.28%, while PUMP has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EQT EQT Corporation | 1.28% | 1.19% | 1.37% | 1.57% | 1.63% | 0.00% | 0.24% | 1.10% | 0.42% | 0.21% | 0.18% | 0.23% |
PUMP ProPetro Holding Corp. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Financials
EQT vs. PUMP - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between EQT Corporation and ProPetro Holding Corp.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
Frequently Asked Questions
EQT and PUMP have a correlation of 0.17, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
PUMP has higher volatility (17.63%) compared to EQT (8.16%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EQT dropped -91.51% vs PUMP's -93.88%.
PUMP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.54 vs -0.38), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for EQT and PUMP
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer