EMKT vs. EEMS

Last updated Apr 2, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Lazard Emerging Markets Opportunities ETF (EMKT) and iShares MSCI Emerging Markets Small-Cap ETF (EEMS).

EMKT and EEMS are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. EMKT is an actively managed fund by Lazard. It was launched on Oct 27, 2025. EEMS is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the MSCI Emerging Markets Small Cap Index. It was launched on Aug 16, 2011.

Performance

EMKT vs. EEMS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Lazard Emerging Markets Opportunities ETF (EMKT) and iShares MSCI Emerging Markets Small-Cap ETF (EEMS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

EMKT vs. EEMS - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
EMKT Lazard Emerging Markets Opportunities ETF	4.36%	-1.29%
EEMS iShares MSCI Emerging Markets Small-Cap ETF	3.38%	0.05%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EMKT achieves a 4.36% return, which is significantly higher than EEMS's 3.38% return.

EMKT

• 1D: 1.42%
• 1M: -7.18%
• YTD: 4.36%
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

EEMS

• 1D: 0.84%
• 1M: -5.33%
• YTD: 3.38%
• 6M: 4.76%
• 1Y: 27.44%
• 3Y*: 14.64%
• 5Y*: 6.60%
• 10Y*: 8.19%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EMKT vs. EEMS - Expense Ratio Comparison

EMKT has a 0.74% expense ratio, which is higher than EEMS's 0.73% expense ratio.

EMKT

Lazard Emerging Markets Opportunities ETF

EEMS

iShares MSCI Emerging Markets Small-Cap ETF

Return for Risk

EMKT vs. EEMS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EEMS

EEMS Risk / Return Rank: 80
EEMS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 80
EEMS Sortino Ratio Rank: 79
EEMS Omega Ratio Rank: 76
EEMS Calmar Ratio Rank: 85
EEMS Martin Ratio Rank: 82

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EMKT vs. EEMS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lazard Emerging Markets Opportunities ETF (EMKT) and iShares MSCI Emerging Markets Small-Cap ETF (EEMS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	EMKT	EEMS	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	1.56	—
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.42	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.46	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.36	0.28	+0.07

Correlation

The correlation between EMKT and EEMS is 0.82, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.

Dividends

EMKT vs. EEMS - Dividend Comparison

EMKT has not paid dividends to shareholders, while EEMS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.99%.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
EMKT Lazard Emerging Markets Opportunities ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
EEMS iShares MSCI Emerging Markets Small-Cap ETF	2.99%	3.09%	2.60%	2.69%	0.89%	3.56%	2.14%	2.64%	3.06%	2.47%	2.51%	2.33%

Drawdowns

EMKT vs. EEMS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EMKT drawdown since its inception was -14.21%, smaller than the maximum EEMS drawdown of -48.89%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EMKT and EEMS.

Drawdown Indicators

	EMKT	EEMS	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-14.21%	-48.89%	+34.68%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-10.99%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-27.07%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-48.89%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-9.71%	-7.86%	-1.85%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.41%	-10.60%	+7.19%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	3.06%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	EMKT	EEMS	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	8.24%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	12.39%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	20.38%	17.74%	+2.64%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	20.38%	15.69%	+4.69%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	20.38%	17.79%	+2.59%