EFAV vs. VOO

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

EFAV (iShares Edge MSCI Min Vol EAFE ETF) and VOO (Vanguard S&P 500 ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - EFAV is a Foreign Large Cap Equities fund tracking the MSCI EAFE Minimum Volatility Index, while VOO is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, EFAV returned 5.92%/yr vs 15.55%/yr for VOO. A 0.69 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. EFAV charges 0.20%/yr vs 0.03%/yr for VOO.

Performance

EFAV vs. VOO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Edge MSCI Min Vol EAFE ETF (EFAV) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EFAV achieves a 4.42% return, which is significantly lower than VOO's 11.34% return. Over the past 10 years, EFAV has underperformed VOO with an annualized return of 5.92%, while VOO has yielded a comparatively higher 15.55% annualized return.

EFAV

• 1D: 0.57%
• 1M: -1.23%
• YTD: 4.42%
• 6M: 5.83%
• 1Y: 9.78%
• 3Y*: 13.24%
• 5Y*: 6.29%
• 10Y*: 5.92%

VOO

• 1D: 0.39%
• 1M: 4.62%
• YTD: 11.34%
• 6M: 11.27%
• 1Y: 28.62%
• 3Y*: 22.68%
• 5Y*: 13.98%
• 10Y*: 15.55%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EFAV vs. VOO - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
EFAV iShares Edge MSCI Min Vol EAFE ETF	4.42%	26.00%	5.30%	12.52%	-15.11%	7.20%	-0.06%	16.67%	-5.74%	22.24%
VOO Vanguard S&P 500 ETF	11.34%	17.82%	24.98%	26.32%	-18.17%	28.79%	18.32%	31.37%	-4.50%	21.77%

Correlation

The correlation between EFAV and VOO is 0.46, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.46
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.49
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.60
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.65
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 21, 2011	0.69

Over the past year, the correlation between EFAV and VOO has dropped to 0.46 - well below their long-term average of 0.69, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

EFAV vs. VOO - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	EFAV	VOO
Financial Services	19.9%	11.6%
Industrials	15.1%	8.3%
Healthcare	12.4%	8.5%
Consumer Defensive	11.5%	4.9%
Communication Services	9.7%	11.3%
Utilities	9.1%	2.4%
Energy	8.2%	3.5%
Consumer Cyclical	5.2%	10.2%
Technology	4.5%	35.7%
Real Estate	2.9%	1.9%
Basic Materials	1.6%	1.8%

Return for Risk

EFAV vs. VOO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EFAV

EFAV Risk / Return Rank: 28
EFAV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 28
EFAV Sortino Ratio Rank: 26
EFAV Omega Ratio Rank: 26
EFAV Calmar Ratio Rank: 32
EFAV Martin Ratio Rank: 30

VOO

VOO Risk / Return Rank: 74
VOO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 76
VOO Sortino Ratio Rank: 75
VOO Omega Ratio Rank: 75
VOO Calmar Ratio Rank: 66
VOO Martin Ratio Rank: 78

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EFAV vs. VOO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Edge MSCI Min Vol EAFE ETF (EFAV) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	EFAV	VOO	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.95	2.44	-1.49
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.38	3.31	-1.93
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.17	1.44	-0.27
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.52	3.23	-1.71
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	4.22	15.03	-10.81
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

EFAV vs. VOO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EFAV Sharpe Ratio is 0.95, which is lower than the VOO Sharpe Ratio of 2.44. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EFAV and VOO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	EFAV	VOO	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.95	2.44	-1.49
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.54	0.84	-0.30
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.45	0.87	-0.42
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.54	0.89	-0.35

Drawdowns

EFAV vs. VOO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EFAV drawdown since its inception was -27.56%, smaller than the maximum VOO drawdown of -33.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EFAV and VOO.

Drawdown Indicators

	EFAV	VOO	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-27.56%	-33.99%	+6.43%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-6.46%	-8.90%	+2.44%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-8.75%	-18.69%	+9.94%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-27.46%	-24.52%	-2.94%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-27.56%	-33.99%	+6.43%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-5.07%	-0.32%	-4.75%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.77%	-3.69%	-1.08%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.32%	1.91%	+0.41%

Volatility

EFAV vs. VOO - Volatility Comparison

iShares Edge MSCI Min Vol EAFE ETF (EFAV) has a higher volatility of 3.14% compared to Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) at 2.78%. This indicates that EFAV's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VOO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	EFAV	VOO	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.14%	2.78%	+0.36%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	8.19%	8.90%	-0.71%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	10.32%	11.80%	-1.48%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	11.79%	16.81%	-5.02%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	13.21%	18.00%	-4.79%

EFAV vs. VOO - Expense Ratio Comparison

EFAV has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is higher than VOO's 0.03% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

EFAV vs. VOO - Dividend Comparison

EFAV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.06%, more than VOO's 1.02% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
EFAV iShares Edge MSCI Min Vol EAFE ETF	3.06%	3.20%	3.24%	3.08%	2.53%	2.47%	1.33%	4.19%	3.34%	2.45%	3.94%	2.49%
VOO Vanguard S&P 500 ETF	1.02%	1.13%	1.24%	1.46%	1.69%	1.25%	1.54%	1.88%	2.06%	1.78%	2.02%	2.10%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both EFAV and VOO in my portfolio?

EFAV and VOO have a correlation of 0.46, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, EFAV or VOO?

EFAV has higher volatility (3.14%) compared to VOO (2.78%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EFAV dropped -27.56% vs VOO's -33.99%.

Which ETF is better, EFAV or VOO?

On 10-year performance, VOO leads with 15.55% vs 5.92% for EFAV. On fees, VOO is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, VOO has been the lower-risk option at 2.78%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, EFAV or VOO?

Over the 10-year period, VOO has performed better with a 15.55% return vs 5.92%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, EFAV or VOO?

VOO is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for EFAV.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, EFAV or VOO?

EFAV has the higher dividend yield at 3.06%, compared with 1.02% for VOO.

What is the main difference between EFAV and VOO?

EFAV is categorized as Foreign Large Cap Equities, while VOO is S&P 500. EFAV tracks MSCI EAFE Minimum Volatility Index, while VOO tracks S&P 500 Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for EFAV and 0.03% for VOO.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

VOO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.44 vs 0.95), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.