EFAV vs. SPLV
Compare and contrast key facts about iShares Edge MSCI Min Vol EAFE ETF (EFAV) and Invesco S&P 500® Low Volatility ETF (SPLV).
EFAV and SPLV are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. EFAV is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the MSCI EAFE Minimum Volatility Index. It was launched on Oct 18, 2011. SPLV is a passively managed fund by Invesco that tracks the performance of the S&P 500 Low Volatility Index. It was launched on May 5, 2011. Both EFAV and SPLV are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: EFAV or SPLV.
Key characteristics
| EFAV | SPLV | |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Return | 6.49% | 19.07% |
| 1Y Return | 12.29% | 23.85% |
| 3Y Return (Ann) | 0.47% | 6.78% |
| 5Y Return (Ann) | 2.10% | 7.31% |
| 10Y Return (Ann) | 4.27% | 9.48% |
| Sharpe Ratio | 1.45 | 2.75 |
| Sortino Ratio | 2.07 | 3.84 |
| Omega Ratio | 1.25 | 1.50 |
| Calmar Ratio | 1.14 | 2.61 |
| Martin Ratio | 7.63 | 18.38 |
| Ulcer Index | 1.87% | 1.38% |
| Daily Std Dev | 9.87% | 9.23% |
| Max Drawdown | -27.56% | -36.26% |
| Current Drawdown | -6.43% | -0.14% |
Correlation
The correlation between EFAV and SPLV is 0.65, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Performance
EFAV vs. SPLV - Performance Comparison
In the year-to-date period, EFAV achieves a 6.49% return, which is significantly lower than SPLV's 19.07% return. Over the past 10 years, EFAV has underperformed SPLV with an annualized return of 4.27%, while SPLV has yielded a comparatively higher 9.48% annualized return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
EFAV vs. SPLV - Expense Ratio Comparison
EFAV has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than SPLV's 0.25% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
EFAV vs. SPLV - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Edge MSCI Min Vol EAFE ETF (EFAV) and Invesco S&P 500® Low Volatility ETF (SPLV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
EFAV vs. SPLV - Dividend Comparison
EFAV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.10%, more than SPLV's 1.88% yield.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EFAV iShares Edge MSCI Min Vol EAFE ETF | 3.10% | 3.07% | 2.53% | 2.47% | 1.33% | 4.19% | 3.34% | 2.45% | 3.94% | 2.49% | 3.57% | 2.53% |
SPLV Invesco S&P 500® Low Volatility ETF | 1.88% | 2.45% | 2.11% | 1.50% | 2.13% | 2.08% | 2.17% | 2.03% | 2.03% | 2.28% | 2.20% | 2.60% |
Drawdowns
EFAV vs. SPLV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EFAV drawdown since its inception was -27.56%, smaller than the maximum SPLV drawdown of -36.26%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EFAV and SPLV. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
EFAV vs. SPLV - Volatility Comparison
iShares Edge MSCI Min Vol EAFE ETF (EFAV) has a higher volatility of 3.26% compared to Invesco S&P 500® Low Volatility ETF (SPLV) at 2.83%. This indicates that EFAV's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SPLV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.