PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EMKT vs. IDEQ
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

EMKT vs. IDEQ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Lazard Emerging Markets Opportunities ETF (EMKT) and Lazard International Dynamic Equity ETF (IDEQ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EMKT achieves a 32.87% return, which is significantly higher than IDEQ's 19.27% return.


EMKT

1D
0.39%
1M
9.53%
YTD
32.87%
6M
34.09%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

IDEQ

1D
0.28%
1M
4.53%
YTD
19.27%
6M
20.22%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EMKT vs. IDEQ - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between EMKT and IDEQ is 0.85, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 27, 2025

0.85

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

EMKT vs. IDEQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lazard Emerging Markets Opportunities ETF (EMKT) and Lazard International Dynamic Equity ETF (IDEQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

EMKT vs. IDEQ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

EMKT vs. IDEQ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EMKT drawdown since its inception was -14.21%, which is greater than IDEQ's maximum drawdown of -12.95%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EMKT and IDEQ.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


EMKTIDEQDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-14.21%

-12.95%

-1.26%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.08%

-2.07%

-1.01%

Volatility

EMKT vs. IDEQ - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


EMKTIDEQDifference

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

23.71%

19.19%

+4.52%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

23.71%

19.19%

+4.52%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

23.71%

19.19%

+4.52%

EMKT vs. IDEQ - Expense Ratio Comparison

EMKT has a 0.74% expense ratio, which is higher than IDEQ's 0.40% expense ratio.


Dividends

EMKT vs. IDEQ - Dividend Comparison

EMKT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.42%, less than IDEQ's 1.30% yield.


Frequently Asked Questions


EMKT and IDEQ have a correlation of 0.85, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, IDEQ is cheaper at 0.40% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

IDEQ is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 0.74% for EMKT.

IDEQ has the higher dividend yield at 1.30%, compared with 0.42% for EMKT.

EMKT is categorized as Emerging Markets Diversified, while IDEQ is Foreign Large Cap Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.74% for EMKT and 0.40% for IDEQ.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EMKT and IDEQ

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer