EFAV vs. ACWV
Compare and contrast key facts about iShares Edge MSCI Min Vol EAFE ETF (EFAV) and iShares MSCI Global Min Vol Factor ETF (ACWV).
EFAV and ACWV are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. EFAV is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the MSCI EAFE Minimum Volatility Index. It was launched on Oct 18, 2011. ACWV is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the MSCI AC World Minimum Volatility (USD). It was launched on Oct 18, 2011. Both EFAV and ACWV are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: EFAV or ACWV.
Key characteristics
| EFAV | ACWV | |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Return | 8.87% | 15.30% |
| 1Y Return | 17.85% | 22.82% |
| 3Y Return (Ann) | 1.19% | 4.72% |
| 5Y Return (Ann) | 2.53% | 6.14% |
| 10Y Return (Ann) | 4.50% | 7.53% |
| Sharpe Ratio | 1.84 | 3.00 |
| Sortino Ratio | 2.61 | 4.16 |
| Omega Ratio | 1.32 | 1.55 |
| Calmar Ratio | 1.27 | 2.50 |
| Martin Ratio | 10.16 | 19.30 |
| Ulcer Index | 1.77% | 1.15% |
| Daily Std Dev | 9.75% | 7.43% |
| Max Drawdown | -27.56% | -28.82% |
| Current Drawdown | -4.33% | -0.54% |
Correlation
The correlation between EFAV and ACWV is 0.84, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Performance
EFAV vs. ACWV - Performance Comparison
In the year-to-date period, EFAV achieves a 8.87% return, which is significantly lower than ACWV's 15.30% return. Over the past 10 years, EFAV has underperformed ACWV with an annualized return of 4.50%, while ACWV has yielded a comparatively higher 7.53% annualized return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
EFAV vs. ACWV - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both EFAV and ACWV have an expense ratio of 0.20%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
EFAV vs. ACWV - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Edge MSCI Min Vol EAFE ETF (EFAV) and iShares MSCI Global Min Vol Factor ETF (ACWV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
EFAV vs. ACWV - Dividend Comparison
EFAV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.04%, more than ACWV's 2.15% yield.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EFAV iShares Edge MSCI Min Vol EAFE ETF | 3.04% | 3.07% | 2.53% | 2.47% | 1.33% | 4.19% | 3.34% | 2.45% | 3.94% | 2.49% | 3.57% | 2.53% |
ACWV iShares MSCI Global Min Vol Factor ETF | 2.15% | 2.41% | 2.18% | 1.92% | 1.77% | 2.54% | 2.32% | 2.04% | 2.56% | 2.28% | 2.23% | 2.47% |
Drawdowns
EFAV vs. ACWV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EFAV drawdown since its inception was -27.56%, roughly equal to the maximum ACWV drawdown of -28.82%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EFAV and ACWV. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
EFAV vs. ACWV - Volatility Comparison
iShares Edge MSCI Min Vol EAFE ETF (EFAV) has a higher volatility of 3.05% compared to iShares MSCI Global Min Vol Factor ETF (ACWV) at 2.21%. This indicates that EFAV's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ACWV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.