EMKT vs. ATMP

Last updated Jul 15, 2026

EMKT (Lazard Emerging Markets Opportunities ETF) and ATMP (Barclays ETN+ Select MLP ETN) are both exchange-traded funds - EMKT is a Emerging Markets Diversified fund actively managed by Lazard, while ATMP is a MLPs fund tracking the CIBC Atlas Select MLP VWAP. EMKT is actively managed, while ATMP is passively managed. At a correlation of -0.21, they often move in opposite directions. EMKT charges 0.74%/yr vs 0.95%/yr for ATMP.

Performance

EMKT vs. ATMP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Lazard Emerging Markets Opportunities ETF (EMKT) and Barclays ETN+ Select MLP ETN (ATMP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EMKT achieves a 23.70% return, which is significantly lower than ATMP's 24.97% return.

EMKT

• 1D: 1.37%
• 1M: -2.53%
• 6M: 19.09%
• YTD: 23.70%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

ATMP

• 1D: 0.53%
• 1M: 3.63%
• 6M: 22.02%
• YTD: 24.97%
• 1Y: 23.33%
• 3Y*: 21.20%
• 5Y*: 18.13%
• 10Y*: 4.68%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EMKT vs. ATMP - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
EMKT Lazard Emerging Markets Opportunities ETF	23.70%	-1.26%
ATMP Barclays ETN+ Select MLP ETN	24.97%	3.75%

Correlation

The correlation between EMKT and ATMP is -0.21, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 27, 2025	-0.21

Return for Risk

EMKT vs. ATMP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EMKT

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

ATMP

ATMP Risk / Return Rank: 60
ATMP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 61
ATMP Sortino Ratio Rank: 61
ATMP Omega Ratio Rank: 55
ATMP Calmar Ratio Rank: 71
ATMP Martin Ratio Rank: 50

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EMKT vs. ATMP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lazard Emerging Markets Opportunities ETF (EMKT) and Barclays ETN+ Select MLP ETN (ATMP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	EMKT	ATMP	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	—	1.61	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	—	2.30	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	—	1.28	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	—	2.84	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	—	6.66	—

Drawdowns

EMKT vs. ATMP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EMKT drawdown since its inception was -14.21%, smaller than the maximum ATMP drawdown of -80.86%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EMKT and ATMP.

Drawdown Indicators

	EMKT	ATMP	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-14.21%	-80.86%	+66.65%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-8.30%	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-16.48%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-22.98%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-75.66%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-6.90%	-2.19%	-4.71%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.28%	-30.93%	+27.65%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	3.52%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	EMKT	ATMP	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	5.19%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	11.47%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	25.42%	14.60%	+10.82%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	25.42%	22.10%	+3.32%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	25.42%	27.63%	-2.21%

EMKT vs. ATMP - Expense Ratio Comparison

EMKT has a 0.74% expense ratio, which is lower than ATMP's 0.95% expense ratio.

Dividends

EMKT vs. ATMP - Dividend Comparison

EMKT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.45%, while ATMP has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM
ATMP Barclays ETN+ Select MLP ETN	0.00%
EMKT Lazard Emerging Markets Opportunities ETF	0.45%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both EMKT and ATMP in my portfolio?

EMKT and ATMP have a correlation of -0.21, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, EMKT or ATMP?

On fees, EMKT is cheaper at 0.74% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, EMKT or ATMP?

EMKT is cheaper with a 0.74% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for ATMP.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, EMKT or ATMP?

EMKT has the higher dividend yield at 0.45%, compared with 0.00% for ATMP.

What is the main difference between EMKT and ATMP?

EMKT is categorized as Emerging Markets Diversified, while ATMP is MLPs. They also come from different issuers: Lazard and Barclays Capital. Their fees differ too: 0.74% for EMKT and 0.95% for ATMP.